Metabolomics,Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

Times series of cells synchronized by double thymidine block

ABSTRACT: HaCat cell cycle experiment: During the somatic cell cycle, DNA and epigenetic modifications in DNA and histones are copied to daughter cells. DNA replication timing is tightly regulated and linked to GC content, chromatin structure, andgene transcription, but how maintenance of histone modifications relates to replication timing and transcription is less understood.The gene expression patters on HaCaT keratinocytes during the cell cycle is studied by a time series analysis of synchroniced cells sampled at 3 hour intervals. We show that genes enriched with the repressive chromatin mark histone H3 lysine 27 tri-methylation are transcribed during DNA replication . The gene expression is related to replication timing, as genes expressed during G1/S transition andearly S phase generally have higher GC content and are replicated earlier than genes expressed during late S phase. These results indicate widespread replication-dependent expression in mammals and support a role for replication in transiently activating transcription of epigenetically silenced genes.

ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens

SUBMITTER: Endre Anderssen

PROVIDER: E-MTAB-454 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Transcription profiling during the cell cycle shows that a subset of Polycomb-targeted genes is upregulated during DNA replication.

Peña-Diaz Javier J Hegre Siv A SA Anderssen Endre E Aas Per A PA Mjelle Robin R Gilfillan Gregor D GD Lyle Robert R Drabløs Finn F Krokan Hans E HE Sætrom Pål P

Nucleic acids research 20130115 5

Genome-wide gene expression analyses of the human somatic cell cycle have indicated that the set of cycling genes differ between primary and cancer cells. By identifying genes that have cell cycle dependent expression in HaCaT human keratinocytes and comparing these with previously identified cell cycle genes, we have identified three distinct groups of cell cycle genes. First, housekeeping genes enriched for known cell cycle functions; second, cell type-specific genes enriched for HaCaT-specifi ...[more]

PMID: 23325852

Similar Datasets

Project description:DNA replication of eukaryotic chromosomes initiates at a number of discrete loci, called replication origins. Distribution and regulation of origins are important for complete duplication of the genome. Here, we determined locations of Orc1 and Mcm6, components of pre-replicative complex (pre-RC), on whole genome of Schizosaccharomyces pombe using a high-resolution tiling array. Pre-RC sites were identified in 460 intergenic regions, where Orc1 and Mcm6 colocalized. By mapping of 5-bromo-2â-deoxyuridine (BrdU)-incorporated DNA in the presence of hydroxyurea (HU), 307 pre-RC sites were identified as early-firing origins. In contrast, 153 pre-RC sites without BrdU incorporation were considered to be late and/or inefficient origins. Early and late origins tend to distribute separately in large chromosome regions. Inactivation of replication checkpoint by deletion of Cds1 resulted in BrdU incorporation with HU specifically at the late origins. An origin-exchange experiment showed that replication timing was not intrinsic to origin but dependent on its surrounding region. Interestingly, pericentromeric heterochromatin and the silent mating type locus replicated in the presence of HU, while the inner centromere or subtelomeric heterochromatin did not. Notably, MCM did not bind to inner centromeres where ORC was located. Thus, replication is differentially regulated in chromosome domains. Keywords: ChIP-chip analysis Experiment Design: â¢ The goal of the experiment â Genome-wide localization of ORC and MCM binding sites and identification of replication origins in Shizosaccaromyces pombe â¢ A brief description of the experiment (e.g., the abstract from the related publication) DNA replication of eukaryotic chromosomes initiates at a number of discrete loci, called replication origins. Distribution and regulation of origins are important for complete duplication of the genome. Here, we determined locations of Orc1 and Mcm6, components of pre-replicative complex (pre-RC), on whole genome of Schizosaccharomyces pombe using a high-resolution tiling array. Pre-RC sites were identified in 460 intergenic regions, where Orc1 and Mcm6 colocalized. By mapping of 5-bromo-2â-deoxyuridine (BrdU)-incorporated DNA in the presence of hydroxyurea (HU), 307 pre-RC sites were identified as early-firing origins. In contrast, 153 pre-RC sites without BrdU incorporation were considered to be late and/or inefficient origins. Early and late origins tend to distribute separately in large chromosome regions. Inactivation of replication checkpoint by deletion of Cds1 resulted in BrdU incorporation with HU specifically at the late origins. An origin-exchange experiment showed that replication timing was not intrinsic to origin but dependent on its surrounding region. Interestingly, pericentromeric heterochromatin and the silent mating type locus replicated in the presence of HU, while the inner centromere or subtelomeric heterochromatin did not. Notably, MCM did not bind to inner centromeres where ORC was located. Thus, replication is differentially regulated in chromosome domains. â¢ Keywords, for example, time course, cell type comparison, array CGH (the use of MGED ontology terms is recommended). Mitosis, Cell cycle, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Whole-genome, Tiling array, Chromosome II, III array, Orc1, Orc4, Mcm6, BrdU-labeling, cds1Î. â¢ Experimental factors Distribution of the Orc1 and Mcm6 in WT in G1 phase (S. pombe). Distribution of the Orc4 in WT in asynchronous cells (S. pombe). Distribution of BrdU-incorporated DNA in WT and in cds1 deletion mutant in S phase in the presence of HU (S. pombe). â¢ Experimental design ChIP analysis: In all cases, hybridization data for ChIP fraction was compared with WCE (whole cell extract) fraction. Pombe whole-genome tiling array were used. BrdU analysis: Hybridization data for BrdU fraction (replicated DNA) was compared with Whole fraction (unreplicated DNA) or hybridization data for BrdU fraction of cds1Î cells was compared with that of WT cells. Pombe whole-genome tiling array were used. â¢ Quality control steps taken Different subunits of the same complex. Confirmation of several loci by q-PCR. Checking the BrdU-labeled DNA fraction in CsCl gradient by q-PCR or slot-blot analysis. â¢ Links to the publication, any supplemental websites or database accession numbers. GSE6523 Samples used, extract preparation and labelling: â¢ The origin of each biological sample ChIP analysis: Schizosaccharomyces pombe nda3-KM311 cdc10-129 strain harboring pREP81-cdc18 and pREP42-cdt1. BrdU analysis: Schizosaccharomyces pombe wild type (cdc25-22 nmt1-TK) and cds1Î strains. â¢ Manipulation of biological samples and protocols used ChIP analysis: Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) in G1 arrested cells or asynchronous cells were performed as previously described (Takahashi et al., 2003, EMBO). Hybridization to Affimetrix high-density oligonucleotide array of S. pombe chromosomes 2 and 3 and whole genome tiling array of S. pombe was performed essentially as previously described (Katou et al., 2003, nature) (Lengronne et al., 2004, nature). BrdU analysis: Growing cdc25-22 cells expressing Thymidine Kinase were arrested at G2/M boundary and released in the presence of BrdU and HU. BrdU was incorporated in nascent DNA in following S phase. The genomic DNA was digested by HaeIII and BrdU-labeled DNA was purified in CsCl density gradient centrifugation. Hybridization to Affimetrix high-density oligonucleotide array of S. pombe whole genome tiling array was performed essentially as previously described (Katou et al., 2003, nature) (Lengronne et al., 2004, nature).

Project description:Chromosomal DNA replication involves the coordinated activity of hundreds to thousands of replication origins. Individual replication origins are subject to epigenetic regulation of their activity during S-phase, resulting in differential efficiencies and timings of replication initiation during S-phase. This regulation is thought to involve chromatin structure and organization into timing domains with differential ability to recruit limiting replication factors. Rif1 has recently been identified as a genome-wide regulator of replication timing in fission yeast and in mammalian cells. However, previous studies in budding yeast have suggested that Rif1’s role in controlling replication timing may be limited to subtelomeric domains and derives from its established role in telomere length regulation. We have analyzed replication timing by analyzing BrdU incorporation genome-wide, and report that Rif1 regulates the timing of late/dormant replication origins throughout the S. cerevisiae genome. Analysis of pfa4∆ cells, which are defective in palmitoylation and membrane association of Rif1, suggests that replication timing regulation by Rif1 is independent of its role in localizing telomeres to the nuclear periphery. Intra-S checkpoint signaling is intact in rif1∆ cells, and checkpoint-defective mec1∆ cells do not comparably deregulate replication timing, together indicating that Rif1 regulates replication timing through a mechanism independent of this checkpoint. Our results indicate that the Rif1 mechanism regulates origin timing irrespective of proximity to a chromosome end, and suggest instead that telomere sequences merely provide abundant binding sites for proteins that recruit Rif1. Still, the abundance of Rif1 binding in telomeric domains may facilitate Rif1-mediated repression of non-telomeric origins that are more distal from centromeres. 30 total samples: (6 samples - BrdU- HU arrest 45min with 2 replicates, strains: WT, rif1 delta, pfa4 delta) (12 samples -S-phase BrdU time course with 2 replicates at 25 and 35 min, strains: WT, rif1 delta, mec1_100) (12 samples - S-phase BrdU time course with 2 replicates at 25 and 35 min, strains: sml1 delta, sml1 delta rif1 delta, sml1 delta mec1 delta)

Project description:Chromosomal DNA replication involves the coordinated activity of hundreds to thousands of replication origins. Individual replication origins are subject to epigenetic regulation of their activity during S-phase, resulting in differential efficiencies and timings of replication initiation during S-phase. This regulation is thought to involve chromatin structure and organization into timing domains with differential ability to recruit limiting replication factors. Rif1 has recently been identified as a genome-wide regulator of replication timing in fission yeast and in mammalian cells. However, previous studies in budding yeast have suggested that Rif1’s role in controlling replication timing may be limited to subtelomeric domains and derives from its established role in telomere length regulation. We have analyzed replication timing by analyzing BrdU incorporation genome-wide, and report that Rif1 regulates the timing of late/dormant replication origins throughout the S. cerevisiae genome. Analysis of pfa4∆ cells, which are defective in palmitoylation and membrane association of Rif1, suggests that replication timing regulation by Rif1 is independent of its role in localizing telomeres to the nuclear periphery. Intra-S checkpoint signaling is intact in rif1∆ cells, and checkpoint-defective mec1∆ cells do not comparably deregulate replication timing, together indicating that Rif1 regulates replication timing through a mechanism independent of this checkpoint. Our results indicate that the Rif1 mechanism regulates origin timing irrespective of proximity to a chromosome end, and suggest instead that telomere sequences merely provide abundant binding sites for proteins that recruit Rif1. Still, the abundance of Rif1 binding in telomeric domains may facilitate Rif1-mediated repression of non-telomeric origins that are more distal from centromeres. 4 samples BrdU-IP-seq in HU, 2 strains with 2-replicates each (strains:WT and rif1 delta)

Project description:The organization of mammalian DNA replication is poorly understood. We have produced genome-wide high-resolution dynamic maps of the timing of replication in human erythroid, mesenchymal and embryonic stem cells using TimEX, a method that relies on gaussian convolution of massive, highly redundant determinations of DNA copy number variations during S phase obtained using either high-density oligonucleotide tiling arrays or massively-parallel sequencing to produce replication timing profiles. We show that in untransformed human cells, timing of replication is highly regulated and highly synchronous, and that many genomic segments are replicated in temporal transition regions devoid of initiation where replication forks progress unidirectionally from origins that can be hundreds of kilobases away. Absence of initiation in one transition region is shown at the molecular level by SMARD analysis. Comparison of ES and erythroid cells replication patterns revealed that these cells replicate about 20% of their genome in different quarter of S phase and that ES cells replicate a larger proportion of their genome in early S phase than erythroid cells. Importantly, we detected a strong inverse relationship between timing of replication and distance to the closest expressed gene. This relationship can be used to predict tissue specific timing of replication profiles from expression data and genomic annotations. We also provide evidence that early origins of replication are preferentially located near highly expressed genes, that mid firing origins are located near moderately expressed genes and that late firing origins are located far from genes. Comparison of S/G1 from ES cells, MSCs and erythroid cells The purpose of the study was to measure replication timing by taking advantage of the fact that copy number of DNA increases from 2 two 4 during replication. Specifically, the study was designed to compare the number of copies of DNA of cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle with the number of copies of DNA of cells in the S phase of the cell cycle. The cells in G1 and S of the cell cycle were obtained by sorting cells based on DNA content after staining with propidium iodide, a fluorescent compound that binds to DNA. We first tested the strategy with Nimblegen tiling arrays representing about 3% of the genome and found that it was indeed possible to measure such a small difference of copy number if a high-level of redundancy was used. We then extended the study genome-wide using massively parallel sequencing on either the SolID or the Illumina platform. Both platforms were tested and we found that for that application, both platforms were equivalent and provided sufficient number of reads to measure timing of replication genome-wide. We then attempted to better understand the correlation between timing of replication and transcription. We therefore obtained RNA from hESC and from erythroblast and hybridized them to standard Affymetrix U133plus2 arrays. This analysis revealed that it was possible to predict the replication timing patterns with relatively good accuracy (r=0.8) using expression data and distance of every genomic windows to express genes.

Dataset Information

Times series of cells synchronized by double thymidine block

Publications

Transcription profiling during the cell cycle shows that a subset of Polycomb-targeted genes is upregulated during DNA replication.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure