Dataset Information

Barrier films for the prevention of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Radiation dermatitis (RD) is the most common side effect of adjuvant whole-breast or chest wall irradiation, majorly impacting quality of life in numerous patients. The use of barrier films (polyurethane dressings such as Hydrofilm® and Mepitel® film remaining on the skin for the duration of the radiation treatment) has been investigated as a prophylactic measure in several prospective trials. Here, we critically appraise the available evidence behind preventive barrier film application in the context of breast cancer treatment.

Methods

International literature was reviewed and high-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this meta-analysis.

Results

The results of 5 RCTs (663 patients; >90% Caucasian) were analysed. Overall, barrier films lead to improved clinician- and patient-reported outcomes: fewer grade ≥2 RD (11% vs. 42%; OR = 0.16; p < 0.001) and moist desquamation (2% vs. 16%; OR = 0.12; p = 0.006), as well as less patient-reported pain (standardised mean difference [SMD] -0.51; p < 0.001), itching (SMD -0.52; p = 0.001), burning (SMD -0.41; p = 0.011), and limitations in daily activities (SMD -0.20; p = 0.007). Furthermore, barrier films have a high acceptance rate among patients, as well as a favourable cost-benefit ratio. Possible side effects due to its application are mild and mostly self-limiting. Overall, there was a lack of information on the radiation treatment techniques used.

Conclusion

The evidence presented in this meta-analysis suggests that barrier films are an excellent tool in the prevention of RD among Caucasian patients receiving whole-breast or chest wall irradiation. Its use should therefore be considered routinely in these patients.

SUBMITTER: Dejonckheere CS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10404536 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Barrier films for the prevention of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Dejonckheere Cas Stefaan CS Dejonckheere Egon E Layer Julian Philipp JP Layer Katharina K Sarria Gustavo Renato GR Koch David D Abramian Alina A Kaiser Christina C Lindner Kira K Bachmann Anne A Anzböck Teresa T Röhner Fred F Schmeel Frederic Carsten FC Schmeel Leonard Christopher LC

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 20230705

<h4>Purpose</h4>Radiation dermatitis (RD) is the most common side effect of adjuvant whole-breast or chest wall irradiation, majorly impacting quality of life in numerous patients. The use of barrier films (polyurethane dressings such as Hydrofilm® and Mepitel® film remaining on the skin for the duration of the radiation treatment) has been investigated as a prophylactic measure in several prospective trials. Here, we critically appraise the available evidence behind preventive barrier film appl ...[more]

PMID: 37473629

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Aloe vera were frequently reported to reduce the risk of radiation-induced dermatitis (RID), but the quantitative results from all the relevant studies were not presently available. This study sought to conduct a cumulative analysis to better clarify the preventive effects of aloe vera in RID. Methods: MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wan Fang Database were utilized for identifying the eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) without language restrictions, up to March 2022. The pooled incidence of RID was conducted by the Relative risk (RR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) through the STATA software under a random-effects model. This systematic review and cumulative analysis were registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022335188). Results: Fourteen RCTs met our predefined inclusion criteria, enrolling 1,572 participants (mean age: 46.5-56 years). The cumulative results revealed that patients pretreated with aloe vera were associated with a significantly lower risk of RID compared to those without aloe vera usage (RR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.67-0.88, p < 0.001; heterogeneity: I 2 = 79.8%, p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, the pooled incidence of Grade 2-4, Grade 2, and Grade 3 RID was also dramatically lower in the group of aloe vera as compared to the placebo group [RR = 0.44 (0.27, 0.74), 0.58 (0.36, 0.94), and 0.27 (0.12, 0.59) in Grade 2-4, Grade 2, and Grade 3, respectively]. However, in regard to Grade 4 RID, the combined RR indicated that the incidence of RID was comparable between aloe vera and the control group (RR = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-1.01, p = 0.051; heterogeneity: I 2 = 0.0%, p = 0.741). The sensitivity analyses showed that there was no substantial change in the new pooled RR after eliminating anyone of the included study. Conclusion: The current cumulative analysis revealed that patients pretreated with aloe vera were less likely to suffer from RID than the controls without using aloe vera. Based on this finding, the prophylactic application of aloe vera might significantly reduce the incidence of RID, especially in Grade 2 and Grade 3 RID. Further large-sample multicenter RCTs are still warranted to confirm these findings and for better clinical application.

Project description:BackgroundRadiation-induced skin reaction (RISR) is a common side effect that affects the majority of cancer patients receiving radiation treatment. RISR is often characterised by swelling, redness, pigmentation, fibrosis, and ulceration, pain, warmth, burning, and itching of the skin. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effects of interventions which aim to prevent or manage RISR in people with cancer.MethodsWe searched the following databases up to November 2012: Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL (2012, Issue 11), MEDLINE (from 1946), EMBASE (from 1974), PsycINFO (from 1806), CINAHL (from 1981) and LILACS (from 1982). Randomized controlled trials evaluating interventions for preventing or managing RISR in cancer patients were included. The primary outcomes were development of RISR, and levels of RISR and symptom severity. Secondary outcomes were time taken to develop erythema or dry desquamation; quality of life; time taken to heal, a number of skin reaction and symptom severity measures; cost, participant satisfaction; ease of use and adverse effects. Where appropriate, we pooled results of randomized controlled trials using mean differences (MD) or odd ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).ResultsForty-seven studies were included in this review. These evaluated six types of interventions (oral systemic medications; skin care practices; steroidal topical therapies; non-steroidal topical therapies; dressings and other). Findings from two meta-analyses demonstrated significant benefits of oral Wobe-Mugos E for preventing RISR (OR 0.13 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.38)) and limiting the maximal level of RISR (MD -0.92 (95% CI -1.36 to -0.48)). Another meta-analysis reported that wearing deodorant does not influence the development of RISR (OR 0.80 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.37)).ConclusionsDespite the high number of trials in this area, there is limited good, comparative research that provides definitive results suggesting the effectiveness of any single intervention for reducing RISR. More research is required to demonstrate the usefulness of a wide range of products that are being used for reducing RISR. Future efforts for reducing RISR severity should focus on promising interventions, such as Wobe-Mugos E and oral zinc.

Dataset Information

Barrier films for the prevention of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Barrier films for the prevention of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets