Metabolomics,Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

Comparison of Hi-C results using in-solution versus in-nucleus ligation

ABSTRACT: Chromosome conformation capture (3C) and derivative (4C, 5C and Hi-C) methods employ ligation of diluted cross-linked chromatin complexes, intended to favor proximity-dependent, intra-complex ligation. We previously described an alternative Hi-C protocol with ligation in preserved nuclei rather than in solution. Here we directly compare Hi-C methods employing "in-nucleus ligation" and the standard "in-solution ligation". The results show that in-nucleus ligation captures chromatin interactions more consistently over a wider range of distances, and significantly reduces both experimental noise and bias. Thus in-nucleus ligation not only simplifies the experimental procedures, but also produces higher quality data with benefits for the entire range of 3C applications. We created Hi-C libraries by two different methods, in-solution ligation and in-nucleus ligation, from two biological replicates each of mouse foetal liver cells (mouse-1 and mouse-2) and human ES cells (human-1 and human-2) or the mixture of these two species. We also sequenced a random ligation library prepared by reversal of the cross-links and purification of the DNA prior to ligation.

ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus

SUBMITTER: Steven Wingett

PROVIDER: E-GEOD-70181 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:2×10^7 HL60 cells were treated with 10 uM ATRA for 2 and 5 days, and conducted Hi-C to study the chromosomal architecture. Cells were fixed by 1% formaldehyde (v/v) for 15 min at room temperature (RT) with slowly rotation. Cells were lysed by 550 μl lysis buffer (500 μl 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 10 mM NaCl, 0.2% Igepal CA-630 and 50 μl protease inhibitors) using a homogenizer, and harvested the chromatin at 5,000 rpm and washed twice. The pellet was added 1% SDS and incubated at 65 oC for 10 min, then quenched by Triton X-100. The chromatin was digested by 600 U MboI (NEB, Ipswich, USA) at 37 oC overnight. The next day, enzymes were inactivated by 10% SDS at 65 oC for 30 min, and the restriction fragment overhangs were filled in using biotin-14-dCTP and Klenow at 37 oC for 45 min, and the ligation was conducted in 7.61 ml ligation mix (745 μl 10% Triton X-100, 745 μl 10x ligation buffer (500 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 100 mM MgCl2, 100 mM DTT), 80 μl 10 mg/ml BSA, 80 μl 100 mM ATP and 5.96 ml water) for 4 h at 16°C. The blunt-end Hi-C ligation was sonicated and pull down by streptavidin beads, then purified by ethanol. Hi-C library was prepared for paired ending sequencing using NEBNext® UltraTM DNA Library Prep Kit for Illuina® (NEB). For regular 3C ligation, after enzymes inactivation, 10 μl 1 U/μl T4 DNA ligase was added to incubate at 16°C overnight. The interaction was detected by qPCR using the specific 3C primers (Table 1) followed by DNA purification. Hi-C was conducted in PE-150. An iterative method for Hi-C mapping with initial length 30bp, if it fails to map uniquely, the next round of mapping for additional 20 bp continued, this procedure lasts until the full read length reaches 150bp. The Hi-C reads were mapped to the human reference genome (assembly GRCh38) using bowtie2 (v2.2.9). The reads mapped to the same restriction fragment, the reads less than 500bp and PCR duplicates were all removed. Hi-C contact maps were normalized using ICE.

Dataset Information

Comparison of Hi-C results using in-solution versus in-nucleus ligation

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure