Clinical application of breathing-adapted 4D CT: image quality comparison to conventional 4D CT.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Purpose
4D CT imaging is an integral part of 4D radiotherapy workflows. However, 4D CT data often contain motion artifacts that mitigate treatment planning. Recently, breathing-adapted 4D CT (i4DCT) was introduced into clinical practice, promising artifact reduction in in-silico and phantom studies. Here, we present an image quality comparison study, pooling clinical patient data from two centers: a new i4DCT and a conventional spiral 4D CT patient cohort.Methods
The i4DCT cohort comprises 129 and the conventional spiral 4D CT cohort 417 4D CT data sets of lung and liver tumor patients. All data were acquired for treatment planning. The study consists of three parts: illustration of image quality in selected patients of the two cohorts with similar breathing patterns; an image quality expert rater study; and automated analysis of the artifact frequency.Results
Image data of the patients with similar breathing patterns underline artifact reduction by i4DCT compared to conventional spiral 4D CT. Based on a subgroup of 50 patients with irregular breathing patterns, the rater study reveals a fraction of almost artifact-free scans of 89% for i4DCT and only 25% for conventional 4D CT; the quantitative analysis indicated a reduction of artifact frequency by 31% for i4DCT.Conclusion
The results demonstrate 4D CT image quality improvement for patients with irregular breathing patterns by breathing-adapted 4D CT in this first corresponding clinical data image quality comparison study.
SUBMITTER: Werner R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10281893 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Clinical application of breathing-adapted 4D CT: image quality comparison to conventional 4D CT.
Werner René R Szkitsak Juliane J Madesta Frederic F Büttgen Laura L Wimmert Lukas L Sentker Thilo T Fietkau Rainer R Haderlein Marlen M Bert Christoph C Gauer Tobias T Hofmann Christian C
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] 20230331 7
<h4>Purpose</h4>4D CT imaging is an integral part of 4D radiotherapy workflows. However, 4D CT data often contain motion artifacts that mitigate treatment planning. Recently, breathing-adapted 4D CT (i4DCT) was introduced into clinical practice, promising artifact reduction in in-silico and phantom studies. Here, we present an image quality comparison study, pooling clinical patient data from two centers: a new i4DCT and a conventional spiral 4D CT patient cohort.<h4>Methods</h4>The i4DCT cohort ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundWe assessed and compared image quality obtained with clinical 18F-FDG whole-body oncologic PET protocols used in three different, state-of-the-art digital PET/CT and two conventional PMT-based PET/CT devices. Our goal was to evaluate an improved trade-off between administered activity (patient dose exposure/signal-to-noise ratio) and acquisition time (patient comfort) while preserving diagnostic information achievable with the recently introduced digital detector technology compared to previous analogue PET technology.MethodsWe performed list-mode (LM) PET acquisitions using a NEMA/IEC NU2 phantom, with activity concentrations of 5 kBq/mL and 25 kBq/mL for the background (9.5 L) and sphere inserts, respectively. For each device, reconstructions were obtained varying the image statistics (10, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 300 s from LM data) and the number of iterations (range 1 to 10) in addition to the employed local clinical protocol setup. We measured for each reconstructed dataset: the quantitative cross-calibration, the image noise on the uniform background assessed by the coefficient of variation (COV), and the recovery coefficients (RCs) evaluated in the hot spheres. Additionally, we compared the characteristic time-activity-product (TAP) that is the product of scan time per bed position × mass-activity administered (in min·MBq/kg) across datasets.ResultsGood system cross-calibration was obtained for all tested datasets with < 6% deviation from the expected value was observed. For all clinical protocol settings, image noise was compatible with clinical interpretation (COV < 15%). Digital PET showed an improved background signal-to-noise ratio as compared to conventional PMT-based PET. RCs were comparable between digital and PMT-based PET datasets. Compared to PMT-based PET, digital systems provided comparable image quality with lower TAP (from ~ 40% less and up to 70% less).ConclusionsThis study compared the achievable clinical image quality in three state-of-the-art digital PET/CT devices (from different vendors) as well as in two conventional PMT-based PET. Reported results show that a comparable image quality is achievable with a TAP reduction of ~ 40% in digital PET. This could lead to a significant reduction of the administered mass-activity and/or scan time with direct benefits in terms of dose exposure and patient comfort.
| S-EPMC6944719 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundEcho-Particle Image Velocimetry (echoPIV) tracks speckle patterns from ultrasound contrast agent(UCA), being less angle-sensitive than colour Doppler. High frame rate (HFR) echoPIV enables tracking of high velocity flow in the left ventricle (LV). We aimed to demonstrate the potential clinical use of HFR echoPIV and investigate the feasibility and accuracy in patients.MethodsNineteen patients admitted for heart failure were included. HFR contrast images were acquired from an apical long axis view (ALAX), using a fully-programmable ultrasound system. A clinical UCA was continuously infused with a dedicated pump. Additionally, echocardiographic images were obtained using a clinical system, including LV contrast-enhanced images and pulsed-wave (PW) Doppler of the LV inflow and outflow in ALAX. 11 patients underwent CMR and 4 cardiac CT as clinically indicated. These CMR and CT images were used as reference. In 10 patients with good echoPIV tracking and reference imaging, the intracavitary flow was compared between echoPIV, conventional and UCA echocardiography.ResultsEchoPIV tracking quality was good in 12/19 (63%), moderate in 2/19 (10%) and poor in 5/19 (26%) subjects. EchoPIV could determine inflow velocity in 17/19 (89%), and outflow in 14/19 (74%) patients. The correlation of echoPIV and PW Doppler was good for the inflow (R2 = 0.77 to PW peak; R2 = 0.80 PW mean velocity) and moderate for the outflow (R2 = 0.54 to PW peak; R2 = 0.44 to PW mean velocity), with a tendency for echoPIV to underestimate PW velocities. In selected patients, echoPIV was able in a single acquisition to demonstrate flow patterns which required multiple interrogations with classical echocardiography. Those flow patterns could also be linked to anatomical abnormalities as seen in CMR or CT.ConclusionHFR echoPIV tracks multidirectional and complex flow patterns which are unapparent with conventional echocardiography, while having comparable feasibility. EchoPIV tends to underestimate flow velocities as compared to PW Doppler. It has the potential to provide in one acquisition all the functional information obtained by conventional imaging, overcoming the angle dependency of Doppler and low frame rate of classical contrast imaging.
| S-EPMC9040345 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe combination of computed tomography angiography (CTA) and computed tomography perfusion (CTP) evaluation of cerebral perfusion status and vascular conditions can improve the diagnostic accuracy of infarction, ischemia, and vascular occlusion in stroke patients, as well as a comprehensive assessment of cerebral edema, collateral circulation, and blood perfusion in the lesion area. However, the consequent radiation safety and contrast agent nephropathy have aroused increasing concern. The purpose of this study was to assess the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of CTA images derived from CTP data, and to explore the feasibility of replacing conventional CTA.MethodsA total of 31 consecutive patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent head and neck CTA and brain CTP examinations. All the CTP images were transmitted to the ShuKun artificial intelligence system, which reconstructs CTA derived from CTP (CTA-DF-CTP). The images were divided into 2 groups, including CTA-DF-CTP (Group A) and conventional CTA (Group B). The CT attenuation values, subjective image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), image quality, CT volume dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP), and effective radiation dose (ED) were compared between the 2 groups. Moreover, the consistency of vascular stenosis and stenosis degree between the 2 groups were measured and evaluated.ResultsThere were no significant differences in image noise, SNR, or CNR between Groups A and B (P>0.05). The CT attenuation values of the arteries were higher in Group A than in B [internal carotid artery (ICA) =548±112 vs. 454±85 Hounsfield units (HU), middle cerebral artery (MCA) =453±118 vs. 388±70 HU, and basilar artery (BA) =431±99 vs. 360±83 HU] (P<0.01). The image quality of the 2 groups met the requirement of clinical diagnosis (4.97±0.18 vs. 4.94±0.25). No significant difference was found in subjective evaluation (P>0.05). In Group A compared with Group B, the following reductions were observed: CTDIvol (10.7%; 100.8 vs. 112.9 mGy), DLP (23.0%; 1,613±0 vs. 2,093±88 mGy·cm), and ED (23.0%; 5.00±0.00 vs. 6.49±0.27 mSv).ConclusionsCTA-DF-CTP data provide diagnostic accuracy and image quality similar to those of conventional CTA of head and neck CTA.
| S-EPMC10585561 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In this study we compared the image quality of a synchrotron radiation (SR) breast computed tomography (BCT) system with a clinical BCT in terms of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), noise power spectrum (NPS), spatial resolution and detail visibility. A breast phantom consisting of several slabs of breast-adipose equivalent material with different embedded targets (i.e., masses, fibers and calcifications) was used. Phantom images were acquired using a dedicated BCT system installed at the Radboud University Medical Center (Nijmegen, The Netherlands) and the SR BCT system at the SYRMEP beamline of Elettra SR facility (Trieste, Italy) based on a photon-counting detector. Images with the SR setup were acquired mimicking the clinical BCT conditions (i.e., energy of 30 keV and radiation dose of 6.5 mGy). Images were reconstructed with an isotropic cubic voxel of 273 µm for the clinical BCT, while for the SR setup two phase-retrieval (PhR) kernels (referred to as "smooth" and "sharp") were alternatively applied to each projection before tomographic reconstruction, with voxel size of 57 × 57 × 50 µm3. The CNR for the clinical BCT system can be up to 2-times higher than SR system, while the SNR can be 3-times lower than SR system, when the smooth PhR is used. The peak frequency of the NPS for the SR BCT is 2 to 4-times higher (0.9 mm-1 and 1.4 mm-1 with smooth and sharp PhR, respectively) than the clinical BCT (0.4 mm-1). The spatial resolution (MTF10%) was estimated to be 1.3 lp/mm for the clinical BCT, and 5.0 lp/mm and 6.7 lp/mm for the SR BCT with the smooth and sharp PhR, respectively. The smallest fiber visible in the SR BCT has a diameter of 0.15 mm, while for the clinical BCT is 0.41 mm. Calcification clusters with diameter of 0.13 mm are visible in the SR BCT, while the smallest diameter for the clinical BCT is 0.29 mm. As expected, the image quality of the SR BCT outperforms the clinical BCT system, providing images with higher spatial resolution and SNR, and with finer granularity. Nevertheless, this study assesses the image quality gap quantitatively, giving indications on the benefits associated with SR BCT and providing a benchmarking basis for its clinical implementation. In addition, SR-based studies can provide a gold-standard in terms of achievable image quality, constituting an upper-limit to the potential clinical development of a given technique.
| S-EPMC6882794 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesThis study was conducted in order to compare the effect of field of view (FOV) size on image quality between ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT) and conventional high-resolution CT (HRCT).MethodsEleven cadaveric lungs were scanned with U-HRCT and conventional HRCT and reconstructed with five FOVs (40, 80, 160, 240, and 320 mm). Three radiologists evaluated and scored the images. Three image evaluations were performed, comparing the image quality with the five FOVs with respect to the 160-mm FOV. The first evaluation was performed on conventional HRCT images, and the second evaluation on U-HRCT images. Images were scored on normal structure, abnormal findings, and overall image quality. The third evaluation was a comparison of the images obtained with conventional HRCT and U-HRCT, with scoring performed on overall image quality. Quantitative evaluation of noise was performed by setting ROIs.ResultsIn conventional HRCT, image quality was improved when the FOV was reduced to 160 mm. In U-HRCT, image quality, except for noise, improved when the FOV was reduced to 80 mm. In the third evaluation, overall image quality was improved in U-HRCT over conventional HRCT at all FOVs. Noise of U-HRCT increased with respect to conventional HRCT when the FOV was reduced from 160 to 40 mm. However, at 240- and 320-mm FOVs, the noise of U-HRCT and conventional HRCT showed no differences.ConclusionsIn conventional HRCT, image quality did not improve when the FOV was reduced below 160 mm. However, in U-HRCT, image quality improved even when the FOV was reduced to 80 mm.Key points• Reducing the size of the field of view to 160 mm improves diagnostic imaging quality in high-resolution CT. • In ultra-high-resolution CT, improvements in image quality can be obtained by reducing the size of the field of view to 80 mm. • Ultra-high-resolution CT produces images of higher quality compared with conventional HRCT irrespective of the size of the field of view.
| S-EPMC7248011 | biostudies-literature
Project description:One of the major challenges of lung cancer radiation therapy is how to reduce the margin of treatment field but also manage geometric uncertainty from respiratory motion. To this end, 4D-CT imaging has been widely used for treatment planning by providing a full range of respiratory motion for both tumor and normal structures. However, due to the considerable radiation dose and the limit of resource and time, typically only a free-breathing 3D-CT image is acquired on the treatment day for image-guided patient setup, which is often determined by the image fusion of the free-breathing treatment and planning day 3D-CT images. Since individual slices of two free breathing 3D-CTs are possibly acquired at different phases, two 3D-CTs often look different, which makes the image registration very challenging. This uncertainty of pretreatment patient setup requires a generous margin of radiation field in order to cover the tumor sufficiently during the treatment. In order to solve this problem, our main idea is to reconstruct the 4D-CT (with full range of tumor motion) from a single free-breathing 3D-CT acquired on the treatment day.We first build a super-resolution 4D-CT model from a low-resolution 4D-CT on the planning day, with the temporal correspondences also established across respiratory phases. Next, we propose a 4D-to-3D image registration method to warp the 4D-CT model to the treatment day 3D-CT while also accommodating the new motion detected on the treatment day 3D-CT. In this way, we can more precisely localize the moving tumor on the treatment day. Specifically, since the free-breathing 3D-CT is actually the mixed-phase image where different slices are often acquired at different respiratory phases, we first determine the optimal phase for each local image patch in the free-breathing 3D-CT to obtain a sequence of partial 3D-CT images (with incomplete image data at each phase) for the treatment day. Then we reconstruct a new 4D-CT for the treatment day by registering the 4D-CT of the planning day (with complete information) to the sequence of partial 3D-CT images of the treatment day, under the guidance of the 4D-CT model built on the planning day.We first evaluated the accuracy of our 4D-CT model on a set of lung 4D-CT images with manually labeled landmarks, where the maximum error in respiratory motion estimation can be reduced from 6.08 mm by diffeomorphic Demons to 3.67 mm by our method. Next, we evaluated our proposed 4D-CT reconstruction algorithm on both simulated and real free-breathing images. The reconstructed 4D-CT using our algorithm shows clinically acceptable accuracy and could be used to guide a more accurate patient setup than the conventional method.We have proposed a novel two-step method to reconstruct a new 4D-CT from a single free-breathing 3D-CT on the treatment day. Promising reconstruction results imply the possible application of this new algorithm in the image guided radiation therapy of lung cancer.
| S-EPMC3528792 | biostudies-other
Project description:PurposePoint-of-care imaging with mobile CT scanners offers several advantages, provided that the image quality is satisfactory. Our aim was to compare image quality of a novel mobile CT to stationary scanners for patients in a neurosurgical intensive care unit (ICU).MethodsFrom November 2020 to April 2021, all patients above 18 years of age examined by a mobile CT scanner at a neurosurgical ICU were included if they also had a stationary head CT examination during the same hospitalization. Quantitative image quality parameters included attenuation and noise in six predefined regions of interest, as well as contrast-to-noise ratio between gray and white matter. Subjective image quality was rated on a 4-garde scale, by four radiologists blinded to scanner parameters.ResultsFifty patients were included in the final study population. Radiation dose and image attenuation values were similar for mobCT and stationary CTs. There was a small statistically significant difference in subjective quality rating between mobCT and stationary CT images. Two radiologists favored the stationary CT images, one was neutral, and one favored mobCT images. For overall image quality, 14% of mobCT images were rated grade 1 (poor image quality) compared to 8% for stationary CT images.ConclusionPoint-of-care brain CT imaging was successfully performed on clinical neurosurgical ICU patients with small reduction in image quality, predominantly affecting the posterior fossa, compared to high-end stationary CT scanners.
| S-EPMC9905188 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesFeasibility evaluation of the One-Step Stroke Protocol, which is an interleaved cerebral computed tomography perfusion (CTP) and neck volumetric computed tomography angiography (vCTA) scanning technique using wide-detector computed tomography, and to assess the image quality of vCTA.MethodsTwenty patients with suspicion of acute ischaemic stroke were prospectively scanned and evaluated with a head and neck CTA and with the One-Step Stroke Protocol. Arterial enhancement and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the carotid arteries was assessed. Three observers scored artefacts and image quality of the cervical arteries. The total z-coverage was evaluated.ResultsMean enhancement in the carotid bifurcation was rated higher in the vCTA (595 ± 164 HU) than CTA (441 ± 117 HU). CNR was rated higher in vCTA. Image quality scores showed no significant difference in the region of the carotid bifurcation between vCTA and CTA. Lower neck image quality scores were slightly lower for vCTA due to artefacts, although not rated as diagnostically relevant. In ten patients, the origin of the left common carotid artery was missed by 1.6 ± 0.8 cm. Mean patient height was 1.8 ± 0.09 m. Carotid bifurcation and origin of vertebral arteries were covered in all patients.ConclusionsThe One-Step Stroke Protocol is feasible with good diagnostic image quality of vCTA, although full z-coverage is limited in tall patients.Key points• Interleaving cerebral CTP with neck CTA (One-Step Stroke Protocol) is feasible • Diagnostic quality of One-Step Stroke Protocol neck CTA is similar to conventional CTA • One-Step Stroke Protocol neck CTA suffers from streak artefacts in the lower neck • A limitation of One-Step Stroke Protocol CTA is lack of coverage in tall patients • Precise planning of One-Step Stroke Protocol neck CTA is necessary in tall patients.
| S-EPMC5408041 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Respiratory monitoring systems are required to supply CT scanners with information on the patient's breathing during the acquisition of a respiration-correlated computer tomography (RCCT), also referred to as 4D CT. The information a respiratory monitoring system has to provide to the CT scanner depends on the specific scanner. The purpose of this study is to compare two different respiratory monitoring systems (Anzai Respiratory Gating System; C-RAD Sentinel) with respect to their applicability in combination with an Aquilion Large Bore CT scanner from Toshiba. The scanner used in our clinic does not make use of the full time dependent breathing signal, but only single trigger pulses indicating the beginning of a new breathing cycle. Hence the attached respiratory monitoring system is expected to deliver accurate online trigger pulse for each breathing cycle. The accuracy of the trigger pulses sent to the CT scanner has to be ensured by the selected respiratory monitoring system. Since a trigger pulse (output signal) of a respiratory monitoring system is a function of the measured breathing signal (input signal), the typical clinical range of the input signal is estimated for both examined respiratory monitoring systems. Both systems are analyzed based on the following parameters: time resolution, signal amplitude, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), signal linearity, trigger compatibility, and clinical examples. The Anzai system shows a better SNR (≥ 28 dB) than the Sentinel system (≥ 14.6 dB). In terms of compatibility with the cycle-based image sorting algorithm of the Toshiba CT scanner, the Anzai system benefits from the possibility to generate cycle-based triggers, whereas the Sentinel system is only able to generate amplitude-based triggers. In clinical practice, the combination of a Toshiba CT scanner and the Anzai system will provide better results due to the compatibility of the image sorting and trigger release methods.
| S-EPMC5690076 | biostudies-literature
Project description:OBJECTIVES:To compare the image quality of the lungs between ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT) and conventional area detector CT (AD-CT) images. METHODS:Image data of slit phantoms (0.35, 0.30, and 0.15 mm) and 11 cadaveric human lungs were acquired by both U-HRCT and AD-CT devices. U-HRCT images were obtained with three acquisition modes: normal mode (U-HRCTN: 896 channels, 0.5 mm × 80 rows; 512 matrix), super-high-resolution mode (U-HRCTSHR: 1792 channels, 0.25 mm × 160 rows; 1024 matrix), and volume mode (U-HRCTSHR-VOL: non-helical acquisition with U-HRCTSHR). AD-CT images were obtained with the same conditions as U-HRCTN. Three independent observers scored normal anatomical structures (vessels and bronchi), abnormal CT findings (faint nodules, solid nodules, ground-glass opacity, consolidation, emphysema, interlobular septal thickening, intralobular reticular opacities, bronchovascular bundle thickening, bronchiectasis, and honeycombing), noise, artifacts, and overall image quality on a 3-point scale (1 = worst, 2 = equal, 3 = best) compared with U-HRCTN. Noise values were calculated quantitatively. RESULTS:U-HRCT could depict a 0.15-mm slit. Both U-HRCTSHR and U-HRCTSHR-VOL significantly improved visualization of normal anatomical structures and abnormal CT findings, except for intralobular reticular opacities and reduced artifacts, compared with AD-CT (p < 0.014). Visually, U-HRCTSHR-VOL has less noise than U-HRCTSHR and AD-CT (p < 0.00001). Quantitative noise values were significantly higher in the following order: U-HRCTSHR (mean, 30.41), U-HRCTSHR-VOL (26.84), AD-CT (16.03), and U-HRCTN (15.14) (p < 0.0001). U-HRCTSHR and U-HRCTSHR-VOL resulted in significantly higher overall image quality than AD-CT and were almost equal to U-HRCTN (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS:Both U-HRCTSHR and U-HRCTSHR-VOL can provide higher image quality than AD-CT, while U-HRCTSHR-VOL was less noisy than U-HRCTSHR. KEY POINTS:• Ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT) can improve spatial resolution. • U-HRCT can reduce streak and dark band artifacts. • U-HRCT can provide higher image quality than conventional area detector CT. • In U-HRCT, the volume mode is less noisy than the super-high-resolution mode. • U-HRCT may provide more detailed information about the lung anatomy and pathology.
| S-EPMC6223853 | biostudies-literature