Dataset Information

Patients' Perspectives, Factors, and Patterns of eHealth Use in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

eHealth supports the delivery of relevant health information and management of chronic disease. However, little is known about patients' perspectives and the determinants of eHealth use among kidney transplant recipients.

Methods

Kidney transplant recipients aged 18 years and older from 3 transplant units in Australia and the Better Evidence and Translation in Chronic Kidney Disease consumer network completed a survey with free-text responses relating to eHealth uptake. Multivariable regression modeling was used to determine the factors associated with eHealth use. Free-text responses were thematically analyzed.

Results

Of the 117 participants who were invited in person and who responded to the email, 91 completed the survey. Sixty-three participants (69%) were current eHealth users (active use of eHealth tools), and 91% had access to eHealth devices, including smartphones (81%) and computers (59%). Most (98%) reported that eHealth improves posttransplant care. Factors associated with increased eHealth use (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]) were higher eHealth literacy scale (eHEALS) score (1.21 [1.06-1.38]) and tertiary education (7.78 [2.19-27.7]). We identified the following 3 themes on eHealth determinants: (i) empowering self-management, (ii) enhancing health services, and (iii) technology burden.

Conclusions

Transplant recipients believe that eHealth interventions have the potential to improve their posttransplant care. eHealth interventions should meet the needs of all transplant recipients and be accessible to those with lower educational attainment.

SUBMITTER: Tang J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10105051 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Patients' Perspectives, Factors, and Patterns of eHealth Use in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Tang James J Howell Martin M Lee Vincent W VW Guha Chandana C Dominello Amanda A Roger Simon S Keung Karen K Teixeira-Pinto Armando A Tong Allison A Wong Germaine G

Kidney international reports 20230120 4

<h4>Introduction</h4>eHealth supports the delivery of relevant health information and management of chronic disease. However, little is known about patients' perspectives and the determinants of eHealth use among kidney transplant recipients.<h4>Methods</h4>Kidney transplant recipients aged 18 years and older from 3 transplant units in Australia and the Better Evidence and Translation in Chronic Kidney Disease consumer network completed a survey with free-text responses relating to eHealth uptak ...[more]

PMID: 37069969

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectivesOlder kidney transplant recipients are susceptible to cognitive impairment, frailty, comorbidities, immunosuppression-related complications, and chronic graft failure, however, there has been limited focus on their concerns and expectations related to transplantation. This study aims to describe the perspectives of older kidney transplant recipients about their experience of kidney transplantation, self-management, and treatment goals to inform strategies and interventions that address their specific needs.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsFace-to-face semistructured interviews were conducted with 30 kidney transplant recipients aged 65-80 years from five renal units in Australia. Transcripts were analyzed thematically.ResultsSix themes were identified: restoring vitality of youth (with subthemes of revived mindset for resilience, embracing enjoyment in life, drive for self-actualization); persisting through prolonged recovery (yielding to aging, accepting functional limitations, pushing the limit, enduring treatment responsibilities); imposing sicknesses (combatting devastating comorbidities, painful restrictions, emerging disillusionment, anxieties about accumulating side effects, consuming treatment burden); prioritizing graft survival (privileged with a miracle, negotiating risks for longevity, enacting a moral duty, preserving the last opportunity); confronting health deterioration (vulnerability and helplessness, narrowing focus to immediate concerns, uncertainty of survival); and value of existence (purpose through autonomy, refusing the burden of futile treatment, staying alive by all means).ConclusionsOlder kidney transplant recipients felt able to enjoy life and strived to live at their newly re-established potential and capability, which motivated them to protect their graft. However, some felt constrained by slow recuperation and overwhelmed by unexpected comorbidities, medication-related side effects, and health decline. Our findings suggest the need to prepare and support older recipients for self-management responsibilities, clarify their expectations of post-transplant risks and outcomes, and provide assistance through prolonged recovery after kidney transplantation.

Project description:BackgroundCalcineurin inhibitors (CNI; cyclosporine, tacrolimus) are critical for kidney transplant immunosuppression, but have multiple potential drug interactions, such as with macrolide antibiotics. Macrolide antibiotics (clarithromycin, erythromycin, and azithromycin) are often used to treat atypical infections. Clarithromycin and erythromycin inhibit CNI metabolism and increase the risk of CNI nephrotoxicity, while azithromycin does not.ObjectiveTo determine the frequency of CNI-macrolide co-prescriptions, the proportion who receive post-prescription monitoring, and the risk of adverse drug events in kidney transplant recipients.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingWe used linked health care databases in Alberta, Canada.PatientsWe included 293 adult kidney transplant recipients from 2008-2015 who were co-prescribed a CNI and macrolide.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was a composite of all-cause hospitalization, acute kidney injury (creatinine increase ≥0.3 mg/dL or 1.5 times baseline), or death within 30 days of the macrolide prescription.MethodsWe identified CNI-macrolide co-prescriptions and compared outcomes in those who received clarithromycin/erythromycin versus azithromycin. We used a linear mixed-effects model to examine the mean change in serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).ResultsOf the 293 recipients who were co-prescribed a CNI and a macrolide, 38% (n = 112) were prescribed clarithromycin/erythromycin while 62% (n = 181) were prescribed azithromycin. Compared with azithromycin users, clarithromycin/erythromycin users were less likely to have outpatient serum creatinine monitoring post-prescription (56% vs 69%, P = .03). There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between the 2 groups (17% vs 11%, P = .11); however, the risk of all-cause hospitalization was higher in the clarithromycin/erythromycin group (10% vs 3%, P = .02). The mean decrement in eGFR was significantly greater in the clarithromycin/erythromycin versus azithromycin group (-5.4 vs -1.9 mL/min/1.73 m2, P < .05).LimitationsWe did not have CNI levels to correlate with the timing of CNI-macrolide co-prescriptions. We also did not have information regarding the indications for macrolide prescriptions.ConclusionClarithromycin and erythromycin were frequently co-prescribed in kidney transplant recipients on CNIs despite known drug interactions. Clarithromycin/erythromycin use was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization compared with azithromycin users. Safer prescribing practices in kidney transplant recipients are warranted.

Project description:BackgroundThe rising prevalence of end-stage renal failure in the elderly has led to an increased number of kidney transplantations in older individuals. While age does not solely determine transplant eligibility, frailty in elderly recipients significantly impacts post-transplant outcomes, particularly within the first year.MethodsThe RETRAITE (REnal TRAnsplantIon ouTcome in Elderly recipients) study, a single-center retrospective cohort study at Grenoble Alpes University Hospital (France), examined kidney transplant recipients aged 70 years and above transplanted between 2015 and 2020. The composite primary endpoint was defined as either of any hospital stay exceeding 40 days, death and/or return to dialysis within the first post-transplant year. The study explored risk factors for recipient and graft survival, rejection, hospitalizations over 40 days, and severe infections during the initial post-transplant year.ResultsOver six years, 149 patients aged 70 years or older received transplants. Eleven patients died, and seven returned to dialysis within the first year, corresponding to a 1-year graft survival rate of 87.9%. At 1 year, 49 patients (33%) met the composite endpoint. There was a significant association between the composite endpoint and curative anticoagulation [odds ratio (OR) 5.20; P < .001], peripheral arteriopathy (OR 3.14; P < .001) and delayed graft function (OR 8.24; P < .001). This cohort then was merged with a cohort of 150 younger kidney transplanted patients and we confirmed these results. Time on dialysis, prolonged cold ischemia and donor age contributed to higher morbidity and mortality. Conversely, preemptive and living donor transplants were associated with lower morbidity and mortality.ConclusionsIn this cohort aged over 70 years, age alone did not statistically correlate with increased morbidity and mortality. Variables related to grafts and donors, especially curative anticoagulation, were linked to poorer outcomes, emphasizing the favorable impact of preemptive and living donor transplants on morbidity and mortality in elderly patients.

Dataset Information

Patients' Perspectives, Factors, and Patterns of eHealth Use in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Patients' Perspectives, Factors, and Patterns of eHealth Use in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets