Dataset Information

Comparing the efficacy and safety of medications in adults with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common genetic heart disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of several medications and recommend better drug treatments for adults with HCM.

Methods

A review of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov and CNKI databases was conducted for studies on the efficacy and safety of drugs for adults with HCM. A frequentist random effects model was used in this network analysis.

Results

This network meta-analysis included 7 studies assessing seven medications, 6 studies evaluating monotherapy and 1 study evaluating combination therapy. Based on the network meta-analysis results, xiaoxinbi formula plus metoprolol (MD -56.50% [-72.43%, -40.57%]), metoprolol (MD -47.00% [-59.07%, -34.93%]) and mavacamten (MD -34.50% [-44.75%, -24.25%]) significantly reduced the resting left ventricular outflow tract gradient (LVOTG) in comparison with placebo. Resting LVOTG could also be reduced with N-acetylcysteine (NAC). The incidence of adverse drug reactions was not significantly different between the placebo group and the treatment group.

Conclusion

For adults with HCM, the top 4 treatments included xiaoxinbi formula plus metoprolol, metoprolol, mavacamten and NAC.Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=374222], identifier [CRD42022374222].

SUBMITTER: Mi K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10461399 | biostudies-literature | 2023

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparing the efficacy and safety of medications in adults with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Mi Keying K Wu Sijia S Lv Chanyuan C Meng Yongkang Y Yin Wenchao W Li Hongkai H Li Jiangbing J Yuan Haitao H

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine 20230814

<h4>Background</h4>Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common genetic heart disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of several medications and recommend better drug treatments for adults with HCM.<h4>Methods</h4>A review of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov and CNKI databases was conducted for studies on the efficacy and safety of drugs for adults with HCM. A frequentist random effects model was u ...[more]

PMID: 37645523

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundChinese classical prescriptions (CCPs) are commonly utilized in China as an adjuvant treatment for dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Nevertheless, there was insufficient systematic evidence data to show the advantages of CCPs plus current conventional therapy (CT) against DCM. This network meta-analysis (NMA) sought to evaluate and prioritize the six different CCP types' respective efficacies for DCM.MethodsA comprehensive search was conducted from the databases' inception to November 30, 2024, to extract RCTs that addressed the use of CCPs in conjunction with CT for DCM. The databases included PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science Periodical Database (CSPD), Chinese Citation Database (CCD), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and ClinicalTrials.gov. The Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included RCTs. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probability values was employed to rank the relative efficacy. Bayesian network meta-analysis was applied to evaluate the efficacy of various CCPs. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024586365).ResultsFollowing the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 27 eligible RCTs involving 2019 patients were included. The evaluated outcomes included clinical effectiveness rate (CER), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), cardiac output (CO), hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and six-min walk test (6MWT). According to the NMA, Zhigancao decoction (ZGCD), Zhenwu decoction (ZWD), Shenfu decoction (SFD), Shengmai powder (SMP), Yangxin decoction (YXD), and Buyang Huanwu decoction (BYHW) in addition to CT considerably enhanced DCM treatment outcomes when compared to CT alone. SMP + CT (MD = 12.75, 95%CI 8.28-17.22) showed the highest probability of being the best treatment on account of the enhancement of LVEF. SFD + CT was most likely to be the optimal intervention for LVEDD decrease (MD = -4.68, 95%CI -8.73 to -0.62). YXD + CT (MD = -4.47, 95%CI -4.47 to -4.47) had the highest likelihood of being the optimal therapy for reducing LVESD. ZGCD + CT seemed to be the most promising intervention on the improvement in hs-CRP (MD = -2.82, 95%CI -3.60 to -2.04) and 6MWT (MD = 141.00, 95%CI 136.57 to 145.43). However, the optimal CCP for improving BNP and CO could not be identified based on the present studies. No significant adverse events emerged in the included studies.ConclusionThis NMA indicated that adding CCPs to current CT treatment had a favorable effect on DCM. In light of the clinical efficacy and other outcomes, SMP + CT, SFD + CT, YXD + CT, and ZGCD + CT demonstrated a preferred improvement in patients with DCM when combined. Furthermore, additional larger RCTs with longer follow-up periods and standardized outcome reporting are required to give more solid evidence to support our findings due to the small sample size of the current studies and the presence of risk of bias.

Project description:ObjectiveSeveral antiseizure medications (ASMs) have been approved for the treatment of focal epilepsy. However, there is a paucity of evidence on direct comparison of ASMs. We evaluated the comparative efficacy and safety of all approved add-on ASMs for the treatment of focal epilepsy using network meta-analysis.MethodsData through extensive literature search was retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrial.gov databases using predefined search terms from inception through March 2023. PRISMA reporting guidelines (CRD42023403450) were followed in this study. Efficacy outcomes assessed were ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% responder rates. Patient retention rate and safety outcomes such as overall treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and individual TEAEs were assessed. "Gemtc" 4.0.4 package was used to perform Bayesian analysis. Outcomes are reported as relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsLiterature search retrieved 5807 studies of which, 75 studies were included in the analysis. All ASMs showed significantly higher ≥50% responder rate compared with placebo. Except the ≥75% seizure frequency reduction for zonisamide (2.23; 95% CI: 1.00-5.70) and 100% for rufinamide (2.03; 95% CI: 0.54-11.00), all other interventions showed significantly higher ≥75% and 100% responder rates compared with placebo. Among treatments, significantly higher 100% responder rate was observed with cenobamate compared to eslicarbazepine (10.71; 95% CI: 1.56-323.9) and zonisamide (10.63; 95% CI: 1.37-261.2). All ASMs showed a lower patient retention rate compared to placebo, with the least significant value observed for oxcarbazepine (0.77; 95% CI: 0.7-0.84). Levetiracetam showed a lower risk of incidence (1.0; 95%CI: 0.94-1.1; SUCRA: 0.885067) for overall TEAE compared with other medications.SignificanceAll approved ASMs were effective as add-on treatment for focal epilepsy. Of the ASMs included, cenobamate had the greatest likelihood of allowing patients to attain seizure freedom.Plain language summaryThis article compares the efficacy and safety of antiseizure medications (ASMs) currently available to neurologists in the treatment of epileptic patients. Several newer generation ASMs that have been developed may be as effective or better than the older medications. We included 75 studies in the analysis. In comparison, all drugs improved ≥50%, ≥75% and 100% responder rates compared to control, except for Zonisamide and Rufinamide in the ≥75% and 100% responder rate categories. Retention of patients undergoing treatment was lower in drugs than placebo. All drugs were tolerated, the levetiracetam showed the best tolerability. Cenobamate more likely help completely to reduce seizures.

Dataset Information

Comparing the efficacy and safety of medications in adults with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Comparing the efficacy and safety of medications in adults with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets