SRNA-mRNA pairing in absence of the RNA chaperone Hfq
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA453159 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR7059130_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR7059130_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR7059131_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR7059131_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR7059132_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 24 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:The RNA chaperone Hfq is regarded as a critical effector promoting interaction between small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) and cognate target mRNAs. While much of this interpretation is based on in vitro assays, no in vivo evidence actually exists to support this model. Here we report that Hfq is typically unnecessary for binding of various sRNA-mRNA complexes in vivo. Data obtained from pull-downs of MS2-tagged RyhB, RybB and DsrA sRNAs followed by RNAseq identification of target mRNAs suggest that absence of Hfq is not essential for sRNA-mRNA complex formation in vivo.
2021-09-22 | GSE113589 | GEO
Project description:The RNA chaperone Hfq is regarded as a critical effector promoting interaction between small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) and cognate target mRNAs. While much of this interpretation is based on in vitro assays, no in vivo evidence actually exists to support this model. Here we report that Hfq is typically unnecessary for binding of various sRNA-mRNA complexes in vivo. Data obtained from pull-downs of MS2-tagged RyhB, RybB and DsrA sRNAs followed by RNAseq identification of target mRNAs suggest that absence of Hfq is not essential for sRNA-mRNA complex formation in vivo.
2021-09-22 | GSE113591 | GEO
Project description:The RNA chaperone Hfq is regarded as a critical effector promoting interaction between small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) and cognate target mRNAs. While much of this interpretation is based on in vitro assays, no in vivo evidence actually exists to support this model. Here we report that Hfq is typically unnecessary for binding of various sRNA-mRNA complexes in vivo. Data obtained from pull-downs of MS2-tagged RyhB, RybB and DsrA sRNAs followed by RNAseq identification of target mRNAs suggest that absence of Hfq is not essential for sRNA-mRNA complex formation in vivo.
2021-09-22 | GSE113587 | GEO
Project description:DsrA-mRNA pairing in absence of the RNA chaperone Hfq in vivo
| PRJNA453156 | ENA
Project description:RybB-mRNA pairing in absence of the RNA chaperone Hfq in vivo
| PRJNA453157 | ENA
Project description:RyhB-mRNA pairing in absence of the RNA chaperone Hfq in vivo
| PRJNA453186 | ENA
Project description:Most bacterial small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) modulate gene expression by forming complementary base pairs with target mRNAs, a process that is heavily reliant on the RNA chaperone Hfq in many microbes. Hfq, with its three distinct RNA-binding faces (proximal, rim, and distal), facilitates the simultaneous binding of sRNAs and target mRNAs, with each face providing specific interactions to promote pairing. However, the precise contributions of each Hfq face to RNA binding and sRNA-mRNA annealing in vivo remain unclear. Here, we systematically examined the functional impact of point mutations in chromomally-encoded Flag-tagged Hfq using the RNA Interaction by Ligation and Sequencing (RIL-seq) approach. While substantial numbers of sRNA-mRNA chimeras were detected for most Hfq face mutants, the rim face mutant R16A exhibited a near-complete loss of chimeras, even though functional assays confirmed that Hfq R16A retains partial regulatory activity. Further RIL-seq analysis demonstrated that the addition of the Flag tag did not significantly alter chimera formation or contribute to the loss of chimeras in R16A, and RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (RIP-seq) analysis showed that R16A maintains partial RNA-binding activity. Using intracellular RIL-seq (iRIL-seq), a method with fewer in vitro processing steps after Hfq immunoprecipitation, we identified significantly more sRNA-mRNA chimeras in R16A compared to standard RIL-seq, indicating that the rim face plays a key role in stabilizing RNA pairs on Hfq. Our findings provide a comprehensive analysis of how the RNA-binding faces of Hfq contribute to sRNA stability and pairing in vivo and the unique function of the rim face. Additionally, we highlight the strengths of different RNA ligation-based sequencing approaches, with RIL-seq effectively capturing stable Hfq-associated interactions, while iRIL-seq captured more transient RNA pairings.
2025-12-17 | GSE296796 | GEO
Project description:Most bacterial small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) modulate gene expression by forming complementary base pairs with target mRNAs, a process that is heavily reliant on the RNA chaperone Hfq in many microbes. Hfq, with its three distinct RNA-binding faces (proximal, rim, and distal), facilitates the simultaneous binding of sRNAs and target mRNAs, with each face providing specific interactions to promote pairing. However, the precise contributions of each Hfq face to RNA binding and sRNA-mRNA annealing in vivo remain unclear. Here, we systematically examined the functional impact of point mutations in chromomally-encoded Flag-tagged Hfq using the RNA Interaction by Ligation and Sequencing (RIL-seq) approach. While substantial numbers of sRNA-mRNA chimeras were detected for most Hfq face mutants, the rim face mutant R16A exhibited a near-complete loss of chimeras, even though functional assays confirmed that Hfq R16A retains partial regulatory activity. Further RIL-seq analysis demonstrated that the addition of the Flag tag did not significantly alter chimera formation or contribute to the loss of chimeras in R16A, and RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (RIP-seq) analysis showed that R16A maintains partial RNA-binding activity. Using intracellular RIL-seq (iRIL-seq), a method with fewer in vitro processing steps after Hfq immunoprecipitation, we identified significantly more sRNA-mRNA chimeras in R16A compared to standard RIL-seq, indicating that the rim face plays a key role in stabilizing RNA pairs on Hfq. Our findings provide a comprehensive analysis of how the RNA-binding faces of Hfq contribute to sRNA stability and pairing in vivo and the unique function of the rim face. Additionally, we highlight the strengths of different RNA ligation-based sequencing approaches, with RIL-seq effectively capturing stable Hfq-associated interactions, while iRIL-seq captured more transient RNA pairings.
2025-12-17 | GSE296795 | GEO
Project description:Most bacterial small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) modulate gene expression by forming complementary base pairs with target mRNAs, a process that is heavily reliant on the RNA chaperone Hfq in many microbes. Hfq, with its three distinct RNA-binding faces (proximal, rim, and distal), facilitates the simultaneous binding of sRNAs and target mRNAs, with each face providing specific interactions to promote pairing. However, the precise contributions of each Hfq face to RNA binding and sRNA-mRNA annealing in vivo remain unclear. Here, we systematically examined the functional impact of point mutations in chromomally-encoded Flag-tagged Hfq using the RNA Interaction by Ligation and Sequencing (RIL-seq) approach. While substantial numbers of sRNA-mRNA chimeras were detected for most Hfq face mutants, the rim face mutant R16A exhibited a near-complete loss of chimeras, even though functional assays confirmed that Hfq R16A retains partial regulatory activity. Further RIL-seq analysis demonstrated that the addition of the Flag tag did not significantly alter chimera formation or contribute to the loss of chimeras in R16A, and RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (RIP-seq) analysis showed that R16A maintains partial RNA-binding activity. Using intracellular RIL-seq (iRIL-seq), a method with fewer in vitro processing steps after Hfq immunoprecipitation, we identified significantly more sRNA-mRNA chimeras in R16A compared to standard RIL-seq, indicating that the rim face plays a key role in stabilizing RNA pairs on Hfq. Our findings provide a comprehensive analysis of how the RNA-binding faces of Hfq contribute to sRNA stability and pairing in vivo and the unique function of the rim face. Additionally, we highlight the strengths of different RNA ligation-based sequencing approaches, with RIL-seq effectively capturing stable Hfq-associated interactions, while iRIL-seq captured more transient RNA pairings.
2025-12-17 | GSE296794 | GEO
Project description:Bacterial small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) regulate gene expression by base-pairing to their target mRNAs. In Escherichia coli and many other bacteria, this process is dependent on the RNA chaperone Hfq, which binds sRNAs and mRNAs on different faces. YhbS (renamed here as HqbA), a putative Gcn5-related N-acetyltransferase (GNAT), was identified as a novel silencer of sRNA signaling in a genomic library screen. Here, we studied how HqbA regulates sRNA signaling and determined its physiological roles in modulating Hfq activity. Using fluorescent reporter assays, we found that HqbA overproduction suppresses all tested Hfq-dependent sRNA signaling. Chromosomal HqbA suppresses the signaling of the ChiX sRNA when the C-terminus of Hfq was deleted. Direct interaction between HqbA and Hfq was demonstrated both in vivo and in vitro, and mutants that blocked interaction also interfered with HqbA suppression of Hfq. However, an acetylation-deficient HqbA mutant still disrupted sRNA signaling, suggesting that HqbA is bifunctional, with separate roles for regulating via Hfq interaction and via acetylation of undefined substrates. Gel shift assays indicated that HqbA strongly reduced the interaction between the Hfq distal face and low-affinity RNAs, but not high-affinity RNAs. Hfq-IP RNA-Seq in WT and chromosomal hqbA mutants led to the identification of two tRNA precursors, metZWV and proM, that were enriched in Hfq binding in the absence of HqbA interaction. Our results suggest that HqbA provides a level of quality control for Hfq by competing with low-affinity RNA binders.
2023-11-13 | GSE235194 | GEO