The bipartite TAD organization of the X-inactivation centre ensures opposing developmental regulation of Tsix and Xist
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA436159 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR6788360.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6788370.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6788380_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6788380_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6788390_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 116 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:The mouse X-inactivation center (Xic) locus represents a powerful model for understanding the links between genome architecture and gene regulation, with the non-coding genes Xist and Tsix showing opposite developmental expression patterns while being organized as an overlapping sense/antisense unit. The Xic is organized into two topologically associating domains (TADs) but the role of this architecture in orchestrating cis-regulatory information remains elusive. To explore this, we generated genomic inversions within the Xic that swap the Xist/Tsix transcriptional unit and place their promoters in each other’s TAD. We found that this led to a switch in their expression dynamics: Xist became precociously and ectopically up-regulated, both in male and female pluripotent cells, while Tsix expression aberrantly persisted during differentiation. The topological partitioning of the Xic is thus critical to ensure proper developmental timing of X-inactivation. Our study illustrates how genomic architecture can hardwire the potential for mammalian developmental regulation by cis-regulatory landscapes.
2019-05-27 | GSE111205 | GEO
Project description:The mouse X-inactivation center (Xic) locus represents a powerful model for understanding the links between genome architecture and gene regulation, with the non-coding genes Xist and Tsix showing opposite developmental expression patterns while being organized as an overlapping sense/antisense unit. The Xic is organized into two topologically associating domains (TADs) but the role of this architecture in orchestrating cis-regulatory information remains elusive. To explore this, we generated genomic inversions that swap the Xist/Tsix transcriptional unit and place their promoters in each other's TAD. We found that this led to a switch in their expression dynamics: Xist became precociously and ectopically upregulated, both in male and female pluripotent cells, while Tsix expression aberrantly persisted during differentiation. The topological partitioning of the Xic is thus critical to ensure proper developmental timing of X inactivation. Our study illustrates how the genomic architecture of cis-regulatory landscapes can affect the regulation of mammalian developmental processes.
| S-EPMC6551226 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A TAD boundary at the HoxD locus segregates opposing limb regulatory landscapes and their target genes
| PRJNA395249 | ENA
Project description:Opposing activity of SOX9 and Wnt in the developing otocyst ensures SOX10 control of endolymphatic development
| PRJNA1133744 | ENA
Project description:Genome organization is driven by forces affecting transcriptional state, but the relationship between transcription and genome architecture remains unclear. Here, we identified the Drosophila transcription factor Motif 1 Binding Protein (M1BP) in physical association with the gypsy chromatin insulator core complex, including the universal insulator protein CP190. M1BP is required for enhancer-blocking and barrier activities of the gypsy insulator as well as its proper nuclear localization. Genome-wide, M1BP specifically colocalizes with CP190 at Motif 1-containing promoters, which are enriched at topologically associating domain (TAD) borders. M1BP facilitates CP190 chromatin binding at many shared sites and vice versa. Both factors promote Motif 1-dependent gene expression and transcription near TAD borders genome-wide. Finally, loss of M1BP reduces chromatin accessibility and increases both inter- and intra-TAD local genome compaction. Our results reveal physical and functional interaction between CP190 and M1BP to activate transcription at TAD borders and mediate chromatin insulator-dependent genome organization.
2021-06-07 | PXD026497 | Pride
Project description:The mammalian HoxD cluster is positioned at the boundary between two topologically associating domains (TADs), each of them matching a distinct, enhancer-rich regulatory landscape. During limb development, the telomeric TAD controls the early phase of Hoxd gene transcription in future forearm cells, whereas the centromeric TAD subsequently regulates transcription of more posterior Hoxd genes in presumptive digit cells. The TAD boundary is essential as it prevents the terminal Hoxd13 gene to respond to potent forearm enhancers, thereby allowing the formation of proper proximal limb structures. Here we apply chromosome conformation capture onto embryonic proximal and distal limb bud cells micro-dissected from a set of nested deletions involving part- or all- of this boundary region to try to understand the nature and function of this CTCF- and cohesin-rich DNA region. We document a progressive release of the boundary effect, allowing for inter-TAD contacts to be established, which were favoured by the functional status of the newly accessed enhancers. However, the boundary was highly resilient and only a 400kb large deletion including the whole gene cluster was eventually able to merge the two neighbouring TADs into a single structure. We propose that the whole HoxD cluster is a dynamic transcriptional boundary, showing slight variations depending on both the transcriptional status and the ontogenetic context
2017-12-22 | GSE101715 | GEO
Project description:The mammalian HoxD cluster is positioned at the boundary between two topologically associating domains (TADs), each of them matching a distinct, enhancer-rich regulatory landscape. During limb development, the telomeric TAD controls the early phase of Hoxd gene transcription in future forearm cells, whereas the centromeric TAD subsequently regulates transcription of more posterior Hoxd genes in presumptive digit cells. The TAD boundary is essential as it prevents the terminal Hoxd13 gene to respond to potent forearm enhancers, thereby allowing the formation of proper proximal limb structures. Here we apply chromosome conformation capture onto embryonic proximal and distal limb bud cells micro-dissected from a set of nested deletions involving part- or all- of this boundary region to try to understand the nature and function of this CTCF- and cohesin-rich DNA region. We document a progressive release of the boundary effect, allowing for inter-TAD contacts to be established, which were favoured by the functional status of the newly accessed enhancers. However, the boundary was highly resilient and only a 400kb large deletion including the whole gene cluster was eventually able to merge the two neighbouring TADs into a single structure. We propose that the whole HoxD cluster is a dynamic transcriptional boundary, showing slight variations depending on both the transcriptional status and the ontogenetic context
2017-12-22 | GSE101714 | GEO
Project description:The mammalian HoxD cluster is positioned at the boundary between two topologically associating domains (TADs), each of them matching a distinct, enhancer-rich regulatory landscape. During limb development, the telomeric TAD controls the early phase of Hoxd gene transcription in future forearm cells, whereas the centromeric TAD subsequently regulates transcription of more posterior Hoxd genes in presumptive digit cells. The TAD boundary is essential as it prevents the terminal Hoxd13 gene to respond to potent forearm enhancers, thereby allowing the formation of proper proximal limb structures. Here we apply chromosome conformation capture onto embryonic proximal and distal limb bud cells micro-dissected from a set of nested deletions involving part- or all- of this boundary region to try to understand the nature and function of this CTCF- and cohesin-rich DNA region. We document a progressive release of the boundary effect, allowing for inter-TAD contacts to be established, which were favoured by the functional status of the newly accessed enhancers. However, the boundary was highly resilient and only a 400kb large deletion including the whole gene cluster was eventually able to merge the two neighbouring TADs into a single structure. We propose that the whole HoxD cluster is a dynamic transcriptional boundary, showing slight variations depending on both the transcriptional status and the ontogenetic context
2017-12-22 | GSE101713 | GEO
Project description:Pervasive RNA Binding Protein Enrichment on TAD Boundaries Regulates TAD Organization
| PRJNA1018867 | ENA
Project description:The genome is partitioned into Topologically Associating Domains (TADs). About half of the boundaries of these TADs exhibit transcriptional activity and are correlated with better TAD insulation. However, the association between these transcripts and TAD insulation, enhancer:promoter interactions and transcription of genes remains unknown. Here we investigate the functional roles of these bRNAs (boundary-RNA) in boundary insulation and consequent effects on enhancer-promoter interactions and TAD transcription genome-wide and more specifically on the disease relevant INK4a/ARF TAD. Using a series of CTCF site deletions and bRNA knockdown experiments at this TAD boundary, we show a direct association of CTCF with the bidirectional bRNAs where the loss of bRNA triggers the concomitant loss of: CTCF at the TAD boundary, its insulation, enhancer:promoter interactions and gene transcription within the targeted TAD. We used another series of enhancer deletions and CRISPRi on promoters within INK4a/ARF TAD to better understand the regulation and origins of bRNA itself. We observe that the enhancers interact with boundaries and positively regulate the bRNA transcription at TAD boundaries. In return, the bRNAs recruit/stabilize the CTCF even on weak motifs within these boundaries and supports CTCF binding in clusters, therefore enhancing TAD insulation. This favors the intra-TAD enhancer:promoter interactions and leads to robust gene transcription. Functionally, bRNAs are more stable than eRNAs and their knockdown exactly mimics the CTCF site deletion. Furthermore, transcribing boundaries exhibit high TAD transcription in TCGA tumour datasets. Together, these results show that active enhancers directly mediate better insulation of TADs by activating the transcription at TAD boundaries triggering CTCF clustering at the boundary which results in better insulation and favours robust intra-TAD enhancer:promoter interactions to activate the gene transcription.
2022-12-28 | GSE180659 | GEO