Dataset Information

Differential cytokine and chemokine expression after ablation vs. resection in colorectal cancer liver metastasis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Surgical resection remains the main curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is increasingly employed for small, deep lying or otherwise inoperable lesions. However, RFA can induce pro-tumorigenic effects on residual tumor cells, hereby possibly promoting tumor recurrence. Contrastingly, post-RFA tumor debris as an antigen source can also generate anti-cancer immune responses. Utilizing this, current studies on combining RFA with immune therapy appear promising. Here, in an attempt to shed light on this controversy, cytokines involved in inflammation, (lymph)angiogenesis, immune cell recruitment and tumor cell invasion were investigated post-RFA versus post-resection in CRLM patients.

Methods

Cytokine and chemokine serum levels pre-operation, 4 h and 24 h post-operation were analyzed in CRLM patients undergoing RFA (n = 8) or partial hepatectomy (n = 9) using Multiplex immunoassays. Statistical analyses were performed between as well as within individual intervention groups.

Results

Post-RFA, significantly increased levels of acute phase proteins SAA1 and S100A8, IL-6, IL-1Ra, MIP3b (CCL19) and MMP9 were observed along with decreases in Fibronectin, MCP-1 (CCL2), and Tie-2. Post-resection, increased levels of PDGFbb, I309 (CCL1), Apelin, MIF, IL-1b and TNFα were seen. All p-values <0.05.

Conclusion

Pro-inflammatory responses mediated by different cytokines were seen after both RFA and resection, possibly influencing residual tumor cells and tumor recurrence. As both ablation and resection trigger inflammation and immune cell recruitment (albeit via distinct mechanisms), these data suggest that further research may explore combining immune therapy with not only RFA but also resection.

Key message

Analysis of patients' serum after radiofrequency ablation versus resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) showed that these interventions trigger inflammation and immune cell recruitment, via different cyto- and chemokine pathways. This suggests a possible future strategy of combining immune therapy with not only ablative techniques but also with resection of CRLM.

SUBMITTER: Frenkel N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10838949 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Differential cytokine and chemokine expression after ablation vs. resection in colorectal cancer liver metastasis.

Frenkel Nicola N Poghosyan Susanna S van Wijnbergen Jan Willem JW Rinkes Inne Borel IB Kranenburg Onno O Hagendoorn Jeroen J

Surgery open science 20240114

<h4>Background</h4>Surgical resection remains the main curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is increasingly employed for small, deep lying or otherwise inoperable lesions. However, RFA can induce pro-tumorigenic effects on residual tumor cells, hereby possibly promoting tumor recurrence. Contrastingly, post-RFA tumor debris as an antigen source can also generate anti-cancer immune responses. Utilizing this, current studies on combining RFA with ...[more]

PMID: 38318321

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceTumor relapse after partial hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) remains an unsolved issue. Intraoperative manipulation of the liver during conventional hepatectomy might enhance hematogenous tumor cell spread. The anterior approach is an alternative approach that may reduce intraoperative tumor cell dissemination.ObjectiveTo determine the efficacy and safety of the anterior approach compared with conventional hepatectomy in patients undergoing resection for CRLM.Design, setting, and participantsThis randomized clinical study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the anterior approach compared with conventional hepatectomy in adult patients with CRLM who were scheduled for hepatectomy from February 1, 2003, to March 31, 2012, at a tertiary-care hospital. A total of 80 patients with CRLM were randomized to the anterior approach and conventional hepatectomy groups in a 1:1 ratio. Bone marrow and blood samples were analyzed for disseminated tumor cells and circulating tumor cells (CTC) using cytokeratin 20 reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis. Data were analyzed from April 1 to December 1, 2018, using intention to treat.InterventionsAnterior approach vs conventional hepatectomy.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point was intraoperative CTC detection in central blood samples after liver resection. Secondary end points included postoperative morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival.ResultsAmong the 80 patients included in the analysis (48 men [60%]; mean [SD] age, 61 [10] years), baseline characteristics, including preoperative CTC detection, were comparable between both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in intraoperative CTC detection between patients in the conventional hepatectomy (5 of 21 [24%]) and anterior approach (6 of 22 [27%]) groups (P = .54). Except for a longer operating time in the anterior approach group (mean [SD], 171 [53] vs 221 [53] minutes; P < .001), there were no significant differences in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between both study groups. Although detection of CTC was associated with poor overall (median, 46 [95% CI, 40-52] vs 81 [95% CI, 54-107] months; P = .03) and disease-free (median, 40 [95% CI, 34-46] vs 60 [95% CI, 46-74] months; P = .04) survival, there was no significant difference in overall (median, 73 [95% CI, 42-104] vs 55 [95% CI, 35-75] months; P = .43) and disease-free (median, 48 [95% CI, 40-56] vs 40 [95% CI, 28-52] months; P = .88) survival between the conventional hepatectomy and anterior approach groups. Also, there was no significant difference in patterns of recurrence between both groups.Conclusions and relevanceThis randomized clinical trial found that the anterior approach was not superior to conventional hepatectomy in reducing intraoperative tumor cell dissemination in patients undergoing resection of CRLM.Trial registrationisrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN45066244.

Project description:ImportanceSimultaneous or delayed resection of synchronous liver metastasis (SLM) with primary colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a controversial topic.ObjectiveTo investigate the outcomes of simultaneous vs delayed resection in patients with resectable SLM.Design, setting, and participantsThis comparative effectiveness research study included 1569 patients with resectable SLM who underwent curative-intent liver resection at 3 independent centers in China between January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2019. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed. Follow-up was completed on August 31, 2021, and the data were analyzed from April 1 to 30, 2022.Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcome was the percentage of patients with at least 1 major complication within 60 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative complications, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates.ResultsAmong the 1569 patients included, 1057 (67.4%) underwent delayed resection (719 men [68.0%] with a mean [SD] age of 57.4 [11.2] years), and 512 patients (310 men [60.5%] with a mean [SD] age of 57.1 [10.5] years) underwent simultaneous resection. Matching yielded 495 pairs of patients underwent simultaneous resection. The percentage of major perioperative complications did not differ between the simultaneous and delayed resection groups (34.1% vs 30.0%; P = .89). The OS rates were 65.2% at 3 years, 47.1% at 5 years, and 38.0% at 8 years for the delayed resection group and 78.0% at 3 years, 65.4% at 5 years, and 63.1% at 8 years for the simultaneous resection group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% CI, 1.10-1.85, P = .003). The CSS rates were 68.3% at 3 years, 48.5% at 5 years, and 37.1% at 8 years for the delayed resection group and 79.2% at 3 years, 67.2% at 5 years, and 65.9% at 8 years for the simultaneous resection group (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.14-1.98; P = .004). On subgroup analysis comparing the 2 strategies according to the KRAS sequence variation status, the OS rates (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.45-2.18; P < .001) and CSS rates (HR, 1.62; 95 CI, 1.40-1.87; P = .003]) in the simultaneous resection group were significantly better than those in the delayed resection group in patients with KRAS wild-type tumors.Conclusions and relevanceResults of this study suggest that complication rates did not differ when CRC and SLM were resected simultaneously and that the survival benefits of simultaneous resection were restricted to patients with KRAS wild-type tumors. Integrating molecular features into the treatment decision is a basis for accurate, individualized treatments.

Project description:BackgroundThere has been no prospective or retrospective studies reporting the comparison outcome between surgery and ablation for resectable-ablative (lesions could be treated by resection or complete ablation) colorectal liver oligometastases (CLOM). The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and prognostic difference in patients who underwent R0 resection vs. complete ablation within the resectable-ablative CLOM criteria.MethodsFrom January 2008 to May 2018, a total of 2,367 patients diagnosed with colorectal liver metastases were included in this observational study. The metastasis was characterized by only limited to liver with number ≤5, size ≤5 cm, and resectable-ablative (lesions could be treated by resection or complete ablation). The evaluated indications, including liver progression-free survival (LPFS), overall survival (OS), survival rates, pattern and number of recurrences, and complications, were compared by using propensity score matching (PSM). The Kaplan-Meier curves were generated, and a log-rank test was performed. The Cox regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses to identify predictors of outcomes.ResultsA total of 421 consecutive patients were eligible for this study, with 250 and 171 undergoing R0 resection and complete ablation, respectively. PSM identified 145 patients from each group. The 1-, 3-, 5- and 8-year OS rates in the resection group and the ablation group were 95.8% vs. 95.0%, 69.8% vs. 60.1%, 53.6% vs. 42.5%, and 45.1% vs. 32.9% (p = 0.075), respectively. The median LPFS in the resection group was significantly longer than that in the ablation group (35 months vs. 15 months, p = 0.011). No statistical difference was found in LPFS between the two groups when comparing ≤3 cm liver metastases. For liver metastasis >3 cm, the median LPFS in the resection group and ablation group was 11 months and 5 months, respectively (p = 0.001). In terms of high risk of clinical risk score (CRS), the resection group showed longer LPFS than the ablation group (median 18 months vs. 10 months, p = 0.043).ConclusionFor patients within the CLOM criteria suggesting that liver metastases were resectable as well as ablative, resection could result in longer liver recurrence-free survival than ablation in cases with size >3 cm or high risk of CRS. But for ≤3 cm liver metastases, their treatment efficacies were comparable.

Project description:BackgroundSimultaneous resections have been increasingly performed for colorectal liver metastasis patients. However, studies explored risk stratification for these patients are scarce. Among which, a clear definition of early recurrence remains controversial and models for predicting early recurrence in these patients are lacking.MethodsColorectal liver metastasis patients who developed recurrence followed by simultaneous resection were enrolled. Early recurrence was determined by the minimum P value method, and patients were divided into an early recurrence group and late recurrence group. Standard clinical data were collected from each patient including demographics features, preoperative laboratory tests and postoperative regular follow-up results. All the data were accessed by clinicians and recorded accordingly. The nomogram for early recurrence was constructed in the training cohort and validated externally in the test cohort.ResultsThe optimal value of early recurrence by the minimum P value method was 13 months. A total of 323 patients were included in the training cohort, of which 241 (74.6%) experienced early recurrence. Seventy-one patients were included in the test cohort, of which 49 (69.0%) experienced early recurrence. Significantly worse post-recurrence survival (median 27.0 vs. 52.8 months, P=0.00083) and overall survival (median 33.8 vs. 70.9 months, P<0.0001) were observed in patients with early recurrence in the training cohort. Positive lymph node metastases (P=0.003), tumour burden scores ≥4.09 (P=0.001), preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios ≥1.44 (P=0.006), preoperative blood urea nitrogen levels ≥3.55 µmol/L (P=0.017) and postoperative complications (P=0.042) were independently associated with early recurrence, and all these predictors were included in the nomogram. The nomogram for predicting early recurrence had a receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.720 in the training cohort and a receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.740 in the test cohort. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration curves showed acceptable model calibration in the training set (P=0.7612) and in the test set (P=0.8671). The decision curve analysis results for the training cohort and test cohort also indicated that the nomogram showed good clinical applicability.ConclusionsOur findings provide clinicians with new insights into accurate risk stratification for colorectal liver metastasis patients receiving simultaneous resection and contributing to the management of patients.

Dataset Information

Differential cytokine and chemokine expression after ablation vs. resection in colorectal cancer liver metastasis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Key message

Publications

Differential cytokine and chemokine expression after ablation vs. resection in colorectal cancer liver metastasis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets