Biopsy analysis of trial S1616: Ipilimumab plus nivolumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with anti-PD-1-refractory melanoma
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA1263048 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Similar Datasets
Project description:Biopsy analysis of trial S1616: Ipilimumab plus nivolumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with anti-PD-1-refractory melanoma
| PRJNA1263050 | ENA
Project description:Renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) is a rare but highly aggressive malignancy that mainly afflicts young individuals of African descent and has few treatment options. Despite the approval of combination immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) for other kidney cancers, its efficacy against RMC remains elusive. We conducted a prospective clinical trial of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with RMC. Enrollment was halted for futility after a prespecified interim analysis revealed that all 10 patients experienced rapid disease progression with 5/10 meeting radiological criteria for hyperprogression. Median progression-free survival was only 1.38 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28, 1.60). To elucidate the underlying mechanisms, we analyzed high-quality single-cell RNA sequencing data from RMC patients before and after nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment. Our analysis suggested that ICT-triggered interferon gamma upregulation induces RMC tumor cells to activate key myeloid regulators such as the CEBPB / p300 complex that promote tumor cell proliferation leading to hyperprogression. Using an immunocompetent somatic mosaic genetically engineered mouse model of RMC, we confirmed that combination ICT induced hyperprogression of primary and metastatic tumors compared with IgG control by hijacking myeloid-affiliated transcriptional circuits. Blocking of this “myeloid mimicry” adaptive mechanism using a selective inhibitor of p300 induced sensitivity to combination ICT in our animal model of RMC. These findings provide novel insights into RMC adaptation to ICT and demonstrate that inhibiting master myeloid regulators can elicit antitumor responses to ICT thus informing the next generation of immunotherapy strategies targeting hyperprogression.
2025-06-30 | GSE256326 | GEO
Project description:Sitravatinib is an immunomodulatory tyrosine kinase inhibitor that can improve responses when combined with immune checkpoint therapy (ICT). We conducted a phase I trial to determine the optimal dose of triplet therapy with sitravatinib plus nivolumab plus ipilimumab in 22 previously untreated patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). The primary endpoint was safety. The addition of even a low sitravatinib dose of 35 mg daily to nivolumab 3 mg/kg and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg resulted in high frequency of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Subsequent dose reduction of ipilimumab to 0.7 mg/kg in combination with nivolumab 3 mg/kg allowed safe escalation of sitravatinib up to 100 mg daily. Key secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Overall, the triplet combination in the dose-finding setting achieved an ORR of 45.5%, DCR of 86.4%, and a median PFS of 14.5 months with 72.7% of patients alive after a median follow-up of 15.7 months. Single-cell RNA-seq performed in longitudinally collected tumor biopsies from 12 patients treated with the triplet therapy identified a tumor cell-specific epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-like program associated with treatment resistance and poor outcomes in patients of this trial and in patients of the TCGA ccRCC cohort. Within the tumor microenvironment (TME), the emergence of treatment resistance was characterized by a transition from cytotoxic to exhausted T cell state and enrichment for M2-like myeloid cells. The observed changes in gene expression dynamics and cellular states in tumor cell and TME may help inform future strategies to optimize ICT efficacy.
2024-11-26 | GSE264586 | GEO
Project description:Metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) remains challenging to treat, with objective response rates to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) much lower than in primary cutaneous melanoma (CM). Besides a lower mutational burden, the overall immune-excluded tumor microenvironment of UM might contribute to the poor response rate. We therefore aimed at targeting deficiency in argininosuccinate synthase 1, which is a key metabolic feature of UM. This study aimed at investigating safety and tolerability of a triple combination consisting of ipilimumab and nivolumab immunotherapy and the metabolic therapy ADI-PEG 20. 9 patients were enrolled in this pilot study. The combination therapy was safe and tolerable with absence of immune related adverse events (irAE) of special interest but with 4 of 9 patients experiencing a CTCAE grade 3 AE. No objective responses were observed. All except one patient developed anti-drug antibodies (ADA) within a month of treatment initiation and therefore did not maintain arginine depletion. Further, an IFNg-dependent inflammatory signature was observed in metastatic lesions in patients pre-treated with ICB compared with patients with no pretreatment. Multiplex immunohistochemistry demonstrated variable presence of tumor infiltrating CD8 lymphocytes and PD-L1 expression at baseline in metastases.
