Dataset Information

Detection and Quantification of Klebsiella pneumoniae in Fecal Samples Using Digital Droplet PCR in Comparison with Real-Time PCR.

ABSTRACT: This study aimed to develop a rapid and sensitive droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay for the specific detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae in fecal samples, and to evaluate its application in the clinic by comparison with real-time PCR assay and conventional microbial culture. Specific primers and a probe targeting the K. pneumoniae hemolysin (khe) gene were designed. Thirteen other pathogens were used to evaluate the specificity of the primers and probe. A recombinant plasmid containing the khe gene was constructed and used to assess the sensitivity, repeatability, and reproducibility of the ddPCR. Clinical fecal samples (n = 103) were collected and tested by the ddPCR, real-time PCR, and conventional microbial culture methods. The detection limit of ddPCR for K. pneumoniae was 1.1 copies/μL, about a 10-fold increase in sensitivity compared with real-time PCR. The ddPCR was negative for the 13 pathogens other than K. pneumoniae, confirming its high specificity. Clinical fecal samples gave a higher rate of positivity in the K. pneumoniae ddPCR assay than in analysis by real-time PCR or conventional culture. ddPCR also showed less inhibition by the inhibitor in fecal sample than real-time PCR. Thus, we established a sensitive and effective ddPCR-based assay method for K. pneumoniae. It could be a useful tool for K. pneumoniae detection in feces and may serve as a reliable method to identify causal pathogens and help guide treatment decisions. IMPORTANCE Klebsiella pneumoniae can cause a range of illnesses and has a high colonization rate in the human gut, making it crucial to develop an efficient method for detecting K. pneumoniae in fecal samples.

SUBMITTER: Feng J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10433836 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Detection and Quantification of Klebsiella pneumoniae in Fecal Samples Using Digital Droplet PCR in Comparison with Real-Time PCR.

Feng Junxia J Cui Xiaohu X Du Bing B Zhao Hanqing H Feng Yanling Y Cui Jinghua J Yan Chao C Gan Lin L Fan Zheng Z Fu Tongtong T Xu Ziying Z Yu Zihui Z Zhang Rui R Du Shuheng S Tian Ziyan Z Zhang Qun Q Xue Guanhua G Yuan Jing J

Microbiology spectrum 20230612 4

This study aimed to develop a rapid and sensitive droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay for the specific detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae in fecal samples, and to evaluate its application in the clinic by comparison with real-time PCR assay and conventional microbial culture. Specific primers and a probe targeting the K. pneumoniae hemolysin (<i>khe</i>) gene were designed. Thirteen other pathogens were used to evaluate the specificity of the primers and probe. A recombinant plasmid containing the ...[more]

PMID: 37306605

Similar Datasets

Project description:Cell-associated (CA) HIV-1 RNA is considered a potential marker for assessment of viral reservoir dynamics and antiretroviral therapy (ART) response in HIV-infected patients. Recent studies employed sensitive seminested real-time quantitative (q)PCR to quantify CA HIV-1 RNA. Digital PCR has been recently described as an alternative PCR-based technique for absolute quantification with higher accuracy compared to qPCR. Here, a comparison was made between the droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and the seminested qPCR for quantification of unspliced (us) and multiply spliced (ms) CA HIV-1 RNA. Synthetic RNA standards and CA HIV-1 RNA from infected patients on and off ART (N = 34) were quantified with both methods. Correlations were observed between the methods both for serially diluted synthetic standards (usRNA: R2 = 0.97, msRNA: R2 = 0.92) and patient-derived samples (usRNA: R2 = 0.51, msRNA: R2 = 0.87). Seminested qPCR showed better quantitative linearity, accuracy and sensitivity in the quantification of synthetic standards than ddPCR, especially in the lower quantification ranges. Both methods demonstrated equally high detection rate of usRNA in patient samples on and off ART (91%), whereas ddPCR detected msRNA in larger proportion of samples from ART-treated patients (p = 0.13). We observed an average agreement between the methods for usRNA quantification in patient samples, albeit with a large standard deviation (bias = 0.05±0.75 log10). However, a bias of 0.94±0.36 log10 was observed for msRNA. No-template controls were consistently negative in the seminested qPCR, but yielded a positive ddPCR signal for some wells. Therefore, the false positive signals may have affected the detection power of ddPCR in this study. Digital PCR is promising for HIV nucleic acid quantification, but the false positive signals need further attention. Quantitative assays for CA HIV RNA have the potential to improve monitoring of patients on ART and to be used in clinical studies aimed at HIV eradication, but should be cross-validated by multiple laboratories prior to wider use.

Dataset Information

Detection and Quantification of Klebsiella pneumoniae in Fecal Samples Using Digital Droplet PCR in Comparison with Real-Time PCR.

Publications

Detection and Quantification of Klebsiella pneumoniae in Fecal Samples Using Digital Droplet PCR in Comparison with Real-Time PCR.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets