Dataset Information

Camel Milk Cannot Prevent the Development of Cow's Milk Allergy-A Study in Brown Norway Rats.

ABSTRACT:

Scope

Currently there are no specific recommendations for the use of any particular infant formula in the prevention of cow's milk allergy (CMA). Recently, there has been an increasing interest in alternative infant formulas based on milk proteins from other sources than the cow, including milk from other mammalians such as goat, sheep, donkey, horse, and camel. Whereas these have been studied for their usability in CMA management, there are no studies of their CMA preventive capacity. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate whether camel milk can prevent CMA and vice versa.

Methods and results

The capacity of camel milk in preventing CMA and vice versa is evaluated in a well-established prophylactic Brown Norway rat model. IgG1, IgE, and IgA responses, allergy elicitation, intestinal and mLN gene expression, and protein uptake are analyzed. The study demonstrates that camel and cow's milk in general has an insignificant cross-preventive capacity. Yet, whereas cow's milk is shown to have a low transient capacity to prevent sensitization and clinically active camel milk allergy, camel milk does not show this effect for CMA.

Conclusions

This study suggests that due to lack of cross-tolerance camel milk cannot be used for CMA prevention.

SUBMITTER: Maryniak NZ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10078016 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Camel Milk Cannot Prevent the Development of Cow's Milk Allergy-A Study in Brown Norway Rats.

Maryniak Natalia Zofia NZ Stage Mette Halkjaer MH Ballegaard Anne-Sofie Ravn AR Sancho Ana Isabel AI Hansen Egon Bech EB Bøgh Katrine Lindholm KL

Molecular nutrition & food research 20221205 2

<h4>Scope</h4>Currently there are no specific recommendations for the use of any particular infant formula in the prevention of cow's milk allergy (CMA). Recently, there has been an increasing interest in alternative infant formulas based on milk proteins from other sources than the cow, including milk from other mammalians such as goat, sheep, donkey, horse, and camel. Whereas these have been studied for their usability in CMA management, there are no studies of their CMA preventive capacity. T ...[more]

PMID: 36415026

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCow's milk is a food allergen of public health importance both in the United States and globally. Its natural history and epidemiology have been most studied among infants and young children, but the public health burden it places on adults and older pediatric populations remains unclear. This study comprehensively characterizes the US population-level burden of cow's milk allergy (CMA), including its prevalence, severity, health care utilization, psychosocial impact, natural history, and other associated factors-including ability to tolerate extensively heated milk products-within a large, nationally-representative survey sample of US households.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was administered via web and telephone. Population level inference was based on data collected from participants recruited from National Opinion Research Center (NORC) at the University of Chicago's probability-based AmeriSpeak panel. Established dual-sample complex survey calibration methods were used to augment this sample with additional participants recruited through Survey Sampling International to increase the precision of the resulting estimates. In total, surveys were administered to a nationally representative sample of 51 819 US households from October 1, 2015, through September 31, 2016. Self-report responses from 40 453 adults and parent-proxy report for 38 408 children were analyzed.ResultsAnalyzing survey responses from 78 851 individuals, an estimated 4.7% (95% CI, 4.4%-4.9%) of the US population reported current CMA, whereas 1.9% (95% CI, 1.8%-2.1%) met symptom-report criteria for convincing IgE-mediated allergy. An estimated 0.9% (95% CI, 0.8%-1.0%) had CMA that met convincing symptom-report criteria and was physician diagnosed. Female and White respondents were more likely to report outgrowing CMA relative to males and those reporting other races and ethnicities. Individuals with CMA who reported tolerance to baked milk products were less likely to report severe reaction histories (33.5% vs 42.7%; p = .03), a lifetime history of food allergy-related emergency department visits (43.4% vs. 55.8%; p = .005), and treating a milk-allergic reaction with epinephrine (10.6 vs. 18.9%; p = .003). These individuals also exhibited less psychosocial burden on the validated Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) than their counterparts with CMA who were allergic to baked forms of milk.ConclusionThese data indicate a discrepancy in reported rates of allergy to cow's milk among the US general population ranging from approximately 1 in 20 with reported CMA to fewer than 1 in 50 with physician-confirmed CMA. However, they suggest a substantial population-level burden of CMA, including substantial healthcare utilization, psychosocial burden and nutritional impacts-particularly among the approximately 30% of individuals with CMA who cannot tolerate baked forms of milk.

Dataset Information

Camel Milk Cannot Prevent the Development of Cow's Milk Allergy-A Study in Brown Norway Rats.

Scope

Methods and results

Conclusions

Publications

Camel Milk Cannot Prevent the Development of Cow's Milk Allergy-A Study in Brown Norway Rats.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets