Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

RNA Isolation Methods - Diverse Biofluids

ABSTRACT: RNA Isolation Methods - Diverse Biofluids

PROVIDER: PRJNA1013972 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR25943100.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR25943101.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR25943102.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR25943103.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR25943104.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 60

Similar Datasets

RNA Isolation Methods - Diverse Biofluids

Project description:To evaluate performance of different extra cellular RNA isolation methods in biofluids

2023-09-30 | GSE242613 | GEO

Small RNA sequencing across diverse biofluids identifies optimal methods for exRNA isolation

Project description:Small RNA sequencing across diverse biofluids identifies optimal methods for exRNA isolation

| PRJNA671225 | ENA

Small RNA sequencing across diverse biofluids identifies optimal methods for exRNA isolation

Project description:Small RNA sequencing across diverse biofluids identifies optimal methods for exRNA isolation

| PRJNA671227 | ENA

Large differences in small RNA composition between human biofluids - 10 biofluids

Project description:One goal of Phase 1 of our project is to produce reference profiles of miRNAs and other small RNAs in a large and diverse set of biofluids using a systemic approach. This study contains samples associated with 10 different biofluids, and all data (sequencing data, full alignments, etc.) is openly available.

2018-03-27 | GSE112343 | GEO

Small RNA Sequencing across Diverse Biofluids Identifies Optimal Methods for exRNA Isolation.

Project description:Poor reproducibility within and across studies arising from lack of knowledge regarding the performance of extracellular RNA (exRNA) isolation methods has hindered progress in the exRNA field. A systematic comparison of 10 exRNA isolation methods across 5 biofluids revealed marked differences in the complexity and reproducibility of the resulting small RNA-seq profiles. The relative efficiency with which each method accessed different exRNA carrier subclasses was determined by estimating the proportions of extracellular vesicle (EV)-, ribonucleoprotein (RNP)-, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-specific miRNA signatures in each profile. An interactive web-based application (miRDaR) was developed to help investigators select the optimal exRNA isolation method for their studies. miRDar provides comparative statistics for all expressed miRNAs or a selected subset of miRNAs in the desired biofluid for each exRNA isolation method and returns a ranked list of exRNA isolation methods prioritized by complexity, expression level, and reproducibility. These results will improve reproducibility and stimulate further progress in exRNA biomarker development.

| S-EPMC6557167 | biostudies-literature

Colorectal cancer cell supermeres isolation methods

Project description:Colorectal cancer cell supermeres isolation methods

| PRJNA1136963 | ENA

Total RNA sequencing in human biofluids and extracellular vesicles using SMARTer technology

Project description:Transcriptome profiling has emerged as a powerful tool to investigate the biomarker potential of human biofluids. However, despite an enormous interest in extracellular nucleic acids, total RNA sequencing methods to quantify RNA content outside cells are rare. Here, we evaluate the performance of the SMARTer Stranded Total RNA-Seq method in human platelet-rich plasma, platelet-poor plasma, urine, conditioned medium, and extracellular vesicles from these biofluids.

2019-09-01 | GSE131689 | GEO

microRNA expression in human traumatic brain injury biofluids

Project description:Purpose: The goal of this study is to investigate the expression of microRNAs in TBI biofluids compared to uninjured controls Methods: miRNA-Seq analysis of microRNA expression TBI and uninjured control biofluids

2020-03-09 | GSE131695 | GEO

Large differences in small RNA composition between human biofluids - 10 biofluids

Project description:Large differences in small RNA composition between human biofluids - 10 biofluids

| PRJNA445720 | ENA

Comparison of EVs isolation methods for miRNAs sequencing

Project description:Background & aims: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) encapsulated in EVs are potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. However, discrepancies on miRNA patterns and their validation are still frequent due to differences in sample origin, EVs isolation, miRNA extraction and sequencing methods. Selecting appropriate EVs isolation methods is therefore a critical step for miRNA-based biomarker discovery. The aim of the present study is to find the most suitable EVs isolation method for miRNAs sequencing adequate for clinical application. Material & Methods EVs were isolated by Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC), iodixanol gradients (GRAD) and the combination of both (SEC+GRAD), using the same plasma sample, in triplicate isolation assays. Isolated EVs were characterized and RNA was extracted. Three different protocols for miRNA library preparation were compared (NEBNext, NEXTFlex and SMARTer smRNA-seq) and miRNAs encapsulated on EVs were sequenced using NextSeq 500 system (Illumina). Finally, the yield, abundance and diversity of miRNAs using the three different EVs isolation protocols were analyzed and compared between them. Results The majority of lipoproteins, total cholesterol and plasma proteins were removed from the EVs-containing fractions by using SEC, GRAD, and SEC+GRAD. SEC method recovered a larger amount of EVs followed by GRAD and SEC+GRAD, while GRAD and SEC+GRAD yielded the purest vesicles. NEBNext was the library preparation kit that showed the highest reproducibility among replicas, higher number of reads corresponding to miRNAs and more different miRNAs, followed by NEXTFlex and SMARTer smRNA-seq. GRAD method showed the highest reproducibility among replicas, a higher number of reads corresponding to miRNAs and more different miRNAs, followed by SEC and SEC+GRAD methods. Conclusions These results render the GRAD method to isolate EVs as one of the most appropriate to detect miRNAs from Evs.

2023-04-26 | GSE223838 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data