Dataset Information

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced EGFR-Mutated non-small cell lung cancer after resistance to EGFR-TKIs: Real-World evidence from a multicenter retrospective study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in pretreated EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is controversial. We conducted this multicenter retrospective study to examine the efficacy of ICIs in a real world setting.

Patients and methods

We collected 116 consecutive NSCLC patients with sensitive EGFR mutations who received ICIs alone or in combination after failure to respond to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), and 99 patients were included for final analysis. The impacts of ICIs on the patients' objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. The relationships between outcomes and clinical characteristics were analyzed.

Results

The ORR in patients with target lesions was 31.25% (95% CI: 22.18-41.52), and the DCR in all patients was 65.66% (95% CI: 55.44-74.91). The overall median PFS was 5.0 months (95% CI: 3.0-6.6), and the median OS was 15.9 months (95% CI: 10.8-23.8). The outcomes were better in patients receiving combination therapy with ECOG scores of 0-1 and no more than 2 lines of prior therapy, with a median PFS of 7.4 months (95% CI: 3.0-13.3) and a median OS of 29.0 months (95% CI: 11.7-NE). Primary EGFR mutation type and treatment mode were found to have a notable impact on clinical outcomes. Both median PFS and OS in patients with EGFR L858R mutation were significantly shorter than those in patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion (19del) (PFS: 2.5 versus 6.7 months, HR: 1.80, log-rank P=0.011; OS: 9.8 versus 26.9 months, HR: 2.48, log-rank P=0.002). Patients receiving combination therapy had notably longer median PFS and OS than those receiving monotherapy (PFS: 5.2 versus 3.0 months, HR: 0.54, log-rank P=0.020; OS: 19.0 versus 7.4 months, HR: 0.46, log-rank P=0.009).

Conclusions

Our study suggests that ICI-based combination therapy is a potential strategy for EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients after EGFR-TKI failure. The efficacy may differ according to EGFR subtypes.

SUBMITTER: Hu J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9504865 | biostudies-literature | 2022

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced <i>EGFR</i>-Mutated non-small cell lung cancer after resistance to EGFR-TKIs: Real-World evidence from a multicenter retrospective study.

Hu Jia J Huang Di D Wang Yanrong Y Li Donghui D Yang Xuejiao X Fu Yan Y Du Nan N Zhao Yan Y Li Xiaosong X Ma Junxun J Hu Yi Y

Frontiers in immunology 20220909

<h4>Background</h4>The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in pretreated <i>EGFR</i>-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is controversial. We conducted this multicenter retrospective study to examine the efficacy of ICIs in a real world setting.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>We collected 116 consecutive NSCLC patients with sensitive <i>EGFR</i> mutations who received ICIs alone or in combination after failure to respond to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), an ...[more]

PMID: 36159795

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectivesEpidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are standard-of-care first-line (1L) treatment for EGFR mutation-positive advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. In 2015, osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI, received US accelerated approval for second-line (2L) EGFR T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer treatment. The objective of this US study was to characterize treatment patterns, attrition, and survival in EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer, after 1L first-/second-generation EGFR-TKI treatment.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 1029 patients diagnosed with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer from 1 January, 2011 to 31 December, 2018 using the US electronic medical record CancerLinQ Discovery® database. Demographic/disease characteristics, EGFR mutations, treatments, and death dates were collected.ResultsFrom 1 January, 2011 to 31 December, 2014 (< 2015 cohort), 519 patients received 1L EGFR-TKIs and 510 between 1 January, 2015 and 31 December, 2018 (≥ 2015 cohort). Median follow-up from advanced diagnosis was 19.8 months (interquartile range: 9.9-33.4 months). Twenty-eight percent of patients (288/1029) died without receiving 2L, and 52% (539/1029) initiated 2L with 35% (186/539) receiving osimertinib; in the < 2015 and ≥ 2015 cohorts, the same proportion initiated 2L (52%; 272/519 vs 267/510, respectively). Median overall survival from advanced diagnosis for patients initially diagnosed with stage I-IIIA disease was 43.3 months (95% confidence interval 30.9-73.7), vs 26.4 months (95% confidence interval 24.4-28.1) for stage IIIB-IV; all-cause mortality hazard ratio: 1.56 (95% confidence interval 1.2-2.0; p = 0.001).ConclusionsWe identified disease stage, performance status, and central nervous system metastasis as survival predictors, highlighting the importance of optimal 1L treatment selection. Over a quarter of patients died before initiating 2L; half progressed after 1L and received 2L, of whom a third received 2L osimertinib.

Project description:BackgroundKRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog) gene mutation is one of the common driver gene mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with poor prognosis. There are limited effective treatments for advanced NSCLC patients with KRAS mutation. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PD-1/L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as a first-line immunotherapy for advanced NSCLC patients harboring KRAS oncogene mutation.MethodsThis multicenter retrospective real-world study was conducted from 2019 to 2024 at Shanghai Changzheng Hospital and Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, including 78 patients who received immunotherapy using PD-1/L1 ICIs, and 29 patients who received traditional platinum-doublet chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and correlation of prognostic biomarkers with survival outcomes.ResultsNo significant difference in ORR and DCR was observed between the two groups. The median PFS in immunotherapy group was longer than that in chemotherapy group [7.9 months (95% CI: 5.3-10.5) vs. 6.0 months (95% CI: 3.8-8.2), P = 0.030], and there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups (16.2 vs. 19.2 months, P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified PD-L1 expression as an independent protective factor for PFS (HR = 0.397, 95% CI: 0.178-0.887, P = 0.024), and elevated CRP (HR = 1.005, 95% CI: 1.001-1.010, P = 0.022), CEA (HR = 1.008, 95% CI: 1.001-1.014, P = 0.030) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (HR = 1.105, 95% CI: 1.024-1.193, P = 0.010) were independent risk factors for progression.ConclusionThe first-line treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs showed numerically better clinical efficacy than the traditional double-agent chemotherapy in patients with KRAS-mutated NSCLC, especially in PFS. Additionally, PD-L1 expression, C reactive protein, CEA, and NLR could serve as markers for predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with KRAS-mutated NSCLC.

Project description:BackgroundAlthough immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) generally show poor therapeutic efficacy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, certain research indicate that a small proportion of these patients do respond to ICIs. The present study sought to identify the features of patients with EGFR mutations who might benefit from ICIs from multiple studies and discussed the optimal treatment paradigm for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations.MethodsThe profiles of 114 advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations who received ICIs treatment were retrospectively reviewed. EGFR subtypes, programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and clinical characteristics regarding their impact on the efficacy of ICIs were investigated.ResultsPatients with major EGFR mutations (L858R or 19Del) had a shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and a lower objective response rate (ORR) as compared to patients with rare (20ins or G719X) and other EGFR mutations. Although not statistically significant, median overall survival (OS) tended to be longer in patients with negative (<1%) PD-L1 expression than with positive (≥1%) PD-L1 expression (15.61 vs. 7.40 months, p = 0.138). Median PFS and OS were significantly shorter in heavily treated patients (prior lines of therapy ≥3 lines vs. <3 lines: mPFS, 1.80 vs. 2.50 months, p = 0.003; mOS, 6.70 vs. 14.00 months, p = 0.031). ORR was also lower in patients who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy compared to in those <3 prior lines of therapy (0.00% vs. 21.67%, p = 0.002).ConclusionPatients with major EGFR mutations showed poorer responses to ICIs than those with rare EGFR mutations. EGFR-mutated patients with lower PD-L1 expression showed a trend towards a longer OS after receiving ICIs. ICIs should be administered as early as possible to previously treated EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. ICI-based combined therapies may be a direction for treatment of these patient subtypes in the future.