2022-05-13 | GSE202687 | GEO
Project description:Expression profiling of tumor samples obtained during CA209-038 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01621490). The purpose of this study is to evaluate pharmacodynamic changes of nivolumab and nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab treatment on the biomarkers measured in the peripheral blood and tumor tissues of subjects with advanced melanoma (unresectable or advanced). Samples are rumor core needle biopsies obtained at trial enrolment (i.e. Screen) and/or at Cycle 1 Day 29 (i.e.Week 4) from Subjects With Advanced Melanoma (Unresectable or Metastatic) treated with nivolumab (BMS-936558,MDX-1106) 3 mg/kg solution intravenously every 2 weeks on Bristol-Myers Squibb clinical trial protocol CA209-038 Part 1 . Cohort 2 patients have progressed on anti-CTLA4 (ipilimumab) monoclonal antibody therapy. Values are from an interim lock of the trial data in July 2014. Best overall response (BOR) was defined using RECIST 1.1 criteria: tumor assessments between date of first dose and the date of first objectively documented progression, or the date of non-missing subsequent anti-cancer therapy (whichever occurs first) were used to derive BOR. MPCT is Maximum reduction in tumor size (index lesions only) up to first progression, and is the value typically shown on a waterfall plot.
2022-01-01 | E-MTAB-4030 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:PurposeIn the phase III CheckMate 067 trial, durable clinical benefit was demonstrated previously with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab. Here, we report 6.5-year efficacy and safety outcomes.Patients and methodsPatients with previously untreated unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (four doses) followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 314), nivolumab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 316), or ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (four doses; n = 315). Coprimary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab versus ipilimumab. Secondary end points included objective response rate, descriptive efficacy assessments of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone, and safety. Melanoma-specific survival (MSS; descriptive analysis), which excludes deaths unrelated to melanoma, was also evaluated.ResultsMedian OS (minimum follow-up, 6.5 years) was 72.1, 36.9, and 19.9 months in the combination, nivolumab, and ipilimumab groups, respectively. Median MSS was not reached, 58.7, and 21.9 months, respectively; 6.5-year OS rates were 57%, 43%, and 25% in patients with BRAF-mutant tumors and 46%, 42%, and 22% in those with BRAF-wild-type tumors, respectively. In patients who discontinued treatment, the median treatment-free interval was 27.6, 2.3, and 1.9 months, respectively. Since the 5-year analysis, no new safety signals were observed.ConclusionThese 6.5-year CheckMate 067 results, which include the longest median OS in a phase III melanoma trial reported to date and the first report of MSS, showed durable, improved clinical outcomes with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab versus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma and, in descriptive analyses, with the combination over nivolumab monotherapy.
| S-EPMC8718224 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Adjuvant therapy for high-risk resected melanoma with PD-1 blockade results in median relapse-free survival (RFS) of 5 years. The addition of low dose ipilimumab (IPI) to a regimen of nivolumab (NIVO) in Checkmate-915, did not result in increased RFS. A pilot phase II adjuvant study of either standard or low dose IPI with NIVO was conducted at two centers to evaluate RFS with correlative studies. Methods: Patients (pts) with resected stages IIIB/IIIC/IV melanoma received either IPI 3mg/kg and NIVO 1mg/kg (cohort 4) or IPI 1mg/kg and NIVO 3mg/kg (cohorts 5 and 6) induction therapy every three weeks for 12 weeks, followed by maintenance NIVO. Peripheral blood samples at baseline and on-treatment were assessed by flow cytometry for potential biomarkers. Peripheral CD8+ T-cells were assessed by RNA-Seq. Results: High rates of grade 3-4 adverse events precluded completion of induction therapy in 50%, 35% and 7% of patients in cohorts 4, 5 and 6 respectively. At a median of 63.9 months of follow up, 16/56 pts (29%) relapsed. For all patients, at five-years, RFS was 71% (95% CI: 60, 84), and overall survival was 94% (95% CI: 88, 100). Expansion of CD3+CD4+CD38+CD127-GARP- T-cells, an on-treatment increase in CD39 expression in CD8+ T-cells, and T-cell expression of phosphorylated STAT2 and STAT5 were associated with relapse. Conclusions: Adjuvant IPI/NIVO at the induction doses used resulted in excellent relapse-free survival, albeit with a high rate of grade 3-4 adverse events. Biomarker analyses highlight an association of ectoenzyme-expressing T-cells and STAT signaling pathways with relapse.
2022-12-02 | GSE219251 | GEO
Project description:ImportanceAlthough the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab has unquestionable benefit over nivolumab monotherapy in advanced melanoma, currently no summative analyses have compared the combination with nivolumab monotherapy for advanced cancers other than melanoma.ObjectiveTo examine whether the addition of ipilimumab to standard-dose nivolumab safely improves clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancers other than melanoma.Data sourcesElectronic databases (PubMed, EBSCO Information Services, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were systematically searched for studies of standard-dose nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs nivolumab alone in the treatment of advanced cancers other than melanoma published from database inception to October 31, 2022.Study selectionEight studies (total patients, 1727; nivolumab plus ipilimumab group, 854; nivolumab monotherapy group, 873) met the selection criteria. Patients had squamous cell lung cancer, non-small cell lung cancer with programmed death ligand 1 level of 1% or higher, small cell lung cancer, pleural mesothelioma, urothelial carcinoma, esophagogastric carcinoma, sarcoma, or glioblastoma multiforme.Data extraction and synthesisFor comparison of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes, estimation of log(hazard ratios [HRs]) and SEs was initially performed for OS and PFS of each included study based on summary statistics extracted from individual Kaplan-Meier curves. Inverse-variance weighting was then used to compute pooled HRs (95% CIs). For comparison of dichotomous data (treatment-related grade 3 to 4 adverse events and discontinuations), odds ratios (ORs) were used, and the Mantel-Haenszel method was used to estimate pooled ORs (95% CIs).ResultsTreatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was not associated with improvement in OS over treatment with nivolumab alone (pooled HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.85-1.06; P = .36), with 4 of the 8 studies having numerically lower median OS with the combination. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy was associated with marginal, but not clinically meaningful, improvement in PFS over nivolumab alone (pooled HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.98; P = .02). The combination was associated with substantially higher treatment-related grade 3 to 4 adverse events (pooled OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.47-2.31; P < .001) and treatment-related discontinuations (pooled OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.44-2.65; P < .001). This finding was recapitulated in meta-analyses of individual grade 3 to 4 adverse events of hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, pneumonitis, endocrine dysfunction, dermatitis, fatigue.Conclusions and relevanceIn this meta-analysis of 8 advanced cancers other than melanoma, the differences detected in OS and PFS between nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab were not clinically meaningful (even though statistical significance was detected in PFS). Treatment-related higher-grade toxicity and discontinuations were substantially higher with the combination therapy. The data indicate that investigations of anti-programmed death 1 (PD1) plus anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) therapies in any nonmelanoma advanced cancer should be conducted along with anti-PD1 monotherapy to ensure that the net effect of the addition of anti-CTLA-4 to anti-PD1 can be clearly established for that cancer and setting and that unnecessary CTLA-4 inhibition with related toxic effects (both clinical and financial) can be avoided.
| S-EPMC10472261 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Pilot Trial of Arginine Deprivation plus Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Uveal Melanoma
| PRJNA836946 | ENA
Project description:Myeloid mimicry mediates hyperprogression in patients with renal medullary carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab
| PRJNA1079196 | ENA