Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Benchmarking of Computational Demultiplexing Methods for Single-Nucleus RNA Sequencing Data [dataset 2]

ABSTRACT: Benchmarking of Computational Demultiplexing Methods for Single-Nucleus RNA Sequencing Data [dataset 2]

PROVIDER: PRJNA1268588 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Benchmarking of Computational Demultiplexing Methods for Single-Nucleus RNA Sequencing Data [dataset 1]

Project description:Benchmarking of Computational Demultiplexing Methods for Single-Nucleus RNA Sequencing Data [dataset 1]

| PRJNA1268586 | ENA

Benchmarking of Computational Demultiplexing Methods for Single-Nucleus RNA Sequencing Data [dataset 2]

Project description:Single-nucleus RNA sequencing enables high-resolution profiling of complex tissues, but its high cost limits large-scale studies. Sample pooling with genetic demultiplexing is a scalable solution, yet comparative benchmarks are lacking. We benchmarked four widely used tools using variants from SNP arrays or extracted from matched bulk RNA-Seq. Performance, including accuracy, runtime, robustness, and scalability, was evaluated. Real-world application to 10x RNA-Seq from human and multi-species heart tissue demonstrates the tools' utility for demultiplexing and doublet removal.

2025-07-30 | GSE298266 | GEO

Benchmarking of Computational Demultiplexing Methods for Single-Nucleus RNA Sequencing Data [dataset 1]

2025-07-30 | GSE298265 | GEO

Benchmarking Peak Calling Methods for CUT&RUN

Project description:Benchmarking Peak Calling Methods for CUT&RUN

| PRJNA1190453 | ENA

Computational Methods for Next-Generation Comparative Genomics

Project description:Computational Methods for Next-Generation Comparative Genomics

| PRJNA671228 | ENA

Designing a single cell RNA sequencing benchmark dataset to compare protocols and analysis methods (9 cell mixture dataset).

Project description:Single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology has undergone rapid development in recent years and brings new challenges in data processing and analysis. This has led to an explosion of tailored analysis methods for scRNA-seq to address various biological questions. However, the current lack of gold-standard benchmarking datasets makes it difficult for researchers to evaluate the performance of the many methods available in a systematic manner. Here, we designed and generated a cross-platform benchmark dataset that has in-built truth in various forms and varying levels of biological noise. We used this dataset to compare different protocols and data analysis methods. We found that different protocols have different data quality and ERCC spike-in works independently to endogenous RNA. We found significant differences in the results from the methods compared and we associated the results with data characteristics to identify methods that perform well in different situations. Our dataset and analysis provide a valuable resource for algorithm selection in different biological settings.

2018-08-19 | GSE117450 | GEO

Designing a single cell RNA sequencing benchmark dataset to compare protocols and analysis methods

2019-12-19 | GSE142286 | GEO

Benchmarking single-cell hashtag oligo demultiplexing methods.

Project description:Sample multiplexing is often used to reduce cost and limit batch effects in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) experiments. A commonly used multiplexing technique involves tagging cells prior to pooling with a hashtag oligo (HTO) that can be sequenced along with the cells' RNA to determine their sample of origin. Several tools have been developed to demultiplex HTO sequencing data and assign cells to samples. In this study, we critically assess the performance of seven HTO demultiplexing tools: hashedDrops, HTODemux, GMM-Demux, demuxmix, deMULTIplex, BFF (bimodal flexible fitting) and HashSolo. The comparison uses data sets where each sample has also been demultiplexed using genetic variants from the RNA, enabling comparison of HTO demultiplexing techniques against complementary data from the genetic 'ground truth'. We find that all methods perform similarly where HTO labelling is of high quality, but methods that assume a bimodal count distribution perform poorly on lower quality data. We also suggest heuristic approaches for assessing the quality of HTO counts in an scRNA-seq experiment.

| S-EPMC10566318 | biostudies-literature

Designing a single cell RNA sequencing benchmark dataset to compare protocols and analysis methods (Cel_Seq)

2018-08-18 | GSE118704 | GEO

Benchmarking dataset for measurement and removal of index hopping artifacts in multiplexed droplet-based single-cell RNA-seq data

Project description:Sample index hopping refers to the incorrect sample assignment of a demultiplexed sequencing read in a library pool. To enable benchmarking of methods for measurement of index hopping rate and removal of its artifacts in single-cell RNA-seq data, we developed a validation dataset consisting of a multiplexed library of two samples, in which the true sample of origin of most reads are known. The reads with known sample of origin provide the ground truth for measuring the performance of index hopping correcting methods.

2020-05-09 | GSE149087 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data