Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

ABSTRACT: Saline soil microbiome study biases caused by different DNA extraction protocols

PROVIDER: PRJNA420000 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR6325740.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR6325750.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR6325760.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR6325770.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR6325741.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 36

Similar Datasets

Project description:Sequential DNA extraction for soil microbiome study

| PRJNA1327625 | ENA

Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic study

Project description:Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic study

| PRJEB38036 | ENA

Project description:Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies

| PRJEB37658 | ENA

A unified protocol for simultaneous extraction of DNA and proteins from archaeological dental calculus

Project description:Archaeological materials are a finite resource, and efforts should be made to minimize destructive analyses. This can be achieved by using protocols combining extraction of several lines of evidence, which decreases the material needed for analyses while maximizing the information yield. Archaeological dental calculus is a source of several different types of biomolecules, as well as microfossils, and can tell us about the human host, microbiome, diet, and even occupational activities. Here, we present a unified protocol allowing for simultaneous extraction of DNA and proteins from archaeological dental calculus. We evaluate the protocol on dental calculus from a range of ages and estimated preservation states, and compare it against standard DNA-only and protein-only protocols. We find that most aspects of downstream analyses are unaffected by the unified protocol, although minor shifts in the recovered proteome can be detected. Protein recovery depends on both the amount of starting material and choice of extraction protocol, whereas DNA recovery is significantly lowered through the unified protocol. However, DNA recovery from dental calculus is generally very high, and we found no differences in DNA fragment characteristics or taxonomic profile. In conclusion, the unified protocol allows for simultaneous extraction of two complementary lines of evidence from archaeological dental calculus without compromising downstream analyses, thereby minimizing the need for destructive analysis of this finite resource.

2020-04-27 | PXD015817 | Pride

Microalgal microbiome

Project description:Microalgal microbiome sequencing with three host species and four DNA extraction protocols

| PRJNA855439 | ENA

Project description:Comparison of DNA extraction protocols from stool samples

| PRJNA648321 | ENA

The effects from DNA extraction methods on the evaluation of microbial diversity associated with human colonic tissue

Project description:Recent advances in (meta)genomic methods have provided new opportunities to examine host-microbe-environment interactions in the human gut. While opportunities exist to extract DNA from freshly sourced colonic tissue there are potentially valuable sources of DNA from historical studies that might also be examined. We examined how four different tissue DNA extraction methods employed in past clinical trials might impact the recovery of microbial DNA from a colonic tissue sample as assessed using a custom designed phylogenetic microarray for human gut bacteria and archaebacteria. While all methods of DNA extraction produced similar phylogenetic profiles some extraction specific biases were also observed. Real time PCR analysis targeting several bacterial groups substantiated this observation. These data suggest that while the efficacy of different DNA extraction methods differs somewhat all the methods tested produce an accurate representation of microbial diversity. This suggests that DNA samples archived in biobanks should be suitable for retrospective analyses.

2010-01-01 | GSE18420 | GEO

PiGutNet Ring Test

Project description:Ring Test for fecal DNA extraction protocols in pigs

| PRJEB24564 | ENA

Metaproteomic datasets of wheat rhizosphere from saline and non-saline soils

Project description:We present metaproteome data from wheat rhizosphere from saline and non-saline soil. For collection and acquisition of metaproteome from wheat rhizosphere under saline and normal conditions, a survey was conducted in regions of Haryana, India. Samples from 65 days old plants (wheat var HD2967) were collected and pooled and based on EC,saline (NBAIM B; EC 6mS cm-1; pH 9.0; Bhaupur 2, Haryana, INDIA; 29°19'8"N;76°48'53"E) and normal soil samples (NBAIM C; EC 200 uS cm-1; pH 7.2; Near Nainform, Haryana, INDIA; 29°19'8"N;76°48'53"E) were selected for isolation of proteome with the standardized protocol at our laboratory followed by metaproteome analysis with the standardized pipepline. In total 1538 and 891 proteins were obtained from wheat rhizosphere from saline and non-saline respectively with the given parameters and software. Among 1410 proteins unique for saline soil, proteins responsible for glycine, serine and threonine metabolism and arginine and proline biosynthesis were found in saline and absent in non-saline. The present study extends knowledge about the physiology and adaptations of the wheat rhizosphere associated microbiota under saline soil.

2024-01-08 | PXD015387 | Pride

soil metagenome

Project description:soil samples - DNA extraction

| PRJNA354227 | ENA