Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain:CEN.PK

ABSTRACT: Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain:CEN.PK Transcriptome or Gene expression

PROVIDER: PRJNA378856 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR5337940.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR5337950.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR5337941.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR5337942.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR5337952.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 17

Similar Datasets

Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain:CEN.PK 2-1C

Project description:Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain:CEN.PK 2-1C Transcriptome or Gene expression

| PRJNA1155304 | ENA

Transcriptomic analysis of silver-resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant obtained by evolutionary engineering

Project description:Silver-resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant was obtained by evolutionary engineering method. Briefly, genetic diversity in reference strain, CEN.PK.113-7D, was increased by ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS)-mutagenesis. The mutant population was passaged several times in gradually increasing silver stress. Several mutant individuals were selected from the final population. Among selected mutant individuals, one of them was much more resistant to silver stress than the reference strain, called as 2E. Whole-genome transcriptomic analysis was performed to identify the silver resistance mechanisms in the silver-resistant mutant strain.

2020-01-09 | GSE143335 | GEO

Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain:CEN.PK 2-1C

Project description:Saccharomyces cerevisiae Transcriptome

| PRJNA1155854 | ENA

Transcriptomic analysis of an evolutionary strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae resistant to cobalt 10mM

Project description:We have employed whole genome microarray expression profiling as a discovery platform to identify genes implicated in the resistance to cobalt in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The evolved strains and the wild type were harvested in exponential phase WT (CEN.PK), the evolved strain (CI25E) and the evolved strain delta Cot1 harvested in exponential phase (DO 600nm=3) ; three independant replicate for each.

2012-07-31 | E-GEOD-39185 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Transcriptomic analysis of a propolis-resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain obtained by evolutionary engineering

Project description:A propolis-resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant strain was obtained using an evolutionary engineering strategy based on successive batch cultivation under gradually increasing propolis levels. The mutant strain FD 11 was selected at a propolis concentration that the reference strain could not grow at all. Whole-genome transcriptomic analysis of FD11 was performed with respect to its reference strain to determine differences in gene expression levels between the two strains. Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2024-11-07 | GSE280996 | GEO

Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain:CEN.PK2-1c

Project description:Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN.PK mutant Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA317015 | ENA

Transcriptomic analysis of sulfur dioxide stress-resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain obtained by evolutionary engineering

Project description:In this study, we have developed a highly SO2-stress-resistant yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) strain [F3] using evolutionary engineering, by successive batch selection at gradually increased SO2 levels. The evolved F3 strain was resistant to 1.0 mM SO2 stress, which was strongly inhibitory to the reference strain. Whole-transcriptomic analysis of F3 was performed with respect to its reference strain to determine differences in gene expression levels between the two strains. Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2025-05-15 | GSE292349 | GEO

Expression data of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN.PK.113-7D grew in Batch and Chemostat condition using for comparison of RNA-seq and Microarray data

Project description:High throughput sequencing is a powerful tool to investigate complex cellular phenotypes in functional genomics studies. Sequencing of transcriptional molecules, RNA-seq, has recently become an attractive method of choice in the studies of transcriptomes, promising several advantages compared to traditional expression analysis based on microarrays. In this study, we sought to assess the contribution of the different analytical steps involved in analysis of RNA-seq data and to cross-compare the results with those obtained through a microarray platform. We used the well-characterized Saccharomyces cervevisiae strain CEN.PK 113-7D grown under two different physiological conditions (batch and chemostat) as a case study. In our work, we addressed the influence of genetic variability on the estimation of gene expression level using three different aligners for read-mapping (Gsnap, Stampy and Tophat), the capabilities of five different statistical methods to detect differential gene expression (baySeq, Cuffdiff, DESeq, edgeR and noiSeq) and we explored the consistency between the two main approaches for RNA-seq: reference mapping and de novo assembly. High reproducibility in data generated through RNA-seq among different biological replicates (correlation ≥ 0.99) and high consistency with the results identified with RNA-seq and microarray data analysis (correlation ≥ 0.91) were observed. The results from differential gene expression identification as well as the results of integrated analysis based on the different methods are in good agreement. Overall, our study provides a useful and comprehensive comparison of the workflow for transcriptome analysis using RNA-seq technique.

2012-09-14 | GSE37599 | GEO

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Project description:Saccharomyces cerevisiae Transcriptome or Gene expression

| PRJNA814253 | ENA

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Project description:Saccharomyces cerevisiae Transcriptome or Gene expression

| PRJNA1108640 | ENA