Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA978584 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR24796009_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR24796010_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR24796011_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR24796012_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR24796013_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 7 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Illumina 1M Omni Quad arrays were used to test mutation calling accuracy of qSNP tool (a mutation caller) Ilumina array genotypes with GenCal (GC score)>0.70 were used in the comparison of genotype calls using next generation sequencing data and qSNP (mutation caller) 2 samples (control cell line and Melanoma cell line). This is the data for a validation step. contributor: Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative
2014-06-13 | E-GEOD-47904 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Next generation sequencing platforms have become essential tools for understanding DNA in a wide range of contexts. Their success heavily relies on the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of methods used to discern differences between the reference genome and genomes under investigation. Here we compare the relative performances of five popular single nucleotide variant callers with and without their associated recommended hard filtering criteria. We compare: FreeBayes; the Genome Analysis Toolkit’s Haplotype Caller and Unified Genotyper; SAMtools; and VarScan. We tailor this comparison to suit smaller projects with modest sample numbers (n = 10) and coverage (~10X) to fill a current gap in the literature. Other comparison studies are generally applicable only to larger projects in model species, where there is access to large amounts of sequencing data and curated callsets for base and variant quality score recalibration. We estimated the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of each pipeline according to the genotype concordance rate and number with the “truth” dataset for 10 canine samples. The truth dataset was defined as genotypes obtained from the CanineHD BeadChip array. Whole genome sequencing data was performed on the Illumina HiSeq2000 or HiSeq2500 platform as 100-101 base pair, paired end reads to an average sample coverage of 10.3X. Apart from GATK Haplotype Caller, applying recommended hard filters did not improve the performance of genotyping concordance at the tested levels of minimum coverage. The default VarScan pipeline with no additional filters applied (VarScan uses SAMtools mpileup, without base alignment quality computation) generally outperformed other callers in terms of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. The results of this study demonstrate that hard filtering of variant calls from low-powered genome studies can impair accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of callsets and provides some benchmark performance metrics on a range of low coverage levels.
2018-08-31 | GSE117010 | GEO
Project description:Illumina 1M Omni Quad arrays were used to test mutation calling accuracy of qSNP tool (a mutation caller) Ilumina array genotypes with GenCal (GC score)>0.70 were used in the comparison of genotype calls using next generation sequencing data and qSNP (mutation caller)
2014-06-13 | GSE47904 | GEO
Project description:ChIP-Seq is a technique used to analyse protein-DNA interactions. The protein-DNA complex is pulled down using a protein antibody, after which sequencing and analysis of the bound DNA fragments is performed. A key bioinformatics analysis step is “peak” calling - identifying regions of enrichment. Benchmarking studies have consistently shown that no optimal peak caller exists. Peak callers have distinct selectivity and specificity characteristics which are often not additive and seldom completely overlap in many scenarios. In the absence of a universal peak caller, we rationalized one ought to utilize multiple peak-callers to 1) gauge peak confidence as determined through detection by multiple algorithms, and 2) more thoroughly survey the protein-bound landscape by capturing peaks not detected by individual peak callers owing to algorithmic limitations and biases. We therefore developed an integrated ChIP-Seq Analysis Pipeline (ChIP AP) which performs all analysis steps from raw fastq files to final result, and utilizes four commonly used peak callers to more thoroughly and comprehensively analyse datasets. Results are integrated and presented in a single file enabling users to apply selectivity and sensitivity thresholds to select the consensus peak set, the union peak set, or any sub-set in-between to more confidently and comprehensively explore the protein bound landscape. (https://github.com/JSuryatenggara/ChIP-AP).
2022-01-03 | GSE172355 | GEO
Project description:Exome sequences were aligned to the GRCH38 reference genome. Aligned sequence was analyzed with GATK Haplotype Caller to generate germline variant calls. Variant calls are in VCF format. Details for the call can be found in the VCF header
| EGAD00001005916 | EGA
Project description:Human meningioma fixed tumour tissue: validation set
| PRJNA122829 | ENA
Project description:HLA-DR15 is a haplotype associated with multiple sclerosis. It contains the two DRB* genes DRB1*1501 (DR2b) and DRB5*0101 (DR2a). The reported anchor motif of the corresponding HLA-DR molecules was determined years ago based on a small number of peptide ligands and binding assays. DR2a could display a set of peptides complementary to that presented by DR2b or, alternatively, a similar peptide repertoire but recognized in a different manner by T cells. It is known that DR2a and DR2b share some peptide ligands, although the degree of similarity of their associated peptidomes remains unclear. In addition, the contribution of each molecule to the global peptide repertoire presented by the HLA-DR15 haplotype has not been evaluated. We used mass spectrometry to analyze the peptide pools bound to DR2a and DR2b, identifying 169 and 555 unique peptide ligands of DR2a and DR2b, respectively. The analysis of these sets of peptides allowed the refinement of the corresponding binding motifs revealing novel anchor residues that had been overlooked in previous analyses. Moreover, the number of shared ligands between both molecules was low, indicating that DR2a and DR2b present complementary peptide repertoires to T cells. Finally, our analysis suggests that, quantitatively, both molecules contribute to the peptide repertoire presented by cells expressing the HLA-DR15 haplotype.
2017-10-10 | PXD006534 | Pride