Dataset Information

PARC: a phase I/II study evaluating the safety and activity of pegylated recombinant human arginase BCT-100 in relapsed/refractory cancers of children and young adults.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The survival for many children with relapsed/refractory cancers remains poor despite advances in therapies. Arginine metabolism plays a key role in the pathophysiology of a number of pediatric cancers. We report the first in child study of a recombinant human arginase, BCT-100, in children with relapsed/refractory hematological, solid or CNS cancers.

Procedure

PARC was a single arm, Phase I/II, international, open label study. BCT-100 was given intravenously over one hour at weekly intervals. The Phase I section utilized a modified 3 + 3 design where escalation/de-escalation was based on both the safety profile and the complete depletion of arginine (defined as adequate arginine depletion; AAD <8μM arginine in the blood after 4 doses of BCT-100). The Phase II section was designed to further evaluate the clinical activity of BCT-100 at the pediatric RP2D determined in the Phase I section, by recruitment of patients with pediatric cancers into 4 individual groups. A primary evaluation of response was conducted at eight weeks with patients continuing to receive treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Results

49 children were recruited globally. The Phase I cohort of the trial established the Recommended Phase II Dose of 1600U/kg iv weekly in children, matching that of adults. BCT-100 was very well tolerated. No responses defined as a CR, CRi or PR were seen in any cohort within the defined 8 week primary evaluation period. However a number of these relapsed/refractory patients experienced prolonged radiological SD.

Conclusion

Arginine depletion is a clinically safe and achievable strategy in children with cancer. The RP2D of BCT-100 in children with relapsed/refractory cancers is established at 1600U/kg intravenously weekly and can lead to sustained disease stability in this hard to treat population.

Clinical trial registration

EudraCT, 2017-002762-44; ISRCTN, 21727048; and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03455140.

SUBMITTER: Fenwick N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10864630 | biostudies-literature | 2024

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

PARC: a phase I/II study evaluating the safety and activity of pegylated recombinant human arginase BCT-100 in relapsed/refractory cancers of children and young adults.

Fenwick Nicola N Weston Rebekah R Wheatley Keith K Hodgson Jodie J Marshall Lynley L Elliott Martin M Makin Guy G Ng Antony A Brennan Bernadette B Lowis Stephen S Adamski Jenny J Kilday John Paul JP Cox Rachel R Gattens Mike M Moore Andrew A Trahair Toby T Ronghe Milind M Campbell Martin M Campbell Helen H Williams Molly W MW Kirby Maria M Van Eijkelenburg Natasha N Keely Jennifer J Scarpa Ugo U Stavrou Victoria V Fultang Livingstone L Booth Sarah S Cheng Paul P De Santo Carmela C Mussai Francis F

Frontiers in oncology 20240131

<h4>Background</h4>The survival for many children with relapsed/refractory cancers remains poor despite advances in therapies. Arginine metabolism plays a key role in the pathophysiology of a number of pediatric cancers. We report the first in child study of a recombinant human arginase, BCT-100, in children with relapsed/refractory hematological, solid or CNS cancers.<h4>Procedure</h4>PARC was a single arm, Phase I/II, international, open label study. BCT-100 was given intravenously over one ho ...[more]

PMID: 38357205

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundNew clinical genomic assays for lymphoid cancers allow for improved disease stratification and prognostication. At present, clinical implementation has been appropriately limited, owing to a paucity of evidence to support clinical and cost effectiveness. Understanding patients' values for precision oncology under conditions of uncertainty can be used to inform priority-setting decisions.ObjectivesOur objective was to ascertain patients' qualitative preferences and attitudes for prognostic-based genomic testing.MethodsIndividuals who were diagnosed with lymphoid cancer between 2000 and 2018 in British Columbia, Canada, were recruited to participate in one of three focus groups. A maximum variation sampling technique was used to capture a diversity of perspectives. A patient partner was involved in the development of the focus group topic guide and presentation materials. All sessions were audio recorded and analyzed using NVivo qualitative analysis software, version 12.ResultsIn total, 26 participants took part in focus groups held between November 2018 and February 2019. Results illustrate qualitative preference heterogeneity for situations under which individuals would be willing to undergo genomic testing for relapsed lymphoid cancers. Preferences were highly contextualized within personal experiences with disease and treatment protocols. Hypothetical willingness to pay for testing was contingent on invasiveness, the potential for treatment de-escalation, and personal health benefit.ConclusionsPatients are supportive and accepting of evidentiary uncertainty up until the point at which they are required to trade-off the potential for improved quality and length of life. Demand for precision medicine is contingent on expectations for benefit alongside an acknowledgment of the opportunity cost required for implementation. The clinical implementation of precision medicine will be required to address evidentiary uncertainty surrounding personal benefit while ensuring equitable access to emerging innovations.

Dataset Information

PARC: a phase I/II study evaluating the safety and activity of pegylated recombinant human arginase BCT-100 in relapsed/refractory cancers of children and young adults.

Background

Procedure

Results

Conclusion

Clinical trial registration

Publications

PARC: a phase I/II study evaluating the safety and activity of pegylated recombinant human arginase BCT-100 in relapsed/refractory cancers of children and young adults.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets