Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Soil metagenome

ABSTRACT: Chronically hydrocarbon contaminated soil Raw sequence reads

PROVIDER: PRJNA306241 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR3038660.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR3038940.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR3038641.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR3038921.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR3038642.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 15

Similar Datasets

Soil metagenome from avocado orchards in Channybearup, Western Australia in 2024

Project description:Metagenome data from soil samples were collected at 0 to 10cm deep from 2 avocado orchards in Channybearup, Western Australia, in 2024. Amplicon sequence variant (ASV) tables were constructed based on the DADA2 pipeline with default parameters.

2025-06-15 | GSE298403 | GEO

soil metagenome

Project description:Uranium contaminated soil Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA310675 | ENA

soil metagenome

Project description:multi-contaminated soil Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA304082 | ENA

soil metagenome

Project description:TNT contaminated soil Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA289558 | ENA

soil metagenome

Project description:Aged-contaminated soil Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA324167 | ENA

Microarray analysis of high Arctic soil bacterial response to hydrocarbon pollution and bioremediation: genomic DNA

Project description:High Arctic soils have low nutrient availability, low moisture content and very low temperatures and, as such, they pose a particular problem in terms of hydrocarbon bioremediation. An in-depth knowledge of the microbiology involved in this process is likely to be crucial to understand and optimize the factors most influencing bioremediation. Here, we compared two distinct large-scale field bioremediation experiments, located at Alert (ex situ approach) and Eureka (in situ approach), in the Canadian high Arctic. Bacterial community structure and function were assessed using microarrays targeting the 16S rRNA genes of bacteria found in cold environments and hydrocarbon degradation genes as well as reverse-transcriptase real-time PCR targeting key functional genes. Results indicated a large difference between sampling sites in terms of both soil microbiology and decontamination rates. A rapid reorganization of the bacterial community structure and functional potential as well as rapid increases in the expression of alkane monooxygenases and polyaromatic hydrocarbon ring-hydroxylating-dioxygenases were observed one month after the bioremediation treatment commenced in the Alert soils. In contrast, no clear changes in community structure were observed in Eureka soils, while key gene expression increased after a relatively long lag period (1 year). Such discrepancies are likely caused by differences in bioremediation treatments (i.e. ex situ vs. in situ), weathering of the hydrocarbons, indigenous microbial communities, and environmental factors such as soil humidity and temperature. In addition, this study demonstrates the value of molecular tools for the monitoring of polar bacteria and their associated functions during bioremediation. 38 soil samples from two high arctic locations that were contaminated-treated, contaminated or not contaminated followed for up to 4 years

2010-05-15 | E-GEOD-17517 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Microarray analysis of high Arctic soil bacterial response to hydrocarbon pollution and bioremediation: 16S rRNA

2010-06-19 | E-GEOD-17532 | biostudies-arrayexpress

soil metagenome

Project description:arsenic contaminated paddy soil Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA288053 | ENA

soil metagenome

Project description:Cadmium-contaminated soil samples Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA361046 | ENA

soil metagenome

Project description:Alaska soil, PCB contaminated Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA294462 | ENA