Negative supcoils pattern meiotic crossovers
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA831113 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR18901200_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR18901200_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR18901201_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR18901201_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR18901202_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 72 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Interference exists ubiquitously in many biological processes. Crossover interference patterns meiotic crossovers, which are required for faithful chromosome segregation and evolutionary adaption. However, what the interference signal is and how it is generated and regulated are unknown. We show that yeast top2 alleles cannot bind or cleave DNA accumulate a higher level of negative supercoils and show weaker interference. However, top2 alleles cannot religate the cleaved DNA or release the religated DNA accumulate less negative supercoils and show stronger interference. Moreover, the level of negative supercoils is negatively correlated with crossover interference strength in various strains. Furthermore, negative supercoils preferentially enrich at crossover-associated Zip3 regions before the formation of meiotic DNA double-strand breaks, and regions with more negative supercoils tend to have more Zip3. Additionally, the strength of crossover interference and homeostasis change coordinately in mutants. These findings suggest that the accumulation and relief of negative supercoils pattern meiotic crossovers.
2022-08-24 | GSE201366 | GEO
Project description:Crossover recombination is a hallmark of meiosis, which holds the paternal and maternal chromosomes (homologs) together for their faithful separation, meanwhile, it promotes genetic diversity of progenies. The pattern of crossover is mainly controlled by the architecture of meiotic chromosomes. Environmental factors, especially temperature, also play an important role in modulating crossovers. However, it is unclear how temperature affects crossovers. Here, we examined the distributions of budding yeast axis components (Red1, Hop1, and Rec8) and the CO-associated Zip3 foci in detail in different temperatures, and found that both increased and decreased temperatures result in shorter meiotic chromosome axes and more crossovers. Further investigations showed that altered temperature coordinately enhanced the hyperabundant accumulation of Hop1 and Red1 on chromosomes and the number of Zip3 foci. Most importantly, temperature-induced alterations in axis distribution and Zip3 foci depend on the changes in DNA negative supercoil. These findings suggest that yeast meiosis senses temperature changes by increasing the level of negative supercoil to increase crossovers and modulate chromosome organization. These findings provide a novel view in understanding the effect and mechanism of temperature on meiosis recombination and chromosome organization, and thus also have an important implication in evolution and breeding.
2024-07-30 | GSE246901 | GEO
Project description:Negative supercoil senses temperature to modulate meiotic crossovers and chromosomes
| PRJNA1035078 | ENA
Project description:Whole-genome DNA libraries were prepared from a population of just under 100 Col/Ler F1 backcrossed to Col. Low-coverage whole-genome sequencing was used to map meiotic crossovers in this population following the protocol described in Rowan et al., 2015, doi: 10.1534/g3.114.016501.
2015-10-15 | E-MTAB-3926 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:To map meiotic crossovers and noncrossovers across the yeast genome, we genotyped the four spores of 51 tetrads arising from sporulation of a YJM789/S96 hybrid strain. Sporulation was induced, tetrads were dissected, and genomic DNA from each spore was hybridized to microarrays, one array per spore. 12 YJM789 and 13 S96 hybridizations were also performed as a reference for genotyping. To analyze recombination mutants, we also hybridized DNA from 5 tetrads arising from a YJM789/S96 hybrid strain homozygous for a MSH4 deletion, and from 20 spores (6 dyads and 8 single spores) arising from a hybrid homozygous for a MMS4 deletion.
2009-08-04 | E-TABM-470 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Mapping meiotic crossovers in Arabidopsis using low-coverage whole-genome sequencing
| PRJEB11267 | ENA
Project description:In most eukaryotes, meiotic crossovers are essential for error-free chromosome segregation but are specifically repressed near centromeres to prevent missegregation. Recognized for >85 years, the molecular mechanism of this repression has remained unknown. Meiotic chromosomes contain two distinct cohesin complexes: pericentric complex (for segregation) and chromosomal arm complex (for crossing-over). We show that the pericentric-specific complex also actively represses pericentric meiotic double-strand break (DSB) formation and, consequently, crossovers. The fission yeast pericentric regions contain heterochromatin, removal of which can result in derepression in double-strand break formation and recombination during meiosis. We uncover the mechanism by which fission yeast heterochromatin protein Swi6 (mammalian HP1-homolog) prevents recruitment of activators of meiotic DSB formation such as Rec10. Localizing these missing activators to wild-type pericentromeres bypasses repression and generates abundant crossovers but reduces gamete viability.The molecular mechanism elucidated here likely extends to other species including humans, where pericentric crossovers can result in disorders such as Down syndrome. These mechanistic insights provide new clues to understand the roles played by multiple cohesin complexes, especially in human infertility and birth defects.
2018-06-14 | GSE115726 | GEO
Project description:Proteins of the XPF-ERCC1 complex family play roles in DNA repair. Known members (four in mammals, two in budding yeast) recognize branched DNA structures and most bear nuclease activity. Here, we identified a new XPF-ERCC1-like complex important for meiotic crossovers production. Through a proteomic screen, we found that Zip2 and Spo16, two proteins important for CO formation in budding yeast, form a complex and share structural similarities with XPF-ERCC1. Zip2 XPF domain is important for CO formation and, in complex with Spo16, preferentially binds branched DNA molecules. However, Zip2-Spo16 lacks endonucleolytic activity. This suggests that Zip2-Spo16 works as a structural module that recognizes and stabilizes joint molecules to ensure CO formation. Moreover, Zip2-Spo16 forms a complex (called ZZS) with Zip4, another protein important for CO formation, which directly interacts with components of the chromosome axis, providing a link between recombination intermediates and the underlying chromosome structure.
2018-04-10 | PXD007735 | Pride
Project description:Viable gamete formation requires segregation of homologous chromosomes connected, in most species, by crossovers. DNA double-strand break (DSB) formation and the resulting crossovers are regulated at multiple levels to prevent overabundance along chromosomes. Meiotic cells coordinate these events between distant sites, but the physical basis of long-distance chromosomal communication has been unknown. We show that DSB hotspots up to ~200 kb (~35 cM) apart form clusters via hotspot-binding proteins Rec25 and Rec27 in fission yeast. Clustering coincides with hotspot competition and interference over similar distances. Without Tel1 (ATM tumor-suppressor homolog), DSB and crossover interference become negative, reflecting coordinated action along a chromosome. These results indicate that DSB hotspots within a limited chromosomal region and bound by their protein determinants form a clustered structure that, via Tel1, allows only one DSB per region. Such a “roulette” process among clusters explains the observed pattern of crossover interference in fission yeast. Key structural and regulatory components of clusters are phylogenetically conserved, suggesting conservation of this vital regulation. Based on these observations, we discuss variations on a model in which clustering and competition between DSB sites leads to DSB interference and in turn produces crossover interference.
2018-09-17 | GSE119745 | GEO
Project description:Viable gamete formation requires segregation of homologous chromosomes connected, in most species, by crossovers. DNA double-strand break (DSB) formation and the resulting crossovers are regulated at multiple levels to prevent overabundance along chromosomes. Meiotic cells coordinate these events between distant sites, but the physical basis of long-distance chromosomal communication has been unknown. We show that DSB hotspots up to ~200 kb (~35 cM) apart form clusters via hotspot-binding proteins Rec25 and Rec27 in fission yeast. Clustering coincides with hotspot competition and interference over similar distances. Without Tel1 (ATM tumor-suppressor homolog), DSB and crossover interference become negative, reflecting coordinated action along a chromosome. These results indicate that DSB hotspots within a limited chromosomal region and bound by their protein determinants form a clustered structure that, via Tel1, allows only one DSB per region. Such a “roulette” process among clusters explains the observed pattern of crossover interference in fission yeast. Key structural and regulatory components of clusters are phylogenetically conserved, suggesting conservation of this vital regulation. Based on these observations, we discuss variations on a model in which clustering and competition between DSB sites leads to DSB interference and in turn produces crossover interference.
2018-09-17 | GSE119920 | GEO