Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA884263 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR21708000_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR21708000_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR21708100_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR21708100_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR21708200_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 942 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) archival tissue is an important source of DNA material. The most commonly used technique to identify copy number aberrations from chromosomal DNA in tumorigenesis is array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Although copy number analysis using DNA from FFPE archival tissue is challenging, several research groups have reported high quality and reproducible DNA copy number results using aCGH. Aim of the present study is to compare aCGH platforms suitable for copy number analysis using FFPE derived DNA. Two dual channel aCGH platforms (Agilent and NimbleGen) and a single channel SNP based platform (Affymetrix), were evaluated using seven FFPE colon cancer samples, median absolute deviation (MAD), deflection, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and DNA input requirements were used as quality criteria. Large differences were observed in MAD values and deflection between platforms; Agilent and NimbleGen showed better MAD values (0.13 for both) compared to Affymetrix (0.22). Contrary, Affymetrix showed a better deflection of 0.94, followed by 0.71 for Agilent and 0.51 for NimbleGen. Since the deflection compensates for the MAD the Signal to Noise Ratios (SNR) were comparable; Agilent ranks first, Affymetrix second and NimbleGen third with SNRs of 3.9, 3.6 and 3.3 respectively. DNA input amounts of 40ng are sufficient for high quality profiles with Affymetrix. For Agilent DNA input amounts of 50ng are sufficient for high quality profiles. For results of similar quality NimbleGen requires at least 100ng. Copy number analysis using DNA derived from FFPE archival material is feasible and shows reproducible results on high-resolution copy number platforms. Input amounts of DNA from FFPE material lower than recommended still yield high quality profiles without additional amplification steps.
2012-01-17 | GSE30120 | GEO
Project description:Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) archival tissue is an important source of DNA material. The most commonly used technique to identify copy number aberrations from chromosomal DNA in tumorigenesis is array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Although copy number analysis using DNA from FFPE archival tissue is challenging, several research groups have reported high quality and reproducible DNA copy number results using aCGH. Aim of the present study is to compare aCGH platforms suitable for copy number analysis using FFPE derived DNA. Two dual channel aCGH platforms (Agilent and NimbleGen) and a single channel SNP based platform (Affymetrix), were evaluated using seven FFPE colon cancer samples, median absolute deviation (MAD), deflection, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and DNA input requirements were used as quality criteria. Large differences were observed in MAD values and deflection between platforms; Agilent and NimbleGen showed better MAD values (0.13 for both) compared to Affymetrix (0.22). Contrary, Affymetrix showed a better deflection of 0.94, followed by 0.71 for Agilent and 0.51 for NimbleGen. Since the deflection compensates for the MAD the Signal to Noise Ratios (SNR) were comparable; Agilent ranks first, Affymetrix second and NimbleGen third with SNRs of 3.9, 3.6 and 3.3 respectively. DNA input amounts of 40ng are sufficient for high quality profiles with Affymetrix. For Agilent DNA input amounts of 50ng are sufficient for high quality profiles. For results of similar quality NimbleGen requires at least 100ng. Copy number analysis using DNA derived from FFPE archival material is feasible and shows reproducible results on high-resolution copy number platforms. Input amounts of DNA from FFPE material lower than recommended still yield high quality profiles without additional amplification steps.
2012-01-17 | GSE30121 | GEO
Project description:Chromatin-protein interactions are fundamental for the regulation of gene transcription. While ChIP-seq has long been the standard method for mapping these interactions, emerging techniques such as CUT&RUN and CUT&Tag, which offer advantages including low input requirements and high signal-to-noise ratios, have garnered attention. However, these enzyme-based tagmentation approaches may introduce potential biases, and comparative assessment with ChIP-seq remain absent. This study aims to systematically evaluate and compare the performance of ChIP-seq, CUT&Tag, and CUT&RUN for profiling genome-wide transcription factors and histone modifications binding. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of ChIP-seq, CUT&Tag, and CUT&RUN for detecting active and repressive histone modifications as well as transcription factor binding. Our results show that all three methods reliably detect histone modifications and transcription factor enrichment, with CUT&Tag demonstrating a relatively higher signal-to-noise ratio. Rigorous peak comparison analysis identified differential enrichment sites detected by the three methods. Additionally, we observed a notable correlation between CUT&Tag signal intensity and chromatin accessibility, suggesting the potential for CUT&Tag to detect regions of active chromatin.
2025-05-13 | GSE286751 | GEO
Project description:Genome-wide assessment of protein-DNA interactions binding by ChIP-seq is a key technology to study transcription factor (TF) localization and regulation of gene-expression. In ChIP-seq, signal-to-noise-ratio as well as signal specificity depend on many variables including antibody quality, and efforts to improve ChIP-seq data thus far focused mostly on generating better reagents. Here we introduce KOIN (KO implemented normalization) as a novel strategy to increase signal specificity and reduce noise by using TF knockout-mice as a critical control for ChIP-seq. We tested our new peak calling strategy (KO implemented normalization = KOIN) on different ChIP-seq datasets to increase signal specificity and reduce noise.
2014-07-17 | E-GEOD-55317 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Genome-wide assessment of protein-DNA interactions binding by ChIP-seq is a key technology to study transcription factor (TF) localization and regulation of gene-expression. In ChIP-seq, signal-to-noise-ratio as well as signal specificity depend on many variables including antibody quality, and efforts to improve ChIP-seq data thus far focused mostly on generating better reagents. Here we introduce KOIN (KO implemented normalization) as a novel strategy to increase signal specificity and reduce noise by using TF knockout-mice as a critical control for ChIP-seq.
2014-07-17 | GSE55317 | GEO
Project description:Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) archival tissue is an important source of DNA material. The most commonly used technique to identify copy number aberrations from chromosomal DNA in tumorigenesis is array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Although copy number analysis using DNA from FFPE archival tissue is challenging, several research groups have reported high quality and reproducible DNA copy number results using aCGH. Aim of the present study is to compare aCGH platforms suitable for copy number analysis using FFPE derived DNA. Two dual channel aCGH platforms (Agilent and NimbleGen) and a single channel SNP based platform (Affymetrix), were evaluated using seven FFPE colon cancer samples, median absolute deviation (MAD), deflection, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and DNA input requirements were used as quality criteria. Large differences were observed in MAD values and deflection between platforms; Agilent and NimbleGen showed better MAD values (0.13 for both) compared to Affymetrix (0.22). Contrary, Affymetrix showed a better deflection of 0.94, followed by 0.71 for Agilent and 0.51 for NimbleGen. Since the deflection compensates for the MAD the Signal to Noise Ratios (SNR) were comparable; Agilent ranks first, Affymetrix second and NimbleGen third with SNRs of 3.9, 3.6 and 3.3 respectively. DNA input amounts of 40ng are sufficient for high quality profiles with Affymetrix. For Agilent DNA input amounts of 50ng are sufficient for high quality profiles. For results of similar quality NimbleGen requires at least 100ng. Copy number analysis using DNA derived from FFPE archival material is feasible and shows reproducible results on high-resolution copy number platforms. Input amounts of DNA from FFPE material lower than recommended still yield high quality profiles without additional amplification steps. Overall study comprises 6 samples analyzed across three platforms with an additional dilution range (5 concentrations) of a seventh sample on two platforms. This Series represents NimbleGen platform-derived data.
2012-01-17 | E-GEOD-30120 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) archival tissue is an important source of DNA material. The most commonly used technique to identify copy number aberrations from chromosomal DNA in tumorigenesis is array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Although copy number analysis using DNA from FFPE archival tissue is challenging, several research groups have reported high quality and reproducible DNA copy number results using aCGH. Aim of the present study is to compare aCGH platforms suitable for copy number analysis using FFPE derived DNA. Two dual channel aCGH platforms (Agilent and NimbleGen) and a single channel SNP based platform (Affymetrix), were evaluated using seven FFPE colon cancer samples, median absolute deviation (MAD), deflection, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and DNA input requirements were used as quality criteria. Large differences were observed in MAD values and deflection between platforms; Agilent and NimbleGen showed better MAD values (0.13 for both) compared to Affymetrix (0.22). Contrary, Affymetrix showed a better deflection of 0.94, followed by 0.71 for Agilent and 0.51 for NimbleGen. Since the deflection compensates for the MAD the Signal to Noise Ratios (SNR) were comparable; Agilent ranks first, Affymetrix second and NimbleGen third with SNRs of 3.9, 3.6 and 3.3 respectively. DNA input amounts of 40ng are sufficient for high quality profiles with Affymetrix. For Agilent DNA input amounts of 50ng are sufficient for high quality profiles. For results of similar quality NimbleGen requires at least 100ng. Copy number analysis using DNA derived from FFPE archival material is feasible and shows reproducible results on high-resolution copy number platforms. Input amounts of DNA from FFPE material lower than recommended still yield high quality profiles without additional amplification steps. Overall study comprises 6 samples analyzed across three platforms with an additional dilution range (5 concentrations) of a seventh sample on two platforms. This Series represents Agilent platform-derived data.
2012-01-17 | E-GEOD-30121 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Eukaryotic cells regulate higher-order chromatin architecture, gene expression, and gene recombination via compaction of the genome into chromatin loops and topologically associating domains (TADs). While chromatin architecture has been thoroughly characterized for many eukaryotic genomes using cell-destructive techniques such as 3C-based methods, live-cell biosensing tools that can probe three-dimensional chromatin contacts in real-time are lacking. Using a dual dCas9 DNA biosensor based on a split NanoLuc luciferase reporter, we directly detected chromatin loops in live cells using luminescence quantification in a luminometer. We were able to see signal above background ratios of up to 10-fold. In addition, we directly visualized chromatin looping at the MYC TAD in live cells using high-resolution, low light live-cell imaging. Our biosensing platform therefore provides a useful methodology for live-cell, real-time detection of known or novel loops and for monitoring looping dynamics upon alterations in cell state.
2025-11-13 | GSE295357 | GEO