Arsenic contaminated soil
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA432647 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR6685790.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6685800.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6685810.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6685820.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6685791.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 42 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Arsenic-contaminated soil metagenome Raw sequence reads
| PRJNA1255126 | ENA
Project description:Arsenic contaminated groundwater Raw sequence reads
| PRJNA481093 | ENA
Project description:RNA from stem containing first node and internodes during dough stage was considered for the above purpose. Satabdi, (popularly known as Minikit) most popular cultivar of West Bengal and Palman, another high yielding variety were considered for microarray analysis for comparison to each other. Two rice genotypes were grown in identical conditions (same field with contaminated ground water) to obtain the most meaningful conclusion. Dough stage was considered as variation in arsenic accumulation among the genotypes starts during dough stage to maturity. Plant tissues were collected from stem for transcriptomic analysis as expression profiling of such tissue in response to arsenic would be most useful as arsenic transport/loading in grain was assumed to be controlled by arsenic translocation behavior at inter vascular level or from xylem to phloem. Satabdi accumulates more than twice of arsenic in brown rice (0.346 mg/kg) than that of Palman (0.156 mg/kg) whereas accumulation in straw (2.07 mg/kg) was approximately less than half of the Palman (4.491 mg/kg)
2014-01-17 | E-MTAB-2106 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Comparison of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) contaminated soils from Spain with a community-specific microarray. These results are being submitted for publication and represent the first use of microarrays for analysis of soil DNA and the first community-specific microarray design. Keywords: other
2004-11-19 | GSE1985 | GEO
Project description:Microbial arsenic cycling in Italian contaminated groundwaters
| PRJNA507727 | ENA
Project description:Comparison of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) contaminated soils from Spain with a community-specific microarray. These results are being submitted for publication and represent the first use of microarrays for analysis of soil DNA and the first community-specific microarray design. Keywords: other
2010-06-05 | E-GEOD-1985 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:High Arctic soils have low nutrient availability, low moisture content and very low temperatures and, as such, they pose a particular problem in terms of hydrocarbon bioremediation. An in-depth knowledge of the microbiology involved in this process is likely to be crucial to understand and optimize the factors most influencing bioremediation. Here, we compared two distinct large-scale field bioremediation experiments, located at Alert (ex situ approach) and Eureka (in situ approach), in the Canadian high Arctic. Bacterial community structure and function were assessed using microarrays targeting the 16S rRNA genes of bacteria found in cold environments and hydrocarbon degradation genes as well as reverse-transcriptase real-time PCR targeting key functional genes. Results indicated a large difference between sampling sites in terms of both soil microbiology and decontamination rates. A rapid reorganization of the bacterial community structure and functional potential as well as rapid increases in the expression of alkane monooxygenases and polyaromatic hydrocarbon ring-hydroxylating-dioxygenases were observed one month after the bioremediation treatment commenced in the Alert soils. In contrast, no clear changes in community structure were observed in Eureka soils, while key gene expression increased after a relatively long lag period (1 year). Such discrepancies are likely caused by differences in bioremediation treatments (i.e. ex situ vs. in situ), weathering of the hydrocarbons, indigenous microbial communities, and environmental factors such as soil humidity and temperature. In addition, this study demonstrates the value of molecular tools for the monitoring of polar bacteria and their associated functions during bioremediation. 38 soil samples from two high arctic locations that were contaminated-treated, contaminated or not contaminated followed for up to 4 years
2010-05-15 | E-GEOD-17517 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:High Arctic soils have low nutrient availability, low moisture content and very low temperatures and, as such, they pose a particular problem in terms of hydrocarbon bioremediation. An in-depth knowledge of the microbiology involved in this process is likely to be crucial to understand and optimize the factors most influencing bioremediation. Here, we compared two distinct large-scale field bioremediation experiments, located at Alert (ex situ approach) and Eureka (in situ approach), in the Canadian high Arctic. Bacterial community structure and function were assessed using microarrays targeting the 16S rRNA genes of bacteria found in cold environments and hydrocarbon degradation genes as well as reverse-transcriptase real-time PCR targeting key functional genes. Results indicated a large difference between sampling sites in terms of both soil microbiology and decontamination rates. A rapid reorganization of the bacterial community structure and functional potential as well as rapid increases in the expression of alkane monooxygenases and polyaromatic hydrocarbon ring-hydroxylating-dioxygenases were observed one month after the bioremediation treatment commenced in the Alert soils. In contrast, no clear changes in community structure were observed in Eureka soils, while key gene expression increased after a relatively long lag period (1 year). Such discrepancies are likely caused by differences in bioremediation treatments (i.e. ex situ vs. in situ), weathering of the hydrocarbons, indigenous microbial communities, and environmental factors such as soil humidity and temperature. In addition, this study demonstrates the value of molecular tools for the monitoring of polar bacteria and their associated functions during bioremediation. 38 soil samples from two high arctic locations that were contaminated-treated, contaminated or not contaminated followed for up to 4 years
2010-06-19 | E-GEOD-17532 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Microbial community analysis with DNA oligonucleotide microarrays targeting ribosomal RNA (rRNA) provides a highly parallel interrogation of nucleic acids isolated from environmental samples. High fidelity readout is essential for accurate interpretation of hybridisations. We describe the hybridisation of in vitro transcribed 16S rRNA from an uncontaminated and 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene contaminated soil to an oligonucleotide microarray containing group- and species-specific perfect match (PM) probes and their 2 corresponding mismatch (MM) probes. Thermal dissociation analysis was used to determine the specificity of each PM-MM probe set. Functional ANOVA often discriminated PM-MM probe sets when Td values (temperature at 50% probe-target dissociation) could not. Maximum discrimination for many PM and MM probes often occurred at temperatures greater than the Td. Comparison of signal intensities measured prior to dissociation analysis from hybridisations of the two soil samples revealed significant differences in domain-, group- and species-specific probes. Functional ANOVA showed significantly different dissociation curves for 11 PM probes when hybridisations from the two soil samples were compared, even though initial signal intensities for 3 of the 11 did not vary. This approach provides a highly parallel, multi-level analysis that incorporates MM probes and dissociation curves into high fidelity microarray analysis of complex environmental nucleic acid profiles. Keywords: Microbial diversity, thermal dissociation analysis
2005-10-26 | GSE3499 | GEO
Project description:As-contaminated soil microbial community diversity
| PRJNA432275 | ENA