Dataset Information

Inter-Rater Reliability of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Assessment on Wide-Field OCT-Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To assess inter-rater reliability in the detection of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) changes using wide-field optical coherence tomography angiography (WF-OCTA) versus fluorescein angiography (FA).

Methods

This retrospective, cross-sectional study included patients with severe nonproliferative and PDR. Images were acquired with 12 × 12 mm WF-OCTA and FA with a 55° lens. Images were cropped to represent the exact same field of view. Qualitative (detection of neovascularization at the disc [NVD] and elsewhere [NVE], enlarged foveal avascular zone [FAZ], vitreous hemorrhage [VH]) and quantitative analyses (FAZ area, horizontal, vertical, and maximum FAZ diameter) were performed by 2 masked graders using ImageJ. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using unweighted Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) for qualitative analyses and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for quantitative analyses.

Results

Twenty-three eyes of 17 patients were included. Inter-rater reliability was higher for FA than for WF-OCTA in qualitative analyses: κ values were 0.65 and 0.78 for detection of extended FAZ, 0.83 and 1.0 for NVD, 0.78 and 1.0 for NVE, and 0.19 and 1 for VH for WF-OCTA and FA, respectively. In contrast, inter-rater reliability was higher for WF-OCTA than for FA in the quantitative analyses: ICC values were 0.94 and 0.76 for FAZ size, 0.92 and 0.79 for horizontal FAZ diameter, 0.82 and 0.72 for vertical FAZ diameter, and 0.88 and 0.82 for maximum FAZ diameter on WF-OCTA and FA, respectively.

Conclusions

Inter-rater reliability of FA is superior to WF-OCTA for qualitative analyses whereas inter-rater reliability of WF-OCTA is superior to FA for quantitative analyses.

Translational relevance

The study highlights the specific merits of both imaging modalities in terms of reliability. FA should be preferred for qualitative parameters, whereas WF-OCTA should be preferred for quantitative parameters.

SUBMITTER: Shah PN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10351024 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Inter-Rater Reliability of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Assessment on Wide-Field OCT-Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography.

Shah Payal N PN Mishra Divyansh K DK Falahat Peyman P Fischer Lars L Guzman Gabriela G Terheyden Jan H JH Holz Frank G FG Krohne Tim U TU Finger Robert P RP Wintergerst Maximilian W M MWM

Translational vision science & technology 20230701 7

<h4>Purpose</h4>To assess inter-rater reliability in the detection of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) changes using wide-field optical coherence tomography angiography (WF-OCTA) versus fluorescein angiography (FA).<h4>Methods</h4>This retrospective, cross-sectional study included patients with severe nonproliferative and PDR. Images were acquired with 12 × 12 mm WF-OCTA and FA with a 55° lens. Images were cropped to represent the exact same field of view. Qualitative (detection of neova ...[more]

PMID: 37432848

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionThere is a high and ever-increasing global prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and invasive imaging techniques are often required to confirm the presence of proliferative disease. The aim of this study was to explore the images of a rapid and non-invasive technique, widefield optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A), to study differences between patients with severe non-proliferative and proliferative DR (PDR).MethodsWe conducted an observational longitudinal study from November 2022 to March 2023. We recruited 75 patients who were classified into a proliferative group (28 patients) and severe non-proliferative group (47 patients). Classification was done by specialist clinicians who had full access to any multimodal imaging they required to be confident of their diagnosis, including fluorescein angiography. For all patients, we performed single-shot 4 × 4 and 10 × 10 mm (widefield) OCT-A imaging and when possible, the multiple images required for mosaic 17.5 × 17.5 mm (ultra widefield) OCT-A imaging. We assessed the frequency with which proliferative disease was identifiable solely from these OCT-A images and used custom-built MATLAB software to analyze the images and determine computerized metrics such as density and intensity of vessels, foveal avascular zone, and ischemic areas.ResultsOn clinically assessing the OCT-A 10 × 10 fields, we were only able to detect new vessels in 25% of known proliferative images. Using ultra-widefield mosaic images, however, we were able to detect new vessels in 100% of PDR patients. The image analysis metrics of 4 × 4 and 10 × 10 mm images did not show any significant differences between the two clinical groups. For mosaics, however, there were significant differences in the capillary density in patients with PDR compared to severe non-PDR (9.1% ± 1.9 in the PDR group versus 11.0% ± 1.9 for severe group). We also found with mosaics a significant difference in the metrics of ischemic areas; average area of ischemic zones (253,930.1 ± 108,636 for the proliferative group versus 149,104.2 ± 55,101.8 for the severe group.ConclusionsOur study showed a high sensitivity for detecting PDR using only ultra-widefield mosaic OCT-A imaging, compared to multimodal including fluorescein angiography imaging. It also suggests that image analysis of aspects such as ischemia levels may be useful in identifying higher risk groups as a warning sign for future conversion to neovascularization.

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning (ML) techniques applied to radiomic features extracted from OCT and OCT angiography (OCTA) images for diabetes mellitus (DM), diabetic retinopathy (DR), and referable DR (R-DR) diagnosis.DesignCross-sectional analysis of a retinal image dataset from a previous prospective OCTA study (ClinicalTrials.govNCT03422965).ParticipantsPatients with type 1 DM and controls included in the progenitor study.MethodsRadiomic features were extracted from fundus retinographies, OCT, and OCTA images in each study eye. Logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, support vector classifier (SVC)-linear, SVC-radial basis function, and random forest models were created to evaluate their diagnostic accuracy for DM, DR, and R-DR diagnosis in all image types.Main outcome measuresArea under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) mean and standard deviation for each ML model and each individual and combined image types.ResultsA dataset of 726 eyes (439 individuals) were included. For DM diagnosis, the greatest AUC was observed for OCT (0.82, 0.03). For DR detection, the greatest AUC was observed for OCTA (0.77, 0.03), especially in the 3 × 3 mm superficial capillary plexus OCTA scan (0.76, 0.04). For R-DR diagnosis, the greatest AUC was observed for OCTA (0.87, 0.12) and the deep capillary plexus OCTA scan (0.86, 0.08). The addition of clinical variables (age, sex, etc.) improved most models AUC for DM, DR and R-DR diagnosis. The performance of the models was similar in unilateral and bilateral eyes image datasets.ConclusionsRadiomics extracted from OCT and OCTA images allow identification of patients with DM, DR, and R-DR using standard ML classifiers. OCT was the best test for DM diagnosis, OCTA for DR and R-DR diagnosis and the addition of clinical variables improved most models. This pioneer study demonstrates that radiomics-based ML techniques applied to OCT and OCTA images may be an option for DR screening in patients with type 1 DM.Financial disclosuresProprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Project description:To investigate the distribution of clinically significant nonperfusion areas (NPAs) on widefield OCT angiography (OCTA) images in patients with diabetes. Prospective, cross-sectional, observational study. One hundred and forty-four eyes of 114 patients with diabetes. Nominal 20 × 23 mm OCTA images were obtained using a swept-source OCTA device (Xephilio OCT-S1), followed by the creation of en face images 20-mm (1614 pixels) in diameter centering on the fovea. The nonperfusion squares (NPSs) were defined as the 10 × 10 pixel squares without retinal vessels, and the ratio of eyes with the NPSs to all eyes in each square was referred to as the NPS ratio. The areas with probabilistic differences (APD) for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) (APD[PDR] and APD[NPDR]) were defined as sets of squares with higher NPS ratios in eyes with PDR and NPDR, respectively. The P ratio (NPSs within APD[PDR] but not APD[NPDR]/all NPSs) was also calculated. The probabilistic distribution of the NPSs and the association with diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity. The NPSs developed randomly in eyes with mild and moderate NPDR and were more prevalent in the extramacular areas and the temporal quadrant in eyes with severe NPDR and PDR. The APD(PDR) was distributed mainly in the extramacular areas, sparing the areas around the vascular arcades and radially peripapillary capillaries. The APD(PDR) contained retinal neovascularization more frequently than the non-APD(PDR) (P = 0.023). The P ratio was higher in eyes with PDR than in those with NPDR (P < 0.001). The multivariate analysis designated the P ratio (odds ratio, 8.293 × 107; 95% confidence interval, 6.529 × 102-1.053 × 1013; P = 0.002) and the total NPSs (odds ratio, 1.002; 95% confidence interval, 1.001-1.003; P < 0.001) as independent risk factors of PDR. Most eyes with NPDR and 4-2-1 rule findings of DR severity had higher P ratios but not necessarily greater NPS numbers. The APD(PDR) is uniquely distributed on widefield OCTA images, and the NPA location patterns are associated with DR severity, independent of the entire area of NPAs. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Project description:PurposeTo study the wider field swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (WF SS-OCTA) metrics, especially non-perfusion area (NPA), in the diagnosing and staging of DR.DesignCross-sectional observational study (November 2018-September 2020).Participants473 eyes of 286 patients (69 eyes of 49 control patients and 404 eyes of 237 diabetic patients).MethodsWe imaged using 6mm×6mm and 12mm×12mm angiograms on WF SS-OCTA. Images were analyzed using the ARI Network and FIJI ImageJ. Mixed effects multiple regression models and receiver operator characteristic analysis was used for statistical analyses.Main outcome measuresQuantitative metrics such as vessel density (VD); vessel skeletonized density (VSD); foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, circularity, and perimeter; and NPA in DR and their relative performance for its diagnosis and grading.ResultsAmong patients with diabetes (median age 59 years), 51 eyes had no DR, 185 eyes (88 mild, 97 moderate-severe) had non-proliferative DR (NPDR); and 168 eyes had proliferative DR (PDR). Trend analysis revealed a progressive decline in superficial capillary plexus (SCP) VD and VSD, and increased NPA with increasing DR severity. Additionally, there was a significant reduction in deep capillary plexus (DCP) VD and VSD in early DR (mild NPDR), but the progressive reduction in advanced DR stages was not significant. NPA was the best parameter to diagnose DR (AUC:0.96), whereas all parameters combined on both angiograms efficiently diagnosed (AUC:0.97) and differentiated between DR stages (AUC range:0.83-0.97). The presence of diabetic macular edema was associated with reduced SCP and DCP VD and VSD within mild NPDR eyes, whereas an increased VD and VSD in SCP among moderate-severe NPDR group.ConclusionsOur work highlights the importance of NPA, which can be more readily and easily measured with WF SS-OCTA compared to fluorescein angiography. It is additionally quick and non-invasive, and hence can be an important adjunct for DR diagnosis and management. In our study, a combination of all OCTA metrics on both 6mm×6mm and 12mm×12mm angiograms had the best diagnostic accuracy for DR and its severity. Further longitudinal studies are needed to assess NPA as a biomarker for progression or regression of DR severity.

Dataset Information

Inter-Rater Reliability of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Assessment on Wide-Field OCT-Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography.

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Translational relevance

Publications

Inter-Rater Reliability of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Assessment on Wide-Field OCT-Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets