Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA1031366 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR26494641_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR26494641_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR26494642_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR26494642_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR26494643_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 12 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Sample groupings for this project are as follows: Cauline leaf vs Cultured Cell : - Cauline leaf, p1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Cauline leaf, p2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Cauline leaf, p3; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Cotyledon light vs Cotyledon dark : - Cotyledon, CP1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Cotyledon, CP2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Cotyledon light vs Cultured cell : - Cotyledon, cn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Cotyledon, cn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Cotyledon dark vs Cultured cell : - Cotyledon dark, n1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Cotyledon dark, n2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Cotyledon dark, n3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Germinating seed vs Cultured cell : - Germinating seed, gn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Germinating seed, gn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Germinating seed, gn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Hypocotyl light vs Hypocotyl dark : - Hypocotyl, hldn1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Hypocotyl, hldn2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Hypocotyl light vs Cultured cell : - Hypocotyl light, hln1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Hypocotyl light, hln2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Petal vs Cultured cell : - Petal, pn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Petal, pn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Petal, pn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) 1DBP vs Cultured cell : - Pistil 1DBP, pin1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DBP, pin2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DBP, pin3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Pistil 1DPP vs Cultured cell : - Pistil 1DPP, psn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DPP, psn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DPP, psn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DPP, psn4; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Root dark vs Cultured cell : - Root dark, rdn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Root dark, rdn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Root light vs Cultured cell : - Root light, rln1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Root light, rlp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Root light vs Root dark : - Root light vs dark, rldp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Root light vs dark, rldp2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Rosette leaf vs Cultured cell : - Rosette leaf, rfp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Rosette leaf, rfp2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Rosette leaf, rfp3; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Sepal vs Cultured cell : - Sepal, sn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Sepal, sn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Silique 3DPP vs Cultured cell : - Silique 3DPP, s3n1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 3DPP, s3n2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 3DPP, s3n3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Silique 8DPP vs Cultured cell : - Silique 8DPP, s8n1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 8DPP, s8n2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 8DPP, s8n3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Stamen vs Cultured cell : - Stamen, smn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Stamen, smn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Stamen, smn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Hypocotyl dark vs Cultured cell : - Hypocotyl dark, hn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Hypocotyl dark, hn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Stem vs Cultured cell : - Stem, stp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Stem, stp2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Stem, stp3; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Keywords: other
2004-10-24 | GSE1599 | GEO
Project description:Monitor changes in the proteome of senescing leaves, using protein MS data obtained from the same leaf groups used for imaging. Arabidopsis thaliana mature leaves were grouped according to their chlorophyll content: Dark Green (DG), Green (G), Light Green (LG) and Yellow (Y), containing 100, 45, 25 and 6.5% chlorophyll relative to DG, respectivelyArabidopsis thaliana mature leaves were grouped according to their chlorophyll content: Dark Green (DG), Green (G), Light Green (LG) and Yellow (Y), containing 100, 45, 25 and 6.5% chlorophyll relative to DG, respectively
2022-03-02 | PXD010465 | Pride
Project description:Sample groupings for this project are as follows: Cauline leaf vs Cultured Cell : - Cauline leaf, p1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Cauline leaf, p2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Cauline leaf, p3; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Cotyledon light vs Cotyledon dark : - Cotyledon, CP1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Cotyledon, CP2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Cotyledon light vs Cultured cell : - Cotyledon, cn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Cotyledon, cn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Cotyledon dark vs Cultured cell : - Cotyledon dark, n1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Cotyledon dark, n2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Cotyledon dark, n3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Germinating seed vs Cultured cell : - Germinating seed, gn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Germinating seed, gn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Germinating seed, gn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Hypocotyl light vs Hypocotyl dark : - Hypocotyl, hldn1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Hypocotyl, hldn2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Hypocotyl light vs Cultured cell : - Hypocotyl light, hln1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Hypocotyl light, hln2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Petal vs Cultured cell : - Petal, pn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Petal, pn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Petal, pn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) 1DBP vs Cultured cell : - Pistil 1DBP, pin1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DBP, pin2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DBP, pin3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Pistil 1DPP vs Cultured cell : - Pistil 1DPP, psn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DPP, psn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DPP, psn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DPP, psn4; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Root dark vs Cultured cell : - Root dark, rdn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Root dark, rdn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Root light vs Cultured cell : - Root light, rln1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Root light, rlp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Root light vs Root dark : - Root light vs dark, rldp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Root light vs dark, rldp2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Rosette leaf vs Cultured cell : - Rosette leaf, rfp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Rosette leaf, rfp2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Rosette leaf, rfp3; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Sepal vs Cultured cell : - Sepal, sn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Sepal, sn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Silique 3DPP vs Cultured cell : - Silique 3DPP, s3n1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 3DPP, s3n2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 3DPP, s3n3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Silique 8DPP vs Cultured cell : - Silique 8DPP, s8n1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 8DPP, s8n2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 8DPP, s8n3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Stamen vs Cultured cell : - Stamen, smn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Stamen, smn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Stamen, smn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Hypocotyl dark vs Cultured cell : - Hypocotyl dark, hn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Hypocotyl dark, hn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Stem vs Cultured cell : - Stem, stp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Stem, stp2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Stem, stp3; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3)
2004-10-24 | E-GEOD-1599 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:fapesp-bra-inra-10-01_bioen_hypocotyl - dark hypocotyls tor rnai - Transcriptional comparison between 2 TOR RNAi mutants versus GUS control. - Sowing after 24h imbibition at 4°C in the dark, on MS1/5, no sucrose, 10 mM ethanol, 8 g/l agar, vertical growth with 3h light, 6 days growth in the dark (20°C), hypocotyls were harvested under green light ; cotyledons and root were removed.
2012-10-10 | GSE41404 | GEO
Project description:Artificial light at night (ALAN) disrupts natural light-dark cycles, posing ecological challenges for wildli in urban areas. Here we investigated the efcts of ALAN on gene expression in the brain, liver, skin, and gonads of green anole lizards (Anolis carolinensis) whose urban populations are increasingly exposed to light pollution. To identify genetic pathways impacted by ALAN exposure we analysed expression of genes associated with circadian and metabolic regulation at midday, midnight and at midnight with artificial light. Difrential expression analysis revealed that clock-related genes (PER1, NR1D1, CRY2) were significantly altered in the brain, liver, and skin following ALAN treatment and genes involved in glucagon regulation (GCG) and lipid metabolism (NOCT) were difrentially expressed in the liver, indicating metabolic disruptions. Skin exhibited unique responses to ALAN suggesting that repair responses may be altered as genes related to cellular processes, such as wound healing, were upregulated under normal light and dark conditions. Our findings also show that ALAN disrupts core circadian genes, impacting physiological processes including hormone regulation, glucose homeostasis, and potentially reproductive cycles. This study provides the first transcriptomic evidence of the efcts of light pollution on green anoles, highlighting the need to preserve natural light cycles in urban habitats. An interactive online database developed for this study allows further exploration of gene expression changes, to promote research on artificial light-polluted environments.
2025-04-03 | GSE291397 | GEO
Project description:The heme branch of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis contributes to the regulation of chlorophyll levels. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the balance between chlorophyll and heme synthesis remains elusive. Here, we identified a dark green leaf mutant dg, which contains high levels of chlorophyll b, from an ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) -induced mutant library of Chinese cabbage. The dg phenotype is attributed to a nonsynonymous homozygous mutation in ferrochelatase 2 (BrFC2), leading to an arginine (R) to lysine (K) amino acid substitution in the conserved chlorophyll a/b-binding motif (CAB) of BrFC2. Overexpression of mutated BrFC2 (dBrFC2) in Chinese cabbage results in a pronounced phenotype associated with the dark green leaves, in contrast to transgenic lines overexpressing wild-type BrFC2 with a low-chlorophyll phenotype. Increased dBrFC2 homodimer formation stimulates heme production in dg compared with wildtype BrFC2. Moreover, we found that dBrFC2 interacts with protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase B1 and B2 (BrPORB1 and BrPORB2) to enhance their binding ability to substrate protochlorophyllide (Pchlide), thereby promoting BrPORBs-catalyzed production of chlorophyllide (Chlide) that can be directly converted into chlorophyll. Our results reveal that dBrFC2 is a strong gain-of-function mutation contributing to balancing heme and chlorophyll synthesis via a novel regulatory mechanism in which dBrFC2 promotes BrPORB enzymatic reaction to enhance chlorophyll synthesis.
| PXD037223 |
Project description:Transcriptional profiling of adult C.elegans exposed to E.coli or to GFP-expressing P. aeruginosa (strain PA14). For P. aeruginosa exposure, worms were separated into 2 groups - fully colonized (green) or non-colonized (dark).
2014-12-04 | GSE63846 | GEO
Project description:Transcriptional profiling of adult C.elegans exposed to E.coli or to GFP-expressing P. aeruginosa (strain PA14). For P. aeruginosa exposure, worms were separated into 2 groups - fully colonized (green) or non-colonized (dark).
2012-07-20 | GSE39536 | GEO
Project description:We investigate the impact of SIRT6-overexpression (SIRT6-OE) in the breast cancer mouse model Delta16HER2. After an initial delay in the tumor onset, starting form 20 weeks of age, SIRT6-OE induces a more aggressive phenotype of Delta16HER2 tumors, promoting the formation of more tumors and metastases with respect to controls. SIRT6 can regulate gene expression and chromatin integrity via deacetylation of H3K9ac. Therefore, to gain mechanistic insights, we performed H3K9ac ChIP-seq and RNA-seq on tumors from Delta16HER2/SIRT6-OE and Delta16HER2 mice, harvested at 20 weeks of age.
2023-12-31 | GSE216183 | GEO