High-throughput functional comparison of promoter and enhancer activities
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA309883 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR3124440.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR3124450.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR3124460.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR3124470.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR3124480.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 62 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Promoters initiate RNA synthesis, and enhancers stimulate promoter activity. Whether promoter and enhancer activities are encoded distinctly in DNA sequences is unknown. We measured the enhancer and promoter activities of thousands of DNA fragments transduced into mouse neurons. We focused on genomic loci bound by the neuronal activity-regulated co-activator CREBBP, and we measured enhancer and promoter activities both before and after neuronal activation. We find that the same sequences typically encode both enhancer and promoter activities. However, gene promoters generate more promoter activity than distal enhancers, despite generating similar enhancer activity. Surprisingly, the greater promoter activity of gene promoters is not due to conventional core promoter elements or splicing signals. Instead, we find that particular transcription factor binding motifs are intrinsically biased toward the generation of promoter activity, while others are not. While the specific biases we observe may be dependent on experimental or cellular context, our results suggest that gene promoters are distinguished from distal enhancers by specific complements of transcriptional activators.
2016-05-23 | GSE77213 | GEO
Project description:Promoters initiate RNA synthesis, and enhancers stimulate promoter activity. Whether promoter and enhancer activities are encoded distinctly in DNA sequences is unknown. We measured the enhancer and promoter activities of thousands of DNA fragments transduced into mouse neurons. We focused on genomic loci bound by the neuronal activity-regulated coactivator CREBBP, and we measured enhancer and promoter activities both before and after neuronal activation. We find that the same sequences typically encode both enhancer and promoter activities. However, gene promoters generate more promoter activity than distal enhancers, despite generating similar enhancer activity. Surprisingly, the greater promoter activity of gene promoters is not due to conventional core promoter elements or splicing signals. Instead, we find that particular transcription factor binding motifs are intrinsically biased toward the generation of promoter activity, whereas others are not. Although the specific biases we observe may be dependent on experimental or cellular context, our results suggest that gene promoters are distinguished from distal enhancers by specific complements of transcriptional activators.
| S-EPMC4971761 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The functional organization of eukaryotic genomes correlates with specific patterns of histone methylations. Regulatory regions in genomes like enhancers and promoters differ in their extent of methylation of histone H3 at lysine-4 (H3K4), but it is largely unknown how the different methylation states are specified and controlled. Here, we show that the Kdm5c/Jarid1c/SMCX member of the Kdm5 family of H3K4 demethylases can be recruited to both enhancer and promoter elements in embryonic stem cells and neuronal progenitor cells via gene-specific transcription factors. Knockdown of Kdm5c deregulates transcription via local increases in H3K4me3. Our data show that restricting H3K4me3 modification at core promoters dampens transcription, but Kdm5c is required at enhancers for their full activity. Remarkably, an impaired enhancer function activates the intrinsic promoter activity of Kdm5c-bound distal elements. Our results demonstrate that the Kdm5c demethylase plays a crucial and dynamic role in the functional discrimination between enhancers and core promoters. RNA from four independent cultures from each sh Kdm5c #1, sh Kdm5c #2 and non-targeting shRNA polyclonal cell lines were hybridized in dye-swap against a common reference of RNA from IB10 ES cells.
2013-04-05 | E-GEOD-38862 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Endogenous retrovirus LTR12C hold potential locus-dependent activities as promoter and/or enhancer
| PRJNA1018902 | ENA
Project description:Enhancer Cis Elements Instruct Promoter-Enhancer Interaction, Promoter-Enhancer Insulation and Compartmental Segregation
| PRJNA881254 | ENA
Project description:Long-range activation is an essential property of enhancers, yet the features determining long-range enhancer activities have not been systematically investigated due to a lack of high-throughput methods to measure long-range enhancer activities efficiently. To address this gap, we present a long-range massively parallel reporter assay (long-range MPRA), a genome-integrated assay allowing the measurement of hundreds of enhancers at multiple distances away from a promoter in parallel. The long-range MPRA assay features two independent landing pads, which allow for modular control over the genome-integrated promoter and enhancer libraries. We showcased the capability of long-range MPRA by testing over 300 K562 enhancers, as well as a set of enhancer combinations, at distances up to 100kb. We found that enhancers’ long-range activities are primarily determined by their intrinsic strength, with strong enhancers retaining more activity over long distances, while weak enhancers rapidly lose activity. Additionally, we found that GATA1-bound enhancers are more resistant to distance-dependent loss of activity, suggesting that TF binding also modulates long-range function. Finally, testing long-range enhancer activities with three different promoters (HBE, HBG and GAPDH) revealed that long-range E-P interactions rely on not only enhancer properties but also promoter responsiveness.
