Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4741
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA573518 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR10298049.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR10298050.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR10298051.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR10298052.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR10298053.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 438 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Genome-wide nucleosome specificity and directionality of chromatin remodelers
| PRJNA189244 | ENA
Project description:H3 ChIP and input DNA were hybridized to Affymetrix GeneChip S. cerevisiae Tiling 1.0R Array Genome-wide mapping of nucleosomes generated by micrococcal nuclease (MNase) suggests that yeast promoter and terminator regions are very depleted of nucleosomes, predominantly because their DNA sequences intrinsically disfavor nucleosome formation. However, MNase has strong DNA sequence specificity that favors cleavage at promoters and terminators and accounts for some of the correlation between occupancy patterns of nucleosomes assembled in vivo and in vitro. Using an improved method for measuring nucleosome occupancy in vivo that does not involve MNase, we confirm that promoter regions are strongly depleted of nucleosomes, but find that terminator regions are much less depleted than expected. Unlike at promoter regions, nucleosome occupancy at terminators is strongly correlated with the orientation of and distance to adjacent genes. In addition, nucleosome occupancy at terminators is strongly affected by growth conditions, indicating that it is not primarily determined by intrinsic histone-DNA interactions. Rapid removal of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) causes increased nucleosome occupancy at terminators, strongly suggesting a transcription-based mechanism of nucleosome depletion. However, the distinct behavior of terminator regions and their corresponding coding regions suggests that nucleosome depletion at terminators is not simply associated with passage of Pol II, but rather involves a distinct mechanism linked to 3’ end formation.
2010-09-21 | GSE23778 | GEO
Project description:Genowide-wide analysis of scc2-4 binding.
| PRJNA239407 | ENA
Project description:Measurement of decoding times of all codons in vivo
| PRJNA254353 | ENA
Project description:Thousands of protein domains encoded in the human genome function by binding up to a million short linear motifs embedded in intrinsically disordered regions of other proteins. How affinity and specificity are encoded in these binding domains and the motifs themselves is not well understood. The evolvability of binding specificity - how rapidly and extensively it can change upon mutation - is also largely unexplored, as is the contribution of ‘fuzzy’ dynamic residues to affinity and specificity in protein-protein interactions. Here we produce the first global map of affinity and specificity encoding in a globular protein domain. Quantifying >200,000 energetic interactions between the domain and ligand allows us to identify 20 major energetically coupled pairs of sites. These are organised into six modules, with the vast majority of mutations in each module only reprogramming specificity for a single position in the ligand. Nine of the major energetic couplings encoding specificity are direct structural contacts and 11 have an allosteric mechanism of action. The dynamic tail of the ligand is more robust to mutation than the structured portion but contributes additively to binding affinity and communicates with structured residues to enable changes in specificity. Our results present how affinity and specificity are encoded in a globular protein domain interacting with a disordered peptide and a direct comparison of the encoding of affinity and specificity in structured and dynamic molecular recognition.
2024-04-25 | GSE265816 | GEO
Project description:Learning the regulatory grammar of yeast 5' untranslated regions from a large library of random sequences
| PRJNA414643 | ENA
Project description:Rrp5 binding at multiple sites coordinates pre-rRNA processing and assembly
| PRJNA207103 | ENA
Project description:Genomic regions flanking E-box sites influence DNA binding specificity of bHLH transcription factors through DNA shape (validation)
| PRJNA190630 | ENA
Project description:Transcription factors (TFs) bind DNA through sequence-specific DNA-binding domains (DBDs), yet genome-wide analyses show that TFs occupy only a small fraction of their motif occurrences. This raises the question of how TFs distinguish specific targets from the many potential sites in the genome. To investigate determinants of binding specificity beyond the cognate motif and cofactor influences, we measured the binding of 60 human TFs across the budding yeast genome. Although human TFs robustly recognized their motifs, they displayed strong selectivity in site occupancy. Nucleosome abundance explained this selectivity only in part: among the 5-20% of motif sites that were bound, a substantial fraction remained nucleosome covered. Furthermore, TFs recognizing similar motif sequences independently localized to distinct subsets of sites within different promoters. Despite the absence of human-specific cofactors in yeast, both binding stability and genomic preferences depended on largely disordered non-DBD regions. These findings suggest intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) may therefore direct genome binding TF target recognition across evolutionarily distant genomes.
2026-06-17 | GSE325768 | GEO