PU.1 represses and activates gene expression in early T cells by redirection of transcription factor ensembles
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA432565 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR6048592.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6048593.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6048594.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6048595.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6048596.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 16 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:PU.1 represses and activates gene expression in early T cells by redirection of transcription factor ensembles [ChIP-Seq]
| PRJNA407770 | ENA
Project description:PU.1 represses and activates gene expression in early T cells by redirection of transcription factor ensembles [RNA-Seq]
| PRJNA432567 | ENA
Project description:Transcription factors normally regulate gene expression through their action at sites where they bind to DNA. However, the balance of activating and repressive functions that a transcription factor can mediate is not completely understood. Here, we show that PU.1 regulates gene expression in early stages of T-cell development both by recruiting partner transcription factors to its own binding sites and by depleting them from the binding sites that they may prefer when PU.1 is absent. Importantly, the loss of partner factors Satb1 and Runx1 occurs primarily from sites where PU.1 itself does not establish any detectable local binding. Genes linked to sites of partner factor ‘theft’ are enriched for considerable subsets of the genes PU.1 represses both in a model cell-line system and in normal T-cell development. Thus, system-level competitive recruitment dynamics permit PU.1 to affect gene expression both through own target sites and through action at a distance.
2018-03-14 | GSE103953 | GEO
Project description:Transcription factors normally regulate gene expression through their action at sites where they bind to DNA. However, the balance of activating and repressive functions that a transcription factor can mediate is not completely understood. Here, we show that PU.1 regulates gene expression in early stages of T-cell development both by recruiting partner transcription factors to its own binding sites and by depleting them from the binding sites that they may prefer when PU.1 is absent. Importantly, the loss of partner factors Satb1 and Runx1 occurs primarily from sites where PU.1 itself does not establish any detectable local binding. Genes linked to sites of partner factor ‘theft’ are enriched for considerable subsets of the genes PU.1 represses both in a model cell-line system and in normal T-cell development. Thus, system-level competitive recruitment dynamics permit PU.1 to affect gene expression both through own target sites and through action at a distance.
2018-03-14 | GSE110018 | GEO
Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.
2018-03-14 | GSE110020 | GEO
Project description:The physical manifestations of memory formation and recall are fundamental questions that remain unresolved. At the cellular level, ensembles of neurons called engrams are activated by learning events and control memory recall. Astrocytes are in close proximity to neurons and engage in a range of activities that support neurotransmission and circuit plasticity. Moreover, astrocytes exhibit experience dependent plasticity; however whether specific ensembles of astrocytes participate in memory recall remains obscure. Here we show that learning events induce c-Fos expression in a subset of hippocampal astrocytes, which subsequently regulates hippocampal circuit function. Intersectional, c-Fos based labeling of these astrocyte ensembles after learning events reveals that they are closely affiliated with engram neurons, while re-activation of these astrocyte ensembles stimulates memory recall. At the molecular level, these astrocyte ensembles exhibit elevated expression of NFIA and its selective deletion from this population suppresses memory recall. Together, our studies identify learning-associated astrocyte ensembles as a new form of plasticity that is sufficient to provoke memory recall, while implicating astrocytes as a reservoir for the storage of memories.
2024-06-30 | GSE254016 | GEO
Project description:Transcription factors normally regulate gene expression through their action at sites where they bind to DNA. However, the balance of activating and repressive functions that a transcription factor can mediate is not completely understood. Here, we showed that the transcription factor PU.1 regulated gene expression in early T cell development both by recruiting partner transcription factors to its own binding sites and by depleting them from the binding sites that they preferred when PU.1 was absent. The removal of partner factors Satb1 and Runx1 occurred primarily from sites where PU.1 itself did not bind. Genes linked to sites of partner factor "theft" were enriched for genes that PU.1 represses despite lack of binding, both in a model cell line system and in normal T cell development. Thus, system-level competitive recruitment dynamics permit PU.1 to affect gene expression both through its own target sites and through action at a distance.
| S-EPMC6063530 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Maladaptive reward seeking is a hallmark of cocaine use disorder. To develop therapeutic targets, it is critical to understand the neurobiological changes specific to cocaine-seeking without altering the seeking of natural rewards, e.g., sucrose. The prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the nucleus accumbens core (NAcore) are known regions associated with cocaine- and sucrose-seeking ensembles, i.e., a sparse population of co-activated neurons. Within ensembles, transcriptomic alterations in the PFC and NAcore underlie the learning and persistence of cocaine- and sucrose-seeking behavior. However, transcriptomes exclusively driving cocaine seeking independent from sucrose seeking have not yet been defined using a within-subject approach. Using Ai14:cFos-TRAP2 transgenic mice in a dual cocaine and sucrose self-administration model, we fluorescently sorted (FACS) and characterized (RNAseq) the transcriptomes defining cocaine- and sucrose-seeking ensembles. We found reward- and region-specific transcriptomic changes that will help develop clinically relevant genetic approaches to decrease cocaine-seeking behavior without altering non-drug reward-based positive reinforcement.
2023-11-08 | GSE247029 | GEO
Project description:A major problem with linking transcription factor binding to function is that many factors bind to a large number of, at least in any given cell type, seemingly irrelevant regions. This makes it hard to filter out which binding sites are responsible for the regulation of a given gene. PU.1 (Spi1, Sfpi1) is an excellent example of a transcription factor that works both to mediate developmental choices and to serve the alternative developmental fates that emerge from these choices. Its role in T-cell development is confined to the early stages where high PU.1 expression persists through multiple cell divisions and is sharply downregulated over the DN2a-to-DN2b T-cell commitment stage. Even though it is known that PU.1 is necessary for the survival of the earliest T-cell progenitors, where it is needed for optimal proliferation, control of alternative lineage genes, and correct timing of the access to T-lineage genes, it has not been well-studied how PU.1 finds it targets and exerts its functions within this context. Here, we show in detail how PU.1 selects its binding sites and subsequently regulate gene expression. We show that PU.1 has two effective affinity thresholds for occupancy depending on current chromatin openness as measured by ATAC-sequencing, but that it is easily capable of binding sites in closed chromatin. Unexpectedly, although its binding to promoters is least constrained, promoters are the only major class of sites where it exerts a predominantly negative effect; otherwise it works locally as an activator, mainly mediated through binding to sites in closed or dynamically closing distal enhancer elements, where it can rapidly open chromatin and induce histone acetylation. However, its ability to open the chromatin depends not only on its own affinity but also on the presence of collaborating factors, because we show that PU.1 introduction into PU.1-negative cells triggers a massive reorganization of occupancy patterns of at least three other factors: Runx1, Satb1, and Gata3. Most strikingly, PU.1’s “theft” of Runx1 and Satb1 from many sites where they were binding in the absence of PU.1 enables PU.1 to exert a novel form of repression even on genes where it has no binding sites itself. We show here that PU.1 requires domains outside of its DNA binding domain to properly open chromatin, and this structural requirement is directly connected with its ability to bind to Runx1 and to Satb1, and moreover, Runx1, in particular, is an important collaborator to activate many of its target genes in the context of early T-cell development. Thus, PU.1 regulates gene expression via two distinct mechanisms. First, PU.1 steals Satb1 and Runx1 from many genomic sites, thereby repressing T cell gene expression indirectly. Second, PU.1, opens chromatin, recruits Satb1 and Runx1 to new sites, and directly activates its target gene expression. In summary, we here present a model where a transcription factor can work through redeployment of other factors and not only through sites that it binds itself.
2018-06-21 | GSE93755 | GEO