Dataset Information

A retrospective real-world study: the efficacy of immune-related combination therapies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer after resistance to EGFR-TKIs.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Whether patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) should choose an immune-combination therapy regimen after EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) resistance is currently unclear.

Methods

We evaluated 118 NSCLC patients treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) + chemotherapy (I + C), ICIs + chemotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy (I + C + A), chemotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy (C + A) after inefficacy of EGFR-TKIs. We assessed the objective remission rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS) of these treatments.

Results

The ORR was 26.1% vs 38.2% vs 16.3% in the three groups (P = 0.093). The divergence in DCR was also statistically significant (65.2% vs 85.3% vs 74.4%, P = 0.209). The median PFS was no statistically significant difference in PFS (3.09 vs 6.31 vs 5.91 months, P = 0.809), but the Kaplan-Meier survival curve of 12-month-PFS indicated an apparent survival advantage in the I + C + A group (P = 0.001). In addition, the I + C/I + C + A group showed higher median PFS than the C + A group in patients with brain metastases (median PFS, 6.44 vs 4.21 months, P = 0.022). The divergence in ORR of patients in the brain group was also statistically significant (P = 0.045). The I + C + A group showed superior efficacy in patients with liver metastases (median PFS, 0.95 vs 6.44 vs 3.48 months, P < 0.0001). The Cox proportional hazard modeling analysis suggested that the age, brain metastases, and liver metastases were all connected with the prognosis.

Conclusions

This study suggests that advanced NSCLC patients after resistance to EGFR-TKIs may achieve better outcomes from triple therapy. Patients with brain metastases favor ICIs-related combination therapies and patients with liver metastases prefer I + C + A therapy.

SUBMITTER: Cai R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10700213 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A retrospective real-world study: the efficacy of immune-related combination therapies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer after resistance to EGFR-TKIs.

Cai Ruoxue R Liu Ying Y Yu Mingyan M Sha Huanhuan H Guo Mengya M Chen Yue Y Ye Jinjun J Zhou Guoren G Fang Ying Y Shen Bo B

Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII 20231031 12

<h4>Background</h4>Whether patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) should choose an immune-combination therapy regimen after EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) resistance is currently unclear.<h4>Methods</h4>We evaluated 118 NSCLC patients treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) + chemotherapy (I + C), ICIs + chemotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy (I + C + A), chemotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy (C + A) after inefficacy of EGFR-TKIs. We assessed the objective r ...[more]

PMID: 37907645

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in pretreated EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is controversial. We conducted this multicenter retrospective study to examine the efficacy of ICIs in a real world setting.Patients and methodsWe collected 116 consecutive NSCLC patients with sensitive EGFR mutations who received ICIs alone or in combination after failure to respond to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), and 99 patients were included for final analysis. The impacts of ICIs on the patients' objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. The relationships between outcomes and clinical characteristics were analyzed.ResultsThe ORR in patients with target lesions was 31.25% (95% CI: 22.18-41.52), and the DCR in all patients was 65.66% (95% CI: 55.44-74.91). The overall median PFS was 5.0 months (95% CI: 3.0-6.6), and the median OS was 15.9 months (95% CI: 10.8-23.8). The outcomes were better in patients receiving combination therapy with ECOG scores of 0-1 and no more than 2 lines of prior therapy, with a median PFS of 7.4 months (95% CI: 3.0-13.3) and a median OS of 29.0 months (95% CI: 11.7-NE). Primary EGFR mutation type and treatment mode were found to have a notable impact on clinical outcomes. Both median PFS and OS in patients with EGFR L858R mutation were significantly shorter than those in patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion (19del) (PFS: 2.5 versus 6.7 months, HR: 1.80, log-rank P=0.011; OS: 9.8 versus 26.9 months, HR: 2.48, log-rank P=0.002). Patients receiving combination therapy had notably longer median PFS and OS than those receiving monotherapy (PFS: 5.2 versus 3.0 months, HR: 0.54, log-rank P=0.020; OS: 19.0 versus 7.4 months, HR: 0.46, log-rank P=0.009).ConclusionsOur study suggests that ICI-based combination therapy is a potential strategy for EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients after EGFR-TKI failure. The efficacy may differ according to EGFR subtypes.

Project description:IntroductionThe epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in combination with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) agents have shown improved survival outcomes in recent studies. However, its efficacy related to survival outcomes as a first- or second-line agent and based on generations remains to be explored. This study estimated the survival outcomes of EGFR-TKIs plus anti-VEGFR in combination in defined populations of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients overall, as a first- or second line of treatment, with different generations of EGFR-TKIs and EGFR-TKIs plus bevacizumab combination as a subgroup.MethodsA literature search was conducted using PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases through June 2023 to identify primary research reporting the survival outcomes of EGFR-TKIs in combination with anti-VEGFR agents in patients with advanced NSCLC. Studies that were single-arm, published in non-English languages, and had missing data on survival outcomes were excluded. A meta-analysis was conducted to generate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Methodological quality and risk of bias in studies were assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions risk of bias tool.ResultsA total of 20 randomized controlled trials were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 11 (2182 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. Patients' median age ranged from 58 to 68 years; 36% to 70% of patients were female; most of them had IIIa/b to IV stage cancer. In meta-analyses, the EGFR-TKIs plus anti-VEGFR combination resulted in improved PFS (HR, 0.73; 95% CI: 0.61, 0.86; p < 0.00001) in patients with advanced NSCLC but had no impact on OS (HR, 0.93; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.10; p = 0.41). The first line of treatment and first-generation EGFR-TKIs with the combination also improved the PFS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI: 0.57, 0.71; p < 0.00001; HR, 0.63; 95% CI: 0.56, 0.71; p < 0.00001) respectively, however, had no impact on OS.ConclusionsOur meta-analysis indicated EGFR-TKIs with anti-VEGFR in combination not only improved overall PFS but also showed similar results to a first line and first-generation agent compared to EGFR-TKI alone.

Dataset Information

A retrospective real-world study: the efficacy of immune-related combination therapies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer after resistance to EGFR-TKIs.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

A retrospective real-world study: the efficacy of immune-related combination therapies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer after resistance to EGFR-TKIs.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets