Dataset Information

Differences in mobile food market customer outcomes between 2019 and 2021.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To evaluate the outcomes of increasing mobile market service from mostly biweekly in 2019 to weekly in 2021.

Design

Repeated, cross-sectional customer intercept surveys.

Sample

Mobile market customers in Summers 2019 (N = 302) and 2021 (N = 72).

Intervention

Mobile food markets bring affordable, high-quality foods to communities that lack such access.

Measures/analysis

Outcomes included food security, fruit/vegetable intake, and food-related characteristics and behaviors. General linear and logistic regression models were used to assess associations between outcomes and survey year and length of mobile market shopping. Models were adjusted for economic assistance use, race, and ethnicity.

Results

No outcomes were significantly different between 2019 (with mostly biweekly service) and 2021 (with weekly service). Length of mobile market shopping (e.g., >2 years, 1-2 years, etc.) was positively associated with affordable, quality food access (β = 0.20, SE = 0.10, p = .03) and fruit/vegetable intake (β = 0.28, SE = 0.08, p < .001) as well as lower odds of food insecurity in the last 12 months (aOR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.64, 0.99).

Conclusions

Despite COVID-19 interrupting scheduled market service, the length of time that a survey respondent identified as a full-service mobile market customer was associated with higher food access and fruit/vegetable intake and reduced food insecurity odds. These findings suggest promise and encourage further evaluation.

SUBMITTER: Horning ML

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10527819 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Sep-Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Differences in mobile food market customer outcomes between 2019 and 2021.

Horning Melissa L ML Bell Adrianna A Porter Leah L Wagner Stephanie S Alver Bonnie B Kamdar Nipa N

Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.) 20230511 5

<h4>Objectives</h4>To evaluate the outcomes of increasing mobile market service from mostly biweekly in 2019 to weekly in 2021.<h4>Design</h4>Repeated, cross-sectional customer intercept surveys.<h4>Sample</h4>Mobile market customers in Summers 2019 (N = 302) and 2021 (N = 72).<h4>Intervention</h4>Mobile food markets bring affordable, high-quality foods to communities that lack such access.<h4>Measures/analysis</h4>Outcomes included food security, fruit/vegetable intake, and food-related charact ...[more]

PMID: 37166791

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionMobile food markets may help to mitigate diet-related and weight-related inequities by bringing low-cost, nutritious food directly to underserved populations. By stocking foods to meet a range of dietary needs, full-service mobile markets may improve multiple aspects of diet, food security and fruit and vegetable procurement with a convenient one-stop shop.Methods and analysisThis cluster randomised trial is evaluating the impact of a full-service mobile market, the Twin Cities Mobile Market (TCMM). The TCMM sells staple foods at affordable prices from a retrofitted bus that regularly visits communities experiencing low incomes. The trial's primary outcome is participant diet quality. Secondary outcomes include intake of specific foods and nutrients, food security and servings of fruits and vegetables procured for the home.Together with our partners, we enrolled four subsidised community housing sites in three waves (12 total sites), aimed to recruit 22 participants per site (N=264) and collected baseline data. Sites were then randomised to either receive the full-service TCMM intervention or serve as a waitlist control, and the full-service TCMM began implementing at intervention sites. Follow-up data collection is occurring at 6 months post-implementation. After follow-up data collection for each wave, the full-service TCMM intervention is being implemented at the waitlist control sites. Waves 1 and 2 are complete and Wave 3 is in progress.At baseline and follow-up data collection, dietary quality and intake are being assessed through three, interviewer-administered, 24-hour dietary recalls, food insecurity is being assessed by the 18-item Food Security Screening Module and fruit and vegetable procurement is being measured by collecting one month of food procurement tracking forms.We will use intent-to-treat analyses to determine if participant diet quality, food security and procurement of fruits and vegetables improve in the sites that received the full-service TCMM intervention relative to the participants in the waitlist control condition.Ethics and disseminationTrial procedures have been approved by the University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board. We plan to disseminate main outcomes in Grant Year 5 in both scientific and community spaces.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05672186.

Project description:BackgroundPurchases at small/non-traditional food stores tend to have poor nutritional quality, and have been associated with poor health outcomes, including increased obesity risk The purpose of this study was to examine whether customers who shop at small/non-traditional food stores with more health promoting features make healthier purchases.MethodsIn a cross-sectional design, data collectors assessed store features in a sample of 99 small and non-traditional food stores not participating in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) in Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN in 2014. Customer intercept interviews (n = 594) collected purchase data from a bag check and demographics from a survey. Store measures included fruit/vegetable and whole grain availability, an overall Healthy Food Supply Score (HFSS), healthy food advertisements and in-store placement, and shelf space of key items. Customer nutritional measures were analyzed using Nutrient Databases System for Research (NDSR), and included the purchase of ≥1 serving of fruits/vegetables; ≥1 serving of whole grains; and overall Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010) score for foods/beverages purchased. Associations between store and customer measures were estimated in multilevel linear and logistic regression models, controlling for customer characteristics and store type.ResultsFew customers purchased fruits and vegetables (8%) or whole grains (8%). In fully adjusted models, purchase HEI-2010 scores were associated with fruit/vegetable shelf space (p = 0.002) and the ratio of shelf space devoted to healthy vs. less healthy items (p = 0.0002). Offering ≥14 varieties of fruit/vegetables was associated with produce purchases (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.2-12.3), as was having produce visible from the store entrance (OR 2.3 95% CI 1.0 to 5.8), but whole grain availability measures were not associated with whole grain purchases.ConclusionsStrategies addressing both customer demand and the availability of healthy food may be necessary to improve customer purchases.Trial registrationClinialTrials.gov: NCT02774330 . Registered May 4, 2016 (retrospectively registered).

Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between gestational weight gain (GWG) and adverse neonatal outcomes in women who conceived using assisted reproductive technology (ART).MethodsThe National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) 2019-2021 provided data for this retrospective cohort study. Adverse neonatal outcomes included premature birth, small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), macrosomia, low birth weight (LBW), and other abnormal conditions. Any adverse outcome was defined as at least one of the above six outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to evaluate the associations between GWG and different outcomes, after adjusting for confounding factors. These associations were further assessed in subgroups of maternal age at delivery, paternal age at delivery, preconception body mass index (BMI), gestational age, maternal race, parity, gestational diabetes, and gestational hypertension.ResultsTotally 108201 women were included, with 22282 in the insufficient GWG group, 38034 in the sufficient GWG group, and 47885 in the excessive GWG group. Women with insufficient GWG [odds ratios (OR) = 1.11, 95%CI: 1.07-1.16, P<0.001] and excessive GWG (OR = 1.14, 95%CI: 1.10-1.18, P<0.001) had significantly greater risks of any adverse outcome than those with sufficient GWG. In contrast to sufficient GWG, insufficient GWG was associated with significantly elevated risks of premature birth (OR = 1.42, 95%CI: 1.35-1.48, P<0.001), SGA (OR = 1.45, 95%CI: 1.37-1.53, P<0.001), LBW (OR = 1.47, 95%CI: 1.37-1.58, P<0.001), and other abnormal conditions (OR = 1.32, 95%CI: 1.27-1.39, P<0.001), and excessive GWG was associated with significantly lower risks of premature birth (OR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.83-0.90, P<0.001), SGA (OR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.75-0.83, P<0.001), LBW (OR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.79-0.91, P<0.001), and other abnormal conditions (OR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.88-0.96, P<0.001). Infants born to women with insufficient GWG had significantly decreased risks of LGA (OR = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.66-0.75, P<0.001) and macrosomia (OR = 0.68, 95%CI: 0.63-0.74, P<0.001), and infants born to women with excessive GWG had significantly increased risks of LGA (OR = 1.50, 95%CI: 1.44-1.56, P<0.001) and macrosomia (OR = 1.60, 95%CI: 1.51-1.69, P<0.001).ConclusionInsufficient GWG and excessive GWG were associated with increased risks of any adverse outcome than sufficient GWG in women who conceived with ART, indicating the applicability of recommended GWG by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in this population.

Dataset Information

Differences in mobile food market customer outcomes between 2019 and 2021.

Objectives

Design

Sample

Intervention

Measures/analysis

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Differences in mobile food market customer outcomes between 2019 and 2021.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets