Metabolomics,Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

Gene expression profiles of mono- and biallelic CEBPA mutations in cytogenetically normal AML

ABSTRACT: Purpose: CEBPA mutations are found as either biallelic (biCEBPA) or monoallelic (moCEBPA). We set out to explore whether the kind of CEBPA mutation is of prognostic relevance in cytogenetically normal AML (CN-AML). Patients and Methods: 467 homogeneously treated CN-AML patients were subdivided into moCEBPA, biCEBPA and wildtype (wt) CEBPA patients. The subgroups were analyzed for clinical parameters and for additional mutations in the NPM1, FLT3 and MLL genes. Furthermore, we obtained gene expression profiles (GEP) for a subgroup of 61 patients using oligonucleotide microarrays. 61 bone-marrow samples from CN-AML patients were analyzed using Affymetrix HG-U133 oligonucleotide microarrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Sample preparation, hybridization and image acquisition were performed according to standard Affymetrix protocols. Custom chip definition files based on the GeneAnnot database were used for data analysis (Ferrari et al, BMC Bioinformatics 8:446). The twilight algorithm was used to comapre gene expression profiles of patients with wildtype CEBPA and mono- and biallelic CEBPA mutations.

ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens

SUBMITTER: Manuela Hummel

PROVIDER: E-GEOD-15210 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Acute myeloid leukemia with biallelic CEBPA gene mutations and normal karyotype represents a distinct genetic entity associated with a favorable clinical outcome.

Dufour Annika A Schneider Friederike F Metzeler Klaus H KH Hoster Eva E Schneider Stephanie S Zellmeier Evelyn E Benthaus Tobias T Sauerland Maria-Cristina MC Berdel Wolfgang E WE Büchner Thomas T Wörmann Bernhard B Braess Jan J Hiddemann Wolfgang W Bohlander Stefan K SK Spiekermann Karsten K

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20091228 4

<h4>Purpose</h4>CEBPA mutations are found as either biallelic (biCEBPA) or monoallelic (moCEBPA). We set out to explore whether the kind of CEBPA mutation is of prognostic relevance in cytogenetically normal (CN) acute myeloid leukemia (AML).<h4>Patients and methods</h4>Four hundred sixty-seven homogeneously treated patients with CN-AML were subdivided into moCEBPA, biCEBPA, and wild-type (wt) CEBPA patients. The subgroups were analyzed for clinical parameters and for additional mutations in the ...[more]

PMID: 20038735

Similar Datasets

Project description:By WHO 2008, CEBPA-mutated AML became a provisional subentity, but it remains to be clarified how CEBPAmut AML with multilineage dysplasia (MLD; ?50% dysplastic cells in 2-3 lineages) but no other MDS-related feature should be classified. We investigated 108 CEBPAmut AML (15.7-87.6 years) for the impact of MLD and genetic features. MLD-positive patients differed from MLD-negative only by lower mean WBC counts (p=0.004), but not by other blood values, biologic characteristics, cytogenetic risk profiles, or additional molecular markers (NPM1mut, FLT3-ITD/TKD, RUNX1, MLL-PTD, IDH1/2). Biallelic CEBPAmut differed from wild-type-cases by differential expression of 213 genes, but did not differ significantly between MLD-positive/-negative patients. Survival outcomes were improved for females and those <60 years, intermediate versus adverse karyotypes (p=0.021), and for biallelic versus monoallelic/homozygous CEBPAmut (p=0.060) in case of FLT3-ITD-negativity. In contrast, 2-year OS (MLD+: 56.5%; MLD-: 65.5%) and 2-year EFS (MLD+: 13.8 months; MLD-: 16.3 months) did not differ significantly between MLD-positive/-negative patients. By univariable Cox regression analysis, gender, age, WBC count and MRC-cytogenetic risk category only were prognostically relevant for OS, while MLD was irrelevant. Therefore, CEBPAmut AML patients should be characterized only according to mut-status, cytogenetic risk groups, or additional mutations, whereas dysplasia is not relevant for this subtype. The sample preparation assay for gene expression profiling using Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 microarrays and subsequent data analysis were previously described. Only cases with biallelic CEBPA mutations were investigated by gene expression profiling due to previous reports that only double mutated cases conferred a specific gene expression signature, while monoallelic cases could not be discriminated from CEBPA wild-type cases. We performed comparison of gene expression profiles of 20 cases with biallelic CEBPA mutations and of 10 cases without CEBPA mutations.

Project description:PURPOSE: To evaluate frequency, biological features and clinical relevance of RUNX1 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Diagnostic samples from 945 patients (18 to 60 years) were analyzed for RUNX1 mutations. In a subset of cases (n=269) microarray gene expression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Fifty-nine RUNX1 mutations were identified in 53 of 945 (5.6%) cases, predominantly in exons 3 (n=11), 4 (n=10) and 8 (n=23). RUNX1 mutations clustered in the intermediate-risk cytogenetic group (46/640, 7.2%; cytogenetically normal, 34/538, 6.3%), they were less frequent in adverse-risk cytogenetics (5/109, 4.6%), and absent in core-binding-factor AML (0/77) and acute promyelocytic leukemia (0/61); RUNX1 mutations were associated with MLL-partial tandem duplications (p=0.0007) and IDH1/IDH2 mutations (p=0.03), inversely correlated with NPM1 (p<0.0001) and in trend with CEBPA (p=0.10) mutations. RUNX1 mutations were characterized by a distinct gene expression pattern; this RUNX1 mutation-derived signature was not exclusive for the mutation, but also included mostly adverse-risk AML [eg, 7q-, -7, inv(3) or t(3;3)]. RUNX1 mutations predicted for resistance to chemotherapy (rates of refractory disease 30% and 19%, p=0.047, for RUNX1-mutated and wildtype patients, respectively), as well as inferior event-free survival (EFS; p<0.0001), relapse-free survival (RFS, p=0.022), and overall survival (p=0.051). In multivariable analysis, RUNX1 mutations were an independent prognostic marker for shorter EFS (p=0.007). Explorative subgroup analysis revealed that allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation had a favorable impact on RFS in RUNX1-mutated patients (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: AML with RUNX1 mutations exhibit distinct biological properties and are associated with resistance to therapy and inferior outcome. A total of 269 RNA samples derived from adult AML patients were provided by the German Austrian AML Study Group (AMLSG) [AMLSG trial AML HD98A (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00146120)]. Conventional cytogenetic banding, and FLT3, CEBPA and NPM1 mutational analysis were performed as previously described (Schlenk et al., N Engl J Med 2008). Detailed clinical, cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic information are also provided in the supplementary information. Following enrichment, all samples contained at least 80% leukemic cells. Gene expression profiling (GEP) was performed as previously described (Bullinger et al., N Engl J Med 2004).

Dataset Information

Gene expression profiles of mono- and biallelic CEBPA mutations in cytogenetically normal AML

Publications

Acute myeloid leukemia with biallelic CEBPA gene mutations and normal karyotype represents a distinct genetic entity associated with a favorable clinical outcome.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure