Dataset Information

Aurora A kinase inhibition compromises its antitumor efficacy by elevating PD-L1 expression.

ABSTRACT: Aurora A plays a critical role in G2/M transition and mitosis, making it an attractive target for cancer treatment. Aurora A inhibitors showed remarkable antitumor effects in preclinical studies, but unsatisfactory outcomes in clinical trials have greatly limited their development. In this study, the Aurora A inhibitor alisertib upregulated programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in a panel of tumor cells both in vitro and in vivo. Upregulation of the checkpoint protein PD-L1 reduced antitumor immunity in immune-competent mice, paradoxically inhibiting the antitumor effects of alisertib. Mechanistically, Aurora A directly bound to and phosphorylated cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS), suppressing PD-L1 expression in tumor cells. Aurora A inhibition by alisertib activated the cGAS/stimulator of IFN genes (STING)/NF-κB pathway and promoted PD-L1 expression. Combining alisertib with anti-PD-L1 antibody improved antitumor immunity and enhanced the antitumor effects of alisertib in immune-competent mice. Our results, which reveal the immunomodulatory functions of Aurora A inhibitors and provide a plausible explanation for the poor clinical outcomes with their use, offer a potential approach to improve the antitumor efficacy of these inhibitors.

SUBMITTER: Wang X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10145933 | biostudies-literature | 2023 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Aurora A kinase inhibition compromises its antitumor efficacy by elevating PD-L1 expression.

Wang Xiaobo X Huang Jing J Liu Fenglin F Yu Qian Q Wang Ruina R Wang Jiaqi J Zhu Zewen Z Yu Juan J Hou Jun J Shim Joong Sup JS Jiang Wei W Li Zengxia Z Zhang Yuanyuan Y Dang Yongjun Y

The Journal of clinical investigation 20230501 9

Aurora A plays a critical role in G2/M transition and mitosis, making it an attractive target for cancer treatment. Aurora A inhibitors showed remarkable antitumor effects in preclinical studies, but unsatisfactory outcomes in clinical trials have greatly limited their development. In this study, the Aurora A inhibitor alisertib upregulated programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in a panel of tumor cells both in vitro and in vivo. Upregulation of the checkpoint protein PD-L1 reduced antitu ...[more]

PMID: 36928177

Similar Datasets

Project description:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the relative efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors versus conventional drugs in patients with cancer that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. DESIGN:Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES:PubMed, Embase, Cochrane database, and conference abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology up to March 2018. REVIEW METHODS:Studies of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors (avelumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab) that had available hazard ratios for death based on PD-L1 positivity or negativity were included. The threshold for PD-L1 positivity or negativity was that PD-L1 stained cell accounted for 1% of tumour cells, or tumour and immune cells, assayed by immunohistochemistry staining methods. RESULTS:4174 patients with advanced or metastatic cancers from eight randomised controlled trials were included in this study. Compared with conventional agents, PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors were associated with significantly prolonged overall survival in both patients that were PD-L1 positive (n=2254, hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.74) and PD-L1 negative (1920, 0.80, 0.71 to 0.90). However, the efficacies of PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade treatment in patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative were significantly different (P=0.02 for interaction). Additionally, in both patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative, the long term clinical benefits from PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade were observed consistently across interventional agent, cancer histotype, method of randomisation stratification, type of immunohistochemical scoring system, drug target, type of control group, and median follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS:PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy is a preferable treatment option over conventional therapy for both patients that are PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. This finding suggests that PD-L1 expression status alone is insufficient in determining which patients should be offered PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy.

Dataset Information

Aurora A kinase inhibition compromises its antitumor efficacy by elevating PD-L1 expression.

Publications

Aurora A kinase inhibition compromises its antitumor efficacy by elevating PD-L1 expression.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets