Dataset Information

Effect of stage shift and immunotherapy treatment on lung cancer survival outcomes.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Non-small-cell lung cancer mortality has declined at a faster rate than incidence due to multiple factors, including changes in smoking behaviour, early detection which shifts diagnosis, and novel therapies. Limited resources require that we quantify the contribution of early detection versus novel therapies in improving lung cancer survival outcomes.

Methods

Non-small-cell lung cancer patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data were queried and divided into: (i) stage IV diagnosed in 2015 (n = 3774) and (ii) stage I-III diagnosed in 2010-2012 (n = 15 817). Multivariable Cox-proportional hazards models were performed to assess the independent association of immunotherapy or diagnosis at stage I/II versus III with survival.

Results

Patients treated with immunotherapy had significantly better survival than those who did not (HRadj: 0.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.56), as did those diagnosed at stage I/II versus stage III (HRadj: 0.36, 95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.37). Patients on immunotherapy had a 10.7-month longer survival than those who were not. Stage I/II patients had an average survival benefit of 34 months, compared to stage III. If 25%% of stage IV patients not on immunotherapy received it, there would be a gain of 22 292 person-years survival per 100 000 diagnoses. A switch of only 25% from stage III to stage I/II would correspond to 70 833 person-years survival per 100 000 diagnoses.

Conclusions

In this cohort study, earlier stage at diagnosis contributed to life expectancy by almost 3 years, while gains from immunotherapy would contribute ½ year of survival. Given the relative affordability of early detection, risk reduction through increased screening should be optimized.

SUBMITTER: Patel P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10412408 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effect of stage shift and immunotherapy treatment on lung cancer survival outcomes.

Patel Parth P Flores Raja R Alpert Naomi N Pyenson Bruce B Taioli Emanuela E

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery 20230801 2

<h4>Objectives</h4>Non-small-cell lung cancer mortality has declined at a faster rate than incidence due to multiple factors, including changes in smoking behaviour, early detection which shifts diagnosis, and novel therapies. Limited resources require that we quantify the contribution of early detection versus novel therapies in improving lung cancer survival outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>Non-small-cell lung cancer patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data were quer ...[more]

PMID: 37285318

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represents a breakthrough in the current landscape for the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), but the real-world outcome is limited. This study aimed to investigate the treatment options and efficacy evaluation of first-line, second-line, and subsequent-line immunotherapy in routine practice.MethodsA retrospective analysis of ES-SCLC patients treated with ICIs was conducted between May 2016 and September 2021. Objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were assessed between groups to explore the value of ICIs at different treatment time periods. PFS1 and PFS2 were defined as the duration from initial therapy to disease progression or death in first-line or second-line treatment.ResultsNinety-six patients with ES-SCLC were included. PFS1 was prolonged in patients treated with first-line ICIs-combined therapy (median PFS1 7.20 months vs. 5.30 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-087, p = 0.0085). For patients who progressed after first-line ICIs treatment (N = 22), PFS1 + PFS2 was longer in the second-line ICIs continuation group with no significant difference (median PFS1 + PFS2 11.27 months vs. 7.20 months, HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.14-1.51, p = 0.19). For patients who experienced a progression event after first-line chemotherapy (N = 50), PFS2 and PFS1 + PFS2 were prolonged in patients who accepted second-line ICIs-combined therapy without significant difference (median PFS2 4.00 months vs. 2.43 months, HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.33-1.05, p = 0.070; median PFS1 + PFS2 11.30 months vs. 8.70 months, HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.98, p = 0.056).ConclusionFirst-line ICIs plus chemotherapy should be applied in the clinical practice of ES-SCLC. If patients did not receive ICIs plus chemotherapy in first-line treatment, therapies that include ICIs in second-line treatment should be considered.

Project description:ObjectiveTo determine the effect of the introduction of low dose computed tomography screening in 2013 on lung cancer stage shift, survival, and disparities in the stage of lung cancer diagnosed in the United States.DesignQuasi-experimental study using Joinpoint modeling, multivariable ordinal logistic regression, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling.SettingUS National Cancer Database and Surveillance Epidemiology End Results program database.ParticipantsPatients aged 45-80 years diagnosed as having non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2018.Main outcome measuresAnnual per cent change in percentage of stage I NSCLC diagnosed among patients aged 45-54 (ineligible for screening) and 55-80 (potentially eligible for screening), median all cause survival, and incidence of NSCLC; multivariable adjusted odds ratios for year-to-year changes in likelihood of having earlier stages of disease at diagnosis and multivariable adjusted hazard ratios for changes in hazard of death before versus after introduction of screening.ResultsThe percentage of stage I NSCLC diagnosed among patients aged 55-80 did not significantly increase from 2010 to 2013 (from 27.8% to 29.4%) and then increased at 3.9% (95% confidence interval 3.0% to 4.8%) per year from 2014 to 2018 (from 30.2% to 35.5%). In multivariable adjusted analysis, the increase in the odds per year of a patient having one lung cancer stage lower at diagnosis during the time period from 2014 to 2018 was 6.2% (multivariable adjusted odds ratio 1.062, 95% confidence interval 1.048 to 1.077; P<0.001) higher than the increase in the odds per year from 2010 to 2013. Similarly, the median all cause survival of patients aged 55-80 did not significantly increase from 2010 to 2013 (from 15.8 to 18.1 months), and then increased at 11.9% (8.9% to 15.0%) per year from 2014 to 2018 (from 19.7 to 28.2 months). In multivariable adjusted analysis, the hazard of death decreased significantly faster after 2014 compared with before 2014 (P<0.001). By 2018, stage I NSCLC was the predominant diagnosis among non-Hispanic white people and people living in the highest income or best educated regions. Non-white people and those living in lower income or less educated regions remained more likely to have stage IV disease at diagnosis. Increases in the detection of early stage disease in the US from 2014 to 2018 led to an estimated 10 100 averted deaths.ConclusionsA recent stage shift toward stage I NSCLC coincides with improved survival and the introduction of lung cancer screening. Non-white patients and those living in areas of greater deprivation had lower rates of stage I disease identified, highlighting the need for efforts to increase access to screening in the US.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Preclinical studies suggest enhanced anti-tumor activity with combined radioimmunotherapy. We hypothesized that radiation (RT)?+?immunotherapy would associate with improved overall survival (OS) compared to immunotherapy or chemotherapy alone for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS:The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with stage IV NSCLC receiving chemotherapy or immunotherapy from 2013 to 2014. RT modality was classified as stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) to intra- and/or extracranial sites or non-SRT external beam RT (EBRT). OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS:In total, 44,498 patients were included (13% immunotherapy, 46.8% EBRT, and 4.7% SRT). On multivariate analysis, immunotherapy (hazard ratio [HR]:0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]:0.78-0.83) and SRT (HR:0.78, 95%CI:0.70-0.78) independently associated with improved OS; however, the interaction term for SRT?+?immunotherapy was insignificant (p?=?0.89). For immunotherapy patients, the median OS for no RT, EBRT, and SRT was 14.5, 10.9, and 18.2?months, respectively (p?< 0.0001), and EBRT (HR:1.37, 95%CI:1.29-1.46) and SRT (HR:0.78, 95%CI:0.66-0.93) associated with OS on multivariate analysis. In the SRT subset, median OS for immunotherapy and chemotherapy was 18.2 and 14.3?months, respectively (p?=?0.004), with immunotherapy (HR:0.82, 95%CI:0.69-0.98) associating with OS on multivariate analysis. Furthermore, for patients receiving SRT, biologically effective dose (BED)?>?60?Gy was independently associated with improved OS (HR:0.79, 95%CI:0.70-0.90, p?< 0.0001) on multivariate analysis with a significant interaction between BED and systemic treatment (p?=?0.008). CONCLUSIONS:Treatment with SRT associated with improved OS for patients with metastatic NSCLC irrespective of systemic treatment. The high survival for patients receiving SRT?+?immunotherapy strongly argues for evaluation in randomized trials.

Dataset Information

Effect of stage shift and immunotherapy treatment on lung cancer survival outcomes.

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Effect of stage shift and immunotherapy treatment on lung cancer survival outcomes.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets