Chromatin architectural proteins regulate flowering time by precluding gene looping
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA687751 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR13316009_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR13316009_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR13316010_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR13316010_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR13316011_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 14 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:We identified genes that could be regulated by HON4 and HON5 by using RNA-seq and ChIP-seq.
2021-06-16 | GSE163850 | GEO
Project description:Transcriptional enhancers are brought into proximity with promoters via chromatin looping. The architectural transcription cofactor LDB1 facilitates spatial connectivity among enhancers and promoters, but whether this occurs through simple dimerization or requires heterotypic protein assemblies is unknown. Here we investigated single-stranded DNA binding proteins (SSBPs) in regulating LDB1-mediated chromatin looping and transcription. SSBP2, SSBP3, and SSBP4 colocalize with LDB1 genome-wide. Among these, only SSBP3 is essential for murine erythroid cell viability, LDB1 function, and transcription. LDB1 but not single-stranded DNA is the predominant genome-wide tether of SSBP3 to chromatin. SSBP3 depletion in SSBP2/4 knockout cells globally weakened LDB1-dependent chromatin loops and lowered nascent transcription without impacting LDB1's chromatin binding. Chromatin tethering experiments revealed SSBP3 and LDB1 mutually depend on each other to form looped contacts. SSBP3 stabilizes LDB1 dimerization in vitro, providing a possible mechanism. SSBPs emerge as key functional components of the architectural LDB1 complex.
2025-07-23 | GSE288265 | GEO
Project description:Transcriptional enhancers are brought into proximity with promoters via chromatin looping. The architectural transcription cofactor LDB1 facilitates spatial connectivity among enhancers and promoters, but whether this occurs through simple dimerization or requires heterotypic protein assemblies is unknown. Here we investigated single-stranded DNA binding proteins (SSBPs) in regulating LDB1-mediated chromatin looping and transcription. SSBP2, SSBP3, and SSBP4 colocalize with LDB1 genome-wide. Among these, only SSBP3 is essential for murine erythroid cell viability, LDB1 function, and transcription. LDB1 but not single-stranded DNA is the predominant genome-wide tether of SSBP3 to chromatin. SSBP3 depletion in SSBP2/4 knockout cells globally weakened LDB1-dependent chromatin loops and lowered nascent transcription without impacting LDB1's chromatin binding. Chromatin tethering experiments revealed SSBP3 and LDB1 mutually depend on each other to form looped contacts. SSBP3 stabilizes LDB1 dimerization in vitro, providing a possible mechanism. SSBPs emerge as key functional components of the architectural LDB1 complex.
2025-07-23 | GSE288089 | GEO
Project description:Transcriptional enhancers are brought into proximity with promoters via chromatin looping. The architectural transcription cofactor LDB1 facilitates spatial connectivity among enhancers and promoters, but whether this occurs through simple dimerization or requires heterotypic protein assemblies is unknown. Here we investigated single-stranded DNA binding proteins (SSBPs) in regulating LDB1-mediated chromatin looping and transcription. SSBP2, SSBP3, and SSBP4 colocalize with LDB1 genome-wide. Among these, only SSBP3 is essential for murine erythroid cell viability, LDB1 function, and transcription. LDB1 but not single-stranded DNA is the predominant genome-wide tether of SSBP3 to chromatin. SSBP3 depletion in SSBP2/4 knockout cells globally weakened LDB1-dependent chromatin loops and lowered nascent transcription without impacting LDB1's chromatin binding. Chromatin tethering experiments revealed SSBP3 and LDB1 mutually depend on each other to form looped contacts. SSBP3 stabilizes LDB1 dimerization in vitro, providing a possible mechanism. SSBPs emerge as key functional components of the architectural LDB1 complex.
2025-07-23 | GSE288079 | GEO
Project description:Transcriptional enhancers are brought into proximity with promoters via chromatin looping. The architectural transcription cofactor LDB1 facilitates spatial connectivity among enhancers and promoters, but whether this occurs through simple dimerization or requires heterotypic protein assemblies is unknown. Here we investigated single-stranded DNA binding proteins (SSBPs) in regulating LDB1-mediated chromatin looping and transcription. SSBP2, SSBP3, and SSBP4 colocalize with LDB1 genome-wide. Among these, only SSBP3 is essential for murine erythroid cell viability, LDB1 function, and transcription. LDB1 but not single-stranded DNA is the predominant genome-wide tether of SSBP3 to chromatin. SSBP3 depletion in SSBP2/4 knockout cells globally weakened LDB1-dependent chromatin loops and lowered nascent transcription without impacting LDB1's chromatin binding. Chromatin tethering experiments revealed SSBP3 and LDB1 mutually depend on each other to form looped contacts. SSBP3 stabilizes LDB1 dimerization in vitro, providing a possible mechanism. SSBPs emerge as key functional components of the architectural LDB1 complex.
2025-07-23 | GSE288078 | GEO
Project description:Transcriptional enhancers are brought into proximity with promoters via chromatin looping. The architectural transcription cofactor LDB1 facilitates spatial connectivity among enhancers and promoters, but whether this occurs through simple dimerization or requires heterotypic protein assemblies is unknown. Here we investigated single-stranded DNA binding proteins (SSBPs) in regulating LDB1-mediated chromatin looping and transcription. SSBP2, SSBP3, and SSBP4 colocalize with LDB1 genome-wide. Among these, only SSBP3 is essential for murine erythroid cell viability, LDB1 function, and transcription. LDB1 but not single-stranded DNA is the predominant genome-wide tether of SSBP3 to chromatin. SSBP3 depletion in SSBP2/4 knockout cells globally weakened LDB1-dependent chromatin loops and lowered nascent transcription without impacting LDB1's chromatin binding. Chromatin tethering experiments revealed SSBP3 and LDB1 mutually depend on each other to form looped contacts. SSBP3 stabilizes LDB1 dimerization in vitro, providing a possible mechanism. SSBPs emerge as key functional components of the architectural LDB1 complex.
2025-07-23 | GSE288004 | GEO
Project description:Architectural proteins alter the shape of DNA. Some distort the double helix by introducing sharp kinks. This can serve to relieve strain in tightly-bent DNA structures. Here, we design and test artificial architectural proteins based on a sequence-specific Transcription Activator-like Effector (TALE) protein, either alone or fused to a eukaryotic high mobility group B (HMGB) DNA-bending domain. We hypothesized that TALE protein binding would stiffen DNA to bending and twisting, acting as an architectural protein that antagonizes the formation of small DNA loops. In contrast, fusion to an HMGB domain was hypothesized to generate a targeted DNA-bending architectural protein that facilitates DNA looping. We provide evidence from Escherichia coli Lac repressor gene regulatory loops supporting these hypotheses in living bacteria. Both data fitting to a thermodynamic DNA looping model and sophisticated molecular modeling support the interpretation of these results. We find that TALE protein binding inhibits looping by stiffening DNA to bending and twisting, while the Nhp6A domain enhances looping by bending DNA without introducing twisting flexibility. Our work illustrates artificial approaches to sculpt DNA geometry with functional consequences. Similar approaches may be applicable to tune the stability of small DNA loops in eukaryotes.
| S-EPMC8501960 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The timing of flowering is a critical agronomic trait governed by a number of different internal and external events, such as temperature, light and photoperiod. Despite a firm understanding of flowering time from a genetic standpoint, there exists a limited understanding of how post-translational modifications may influence flowering, and what molecular PTM machinery is responsible for catalyzing these events. Here, we identify and characterize a novel B4 Raf-like MAPKKK protein kinase called RAF24, which exhibits an early flowering phenotype. Analysis of closely-related B4 Raf-like MAPKKK protein kinases RAF18 and RAF20, indicate that RAF24 is the only B4 RAF to possess an early flowering phenotype. Through quantitative proteomics, we then found that RAF24 impacts the phosphorylation status of numerous flowering related proteins related to the autonomous flowering pathway, with changes in the phosphorylation status of HISTONE MONO-UBIQUITINATION 2 (HUB2) representing the largest fold-change. Subsequent analysis of the HUB2 protein interactome by quantitative affinity purification mass spectrometry (AP-MS) revealed a relationship between HUB2 phosphorylation at S314 phosphorylation status and HUB2 function that manifest as changes in activity and protein-protein interactions. Use of phospho-memetic and -ablative mutants validate the importance of S314, directly linking this HUB2 phosphorylation event to the proper control of flowering time. Collectively, our findings implicate RAF24 as a higher-order regulator of flowering, while further implicating HUB2 as a centerpiece of flowering time regulation in plants.
2025-05-09 | PXD038688 | Pride
Project description:This study investigated the effect of autophagy on flowering time in rice. Results provide important information of the response of flowering time to autophagy, such as specific flowerig time genes, up- or down-regulated specific flowering time functions.
2022-05-06 | GSE175519 | GEO
Project description:In this study, we further characterized the hkCP and dCP enhancers, which were identified by STARR-seq, and shown to have an intrinsic capacity to interact with a specific type of core promoter depending on the presence of a DRE motif [9]. hkCP enhancers are marked by H3K4me3, associated with TAD borders, and mediate large TSS-clustered interactions to promote robust transcription. Furthermore, they contain the architectural proteins CAP-H2, Chromator, DREF and Z4. In contrast, dCP enhancers are marked by H3K4me1, associated with chromatin loop anchors and are more commonly associated with single TSS-contacts. dCP enhancers are depleted of the hkCP-specific architectural proteins and show an enrichment for Fs(1)h-L and Rad21 instead. Thus, our data supports the model that the unique occupancy of architectural proteins in the distinct enhancer classes are key contributors to the types of interactions that enhancers can mediate genome-wide, ultimately affecting enhancer-promoter specificity.
2016-11-16 | GSE80700 | GEO