Dataset Information

Coronary protection using a pressure wire during transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

ABSTRACT: Coronary obstruction is a rare but life-threatening complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This article describes the case of a patient with severe aortic valve stenosis treated with TAVI, during which preventive coronary wiring using a pressure wire was performed for coronary protection. After the deployment of the transcatheter heart valve (THV), the values of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) and resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) remarkably decreased, although the findings of transesophageal echocardiography and coronary angiography did not suggest coronary obstruction. Intravascular ultrasound revealed severe stenosis in the left main trunk due to the displacement of the calcified native leaflets. The decrease in the FFR and RFR values after THV deployment led to a diagnosis of partial coronary obstruction, and percutaneous coronary intervention was successfully performed. In patients at a high risk for coronary obstruction, coronary protection with a pressure wire is useful for the diagnosis and prevention of coronary flow deterioration during TAVI. Functional assessment using a pressure wire before and after TAVI may contribute to the accurate diagnosis of coronary obstruction.

Learning objective

Accurate diagnosis of coronary obstruction during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is important for successful management. In patients at a high risk for coronary obstruction, coronary protection with a pressure wire is useful for the diagnosis and prevention of coronary flow deterioration during TAVI. The remarkable decrease in the fractional flow reserve and resting full-cycle ratio values after the deployment of the transcatheter heart valve may suggest coronary obstruction.

SUBMITTER: Kikuchi S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10865119 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Coronary protection using a pressure wire during transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Kikuchi Shinnosuke S Terasaka Kengo K Minamimoto Yugo Y Cho Tomoki T Okada Kozo K Matsuzawa Yasushi Y Iwahashi Noriaki N Uchida Keiji K Hibi Kiyoshi K

Journal of cardiology cases 20231110 2

Coronary obstruction is a rare but life-threatening complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This article describes the case of a patient with severe aortic valve stenosis treated with TAVI, during which preventive coronary wiring using a pressure wire was performed for coronary protection. After the deployment of the transcatheter heart valve (THV), the values of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) and resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) remarkably decreased, although the findin ...[more]

PMID: 38362574

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsIn patients with aortic stenosis (AS), the coronary flow reserve decreases even in the absence of epicardial coronary artery stenosis. Systolic coronary flow reversal (SFR) reflecting reduced coronary microcirculation, often seen in patients with severe AS, has a potential negative impact on the pathogenesis of cardiac dysfunction. However, there are limited data on the relationship between the severity of AS and SFR, as well as on the benefits of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the severity of AS and efficacy of TAVI in improving SFR.Methods and resultsConsecutive patients with AS who had undergone TAVI using transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) from November 2020 to February 2022 were prospectively enrolled. Coronary flow in the left anterior descending artery as well as the aortic valve peak velocities, and the mean aortic valve pressure gradients (AVPGs), indicating the severity of AS, were measured using intraprocedural TEE before and after TAVI. The following parameters were measured as coronary flow: systolic and diastolic peak velocity (cm/s) and systolic and diastolic velocity-time integral (VTI) (cm). SFR was defined as the presence of a reversal coronary flow component in systole. The enrolled patients were classified into two groups according to the presence or absence of SFR before TAVI. A total of 25 patients were included: 13 had SFR and 12 who had no SFR, before TAVI. Patients with SFR had significantly higher aortic valve peak velocities (451.1 ± 45.9 vs. 372.1 ± 52.1 cm/s; P < 0.001) and mean AVPGs (49.2 ± 14.5 vs. 30.3 ± 11.6 mmHg; P = 0.002) than those without. The optimal binary cut-off aortic valve peak velocity values and the mean AVPG associated with the presence of SFR before TAVI were >410.0 cm/s (specificity, 75.0%; sensitivity, 92.3%) and >37.4 mmHg (specificity, 83.3%; sensitivity, 92.3%), respectively. After TAVI, SFR immediately disappeared in 11 of 13 patients with SFR (84.6%). Overall, the systolic coronary VTI significantly increased after TAVI (2.0 ± 4.7 vs. 6.4 ± 3.2 cm, P < 0.001), and this increase was greater in patients with SFR than in those without SFR before TAVI (interaction P = 0.035).ConclusionsSFR was found to be associated with the severity of AS and with a greater increase in systolic coronary flow immediately after TAVI.

Dataset Information

Coronary protection using a pressure wire during transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Learning objective

Publications

Coronary protection using a pressure wire during transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets