Complementies strategies encoded by DBD and IDRs direct TF binding
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA861864 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR20591300_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR20591300_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR20591400_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR20591400_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR20591500_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 1260 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Profiling TF sequence variants to map their specificity determinants
2023-05-03 | GSE209631 | GEO
Project description:Eukaryotic transcription factors (TFs) contain both structured DNA-binding domains (DBDs) and intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). While the structures and sequence preferences of DBDs have been extensively characterized, the role of IDR-mediated interactions in chromatin binding and nuclear organization remains poorly understood, in part because these interactions have been difficult to measure in living cells. Here, we use a recently developed single-molecule technique, proximity-assisted photoactivation (PAPA), to investigate how IDRs influence TF associations with each other and with chromatin, focusing on the factors Sp1 and Klf1. We find that the number and patterning of aromatic and basic residues within IDRs govern both TF self-association and chromatin binding. Unexpectedly, the isolated DBD of Sp1 binds chromatin very weakly and non-specifically. The isolated IDR, by contrast, interacts poorly with chromatin-bound wild-type Sp1, yet this interaction is enhanced when even minimal DNA-binding capacity is restored. Strikingly, replacing Sp1's native DBD with those of heterologous TFs recovers both IDR-mediated interactions and chromatin association, despite divergent sequence preferences. PAPA measurements also reveal extensive heterotypic interactions between wild-type Sp1 and other TFs. Together, these results establish PAPA as a powerful method for studying unstructured interactions in their native context and suggest that IDRs participate in widespread cooperative associations scaffolded by transient DBD-DNA contacts, which concentrate disordered regions along chromatin. In contrast to classical models, we propose that TF specificity in vivo emerges not solely from DBD sequence preferences, but from a constellation of weak, dynamic, and diverse interactions mediated by IDRs.
2026-03-20 | GSE300853 | GEO
Project description:Eukaryotic transcription factors (TFs) contain both structured DNA-binding domains (DBDs) and intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). While the structures and sequence preferences of DBDs have been extensively characterized, the role of IDR-mediated interactions in chromatin binding and nuclear organization remains poorly understood, in part because these interactions have been difficult to measure in living cells. Here, we use a recently developed single-molecule technique, proximity-assisted photoactivation (PAPA), to investigate how IDRs influence TF associations with each other and with chromatin, focusing on the factors Sp1 and Klf1. We find that the number and patterning of aromatic and basic residues within IDRs govern both TF self-association and chromatin binding. Unexpectedly, the isolated DBD of Sp1 binds chromatin very weakly and non-specifically. The isolated IDR, by contrast, interacts poorly with chromatin-bound wild-type Sp1, yet this interaction is enhanced when even minimal DNA-binding capacity is restored. Strikingly, replacing Sp1's native DBD with those of heterologous TFs recovers both IDR-mediated interactions and chromatin association, despite divergent sequence preferences. PAPA measurements also reveal extensive heterotypic interactions between wild-type Sp1 and other TFs. Together, these results establish PAPA as a powerful method for studying unstructured interactions in their native context and suggest that IDRs participate in widespread cooperative associations scaffolded by transient DBD-DNA contacts, which concentrate disordered regions along chromatin. In contrast to classical models, we propose that TF specificity in vivo emerges not solely from DBD sequence preferences, but from a constellation of weak, dynamic, and diverse interactions mediated by IDRs.
2026-03-20 | GSE300854 | GEO
Project description:Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) have emerged as crucial regulators of protein function, allowing proteins to sense and respond to their environment. Creb binding protein (CBP) and EP300 (p300) are transcription coactivators that regulate gene expression in multicellular organisms, following their recruitment to cis-regulatory elements. CBP and p300 contain large IDRs, however little is known about how these different IDRs work together to regulate CBP function. Here, we show that CBP-IDRs cooperate to control different aspects of CBP behaviour in the nucleus, by regulating the properties of fluid-like condensates formed by endogenous CBP. We show how IDRs with different sequence properties make unique contributions to CBP behaviour by establishing a balance between positive and negative regulation of CBP condensates. These conflicting interactions are functionally important, shaping CBPs response to factors such as lysine acetylation, that influence condensate formation. When disrupted, regulatory CBP-IDRs change how CBP interacts with chromatin, alter patterns of CBP-dependent histone acetylation and change gene expression. Together, our work highlights how IDRs with different sequences, spatially segregated in the same protein, can cooperate to shape protein function.
2026-02-23 | GSE268266 | GEO
Project description:Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) have emerged as crucial regulators of protein function, allowing proteins to sense and respond to their environment. Creb binding protein (CBP) and EP300 (p300) are transcription coactivators that regulate gene expression in multicellular organisms, following their recruitment to cis-regulatory elements. CBP and p300 contain large IDRs, however little is known about how these different IDRs work together to regulate CBP function. Here, we show that CBP-IDRs cooperate to control different aspects of CBP behaviour in the nucleus, by regulating the properties of fluid-like condensates formed by endogenous CBP. We show how IDRs with different sequence properties make unique contributions to CBP behaviour by establishing a balance between positive and negative regulation of CBP condensates. These conflicting interactions are functionally important, shaping CBPs response to factors such as lysine acetylation, that influence condensate formation. When disrupted, regulatory CBP-IDRs change how CBP interacts with chromatin, alter patterns of CBP-dependent histone acetylation and change gene expression. Together, our work highlights how IDRs with different sequences, spatially segregated in the same protein, can cooperate to shape protein function.
2026-02-23 | GSE299614 | GEO
Project description:Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) have emerged as crucial regulators of protein function, allowing proteins to sense and respond to their environment. Creb binding protein (CBP) and EP300 (p300) are transcription coactivators that regulate gene expression in multicellular organisms, following their recruitment to cis-regulatory elements. CBP and p300 contain large IDRs, however little is known about how these different IDRs work together to regulate CBP function. Here, we show that CBP-IDRs cooperate to control different aspects of CBP behaviour in the nucleus, by regulating the properties of fluid-like condensates formed by endogenous CBP. We show how IDRs with different sequence properties make unique contributions to CBP behaviour by establishing a balance between positive and negative regulation of CBP condensates. These conflicting interactions are functionally important, shaping CBPs response to factors such as lysine acetylation, that influence condensate formation. When disrupted, regulatory CBP-IDRs change how CBP interacts with chromatin, alter patterns of CBP-dependent histone acetylation and change gene expression. Together, our work highlights how IDRs with different sequences, spatially segregated in the same protein, can cooperate to shape protein function.
2026-02-23 | GSE299613 | GEO
Project description:Chromatin accessibility to investigate the TF-chromatin information patterns encoded in the accessible genome
| PRJNA557298 | ENA
Project description:Desulfuromonas sp. TF strain:TF Genome sequencing and assembly
| PRJNA175252 | ENA
Project description:CBP-IDRs regulate acetylation and gene expression
| PRJNA1275676 | ENA
Project description:Purpose: The goal of this study is to use chromatin accessibility data to study the information patterns of chromatin accessibility that encode TF-chromatin interactions. Methods: We generated chromatin accessibility data from the GM12878 lymphoblastoid cell line using a modified protocol where the ATAC-seq fragments are sonicated during the library preparation. The goal of the sonication step is to disrupt the observed fragment size distribution, therefore masking local TF-chromatin interactions encoded in the larger fragment sizes (e.g. nucleosome phasing) without affecting the levels of chromatin accessibility.
2020-12-21 | GSE135074 | GEO