2025-04-15 | GSE294367 | GEO
Project description:The functional organization of eukaryotic genomes correlates with specific patterns of histone methylations. Regulatory regions in genomes like enhancers and promoters differ in their extent of methylation of histone H3 at lysine-4 (H3K4), but it is largely unknown how the different methylation states are specified and controlled. Here, we show that the Kdm5c/Jarid1c/SMCX member of the Kdm5 family of H3K4 demethylases can be recruited to both enhancer and promoter elements in embryonic stem cells and neuronal progenitor cells via gene-specific transcription factors. Knockdown of Kdm5c deregulates transcription via local increases in H3K4me3. Our data show that restricting H3K4me3 modification at core promoters dampens transcription, but Kdm5c is required at enhancers for their full activity. Remarkably, an impaired enhancer function activates the intrinsic promoter activity of Kdm5c-bound distal elements. Our results demonstrate that the Kdm5c demethylase plays a crucial and dynamic role in the functional discrimination between enhancers and core promoters.
2013-04-05 | GSE38862 | GEO
Project description:Accumulating evidence indicates that both promoters and enhancers are capable of exerting promoter and enhancer functions; however, the relationship between these two activities within individual elements and the determinants of this dual functionality remain poorly understood. We developed a massively parallel dual reporter assay that enables simultaneous assessment of the intrinsic promoter and enhancer potential exerted by the same sequence. Parallel quantification for thousands of elements reveals that canonical human promoters and enhancers can act as both promoters and enhancers under the same contexts, and that promoter activity may be necessary but not sufficient for enhancer function. Perturbations to element transcription factor binding motifs lead to disruptions in both activities, implicating a shared syntax for the two regulatory functions. Combinations of elements with different minimal promoters reveal reciprocal activity modulation, which, together with a strong correlation between promoter and enhancer functions, imply a bidirectional feedback loop to sustain environments of high transcriptional activity. Finally, we validate this reciprocity and correlation in situ using CRISPR activation at the human β-globin locus. Our approach reveals that the functional convergence between promoters and enhancers arises from a shared regulatory logic and sequence syntax, advancing a unified model for regulatory element biology.
2025-11-20 | GSE310760 | GEO
Project description:Remote enhancers are thought to interact with their target promoters via physical proximity, yet the importance of this proximity for enhancer function remains unclear. Here, we investigate the 3D conformation of enhancers during mammalian development by generating high-resolution tissue-resolved contact maps for nearly a thousand enhancers with characterized in vivo activities in ten murine embryonic tissues. 61% of developmental enhancers bypass their neighboring genes, which are often marked by promoter CpG methylation. The majority of enhancers display tissue-specific 3D conformations, and both enhancer–promoter and enhancer–enhancer interactions are moderately but consistently increased upon enhancer activation in vivo. Less than 14% of enhancer–promoter interactions form stably across tissues; however, these invariant interactions form in the absence of the enhancer and are likely mediated by adjacent CTCF binding. Our results highlight the general significance of enhancer–promoter physical proximity for developmental gene activation in mammals.
2024-01-03 | GSE217078 | GEO
Project description:The study uncovers epigenomic changes associated with dexamethasone response heterogeneity in myeloma cells, revealing rewired promoter-enhancer interactions and DNA loop stabilization
| EGAS00001007411 | EGA