Project description:This track displays a chromatin state segmentation for each of nine human cell types (http://hgwdev.cse.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgEncodeVocab?term=GM12878,H1-hESC,HepG2,HUVEC,HMEC,HSMM,K562,NHEK,NHLF). A common set of states across the cell types were learned by computationally integrating ChIP-seq data for nine factors plus input (http://hgwdev.cse.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgEncodeVocab?term=CTCF,H3K4me1,H3K4me2,H3K4me3,H3K27ac,H3K9ac,H3K36me3,H4K20me1,H3K27me3,Input) using a Hidden Markov Model (HMM). In total, fifteen states were used to segment the genome, and these states were then grouped and colored to highlight predicted functional elements. For data usage terms and conditions, please refer to http://www.genome.gov/27528022 and http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/ENCODE/ENCODEDataReleasePolicyFinal2008.pdf ChIP-seq data from the Broad Histone (http://hgwdev.cse.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgTrackUi?db=hg18&g=wgEncodeBroadChipSeq) track was used to generate this track. Data for nine factors plus input (http://hgwdev.cse.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgEncodeVocab?term=CTCF,H3K4me1,H3K4me2,H3K4me3,H3K27ac,H3K9ac,H3K36me3,H4K20me1,H3K27me3,Input) and nine cell types (http://hgwdev.cse.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgEncodeVocab?term=GM12878,H1-hESC,HepG2,HUVEC,HMEC,HSMM,K562,NHEK,NHLF) was binarized separately at a 200 base pair resolution based on a Poisson background model. The chromatin states were learned from this binarized data using a multivariate Hidden Markov Model (HMM) that explicitly models the combinatorial patterns of observed modifications (Ernst and Kellis, 2010). To learn a common set of states across the nine cell types, first the genomes were concatenated across the cell types. For each of the nine cell types, each 200 base pair interval was then assigned to its most likely state under the model. Detailed information about the model parameters and state enrichments can be found in (Ernst et al, accepted). This is release 1 (Jun 2011) of this track, and it is based on the NCBI36/hg18 release of the Broad Histone (http://hgwdev.cse.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgTrackUi?db=hg18&g=wgEncodeBroadChipSeq) track. This track has also been lifted over to GRCh37/hg19 (http://hgwdev.cse.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgTrackUi?db=hg19&g=wgEncodeBroadHmm). It is anticipated that the HMM methods will be run on the newer GRCh37/hg19 Broad Histone (http://hgwdev.cse.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgTrackUi?db=hg19&g=wgEncodeBroadHistone) data and will replace the lifted version.

Project description:This data was generated by ENCODE. If you have questions about the data, contact the submitting laboratory directly (Yin Shen mailto:y7shen@ucsd.edu). If you have questions about the Genome Browser track associated with this data, contact ENCODE (mailto:genome@soe.ucsc.edu). This track shows a comprehensive survey of cis-regulatory elements in the mouse genome by using ChIP-seq (Robertson et al., 2007) to identify transcription factor binding sites and chromatin modification profiles in many mouse (C57Bl/6) tissues and primary cells, including bone marrow, cerebellum, cortex, heart, kidney, liver, lung, spleen, mouse embryonic fibroblast cells (MEFs) and embryonic stem (ES) cells. In specific, the Ren lab examined RNA polymerase II (PolII), co-activator protein p300, the insulator protein CTCF, and two chromatin modification marks H3K4me3 and H3K4me1 due to their demonstrated utilities in identifying promoters, enhancers and insulator elements (Barski et al., 2007; Blow et al., 2010; Heintzman et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2005a; Visel et al., 2009). Enrichment of H3K4me3 or PolII signals is a strong indicator of active promoter, while the presence of p300 or H3K4me1 outside of promoter regions has been used as a mark for enhancers. CTCF binding sites are considered as a mark for potential insulator elements. For each transcription factor or chromatin mark in each tissue, ChIP-seq was carried out with at least two biological replicates. Each experiment produced 20-30 million monoclonal, uniquely mapped tags. For data usage terms and conditions, please refer to http://www.genome.gov/27528022 and http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/ENCODE/ENCODEDataReleasePolicyFinal2008.pdf Cells were grown according to the approved ENCODE cell culture protocols (http://hgwdev/ENCODE/protocols/cell/mouse). Enrichment and Library Preparation: Chromatin immunoprecipitation was performed according to Ren Lab ChIP Protocol (http://bioinformatics-renlab.ucsd.edu/RenLabChipProtocolV1.pdf). Library construction was performed according to Ren Lab Library Protocol (http://bioinformatics-renlab.ucsd.edu/RenLabLibraryProtocolV1.pdf). Sequencing and Analysis: Samples were sequenced on Illumina Genome Analyzer II Genome Analyzer IIx, and HiSeq 2000 platforms for 36 cycles. Image analysis, base calling and alignment to the mouse genome version mm9 were performed using Illumina's RTA and Genome Analyzer Pipeline software. Alignment to the mouse genome was performed using ELAND or Bowtie (Langmead et al., 2009) with a seed length of 25 and allowing up to two mismatches. Only the sequences that mapped to one location were used for further analysis. Of those sequences, clonal reads, defined as having the same start position on the same strand, were discarded. BED and wig files were created using custom perl scripts.

Dataset Information

Mus musculus

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets