Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Personalized decision-making for aneurysm treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: development and validation of a clinical prediction tool.


ABSTRACT:

Background

In patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage suitable for endovascular coiling and neurosurgical clip-reconstruction, the aneurysm treatment decision-making process could be improved by considering heterogeneity of treatment effect and durability of treatment. We aimed to develop and validate a tool to predict individualized treatment benefit of endovascular coiling compared to neurosurgical clip-reconstruction.

Methods

We used randomized data (International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial, n = 2143) to develop models to predict 2-month functional outcome and to predict time-to-rebleed-or-retreatment. We modeled for heterogeneity of treatment effect by adding interaction terms of treatment with prespecified predictors and with baseline risk of the outcome. We predicted outcome with both treatments and calculated absolute treatment benefit. We described the patient characteristics of patients with ≥ 5% point difference in the predicted probability of favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Score 0-2) and of no rebleed or retreatment within 10 years. Model performance was expressed with the c-statistic and calibration plots. We performed bootstrapping and leave-one-cluster-out cross-validation and pooled cluster-specific c-statistics with random effects meta-analysis.

Results

The pooled c-statistics were 0.72 (95% CI: 0.69-0.75) for the prediction of 2-month favorable functional outcome and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.63-0.71) for prediction of no rebleed or retreatment within 10 years. We found no significant interaction between predictors and treatment. The average predicted benefit in favorable functional outcome was 6% (95% CI: 3-10%) in favor of coiling, but 11% (95% CI: 9-13%) for no rebleed or retreatment in favor of clip-reconstruction. 134 patients (6%), young and in favorable clinical condition, had negligible functional outcome benefit of coiling but had a ≥ 5% point benefit of clip-reconstruction in terms of durability of treatment.

Conclusions

We show that young patients in favorable clinical condition and without extensive vasospasm have a negligible benefit in functional outcome of endovascular coiling - compared to neurosurgical clip-reconstruction - while at the same time having a substantially lower probability of retreatment or rebleeding from neurosurgical clip-reconstruction - compared to endovascular coiling. The SHARP prediction tool ( https://sharpmodels.shinyapps.io/sharpmodels/ ) could support and incentivize a multidisciplinary discussion about aneurysm treatment decision-making by providing individualized treatment benefit estimates.

SUBMITTER: de Winkel J 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10868110 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Personalized decision-making for aneurysm treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: development and validation of a clinical prediction tool.

de Winkel Jordi J   Roozenbeek Bob B   Dijkland Simone A SA   Dammers Ruben R   van Doormaal Pieter-Jan PJ   van der Jagt Mathieu M   van Klaveren David D   Dippel Diederik W J DWJ   Lingsma Hester F HF  

BMC neurology 20240215 1


<h4>Background</h4>In patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage suitable for endovascular coiling and neurosurgical clip-reconstruction, the aneurysm treatment decision-making process could be improved by considering heterogeneity of treatment effect and durability of treatment. We aimed to develop and validate a tool to predict individualized treatment benefit of endovascular coiling compared to neurosurgical clip-reconstruction.<h4>Methods</h4>We used randomized data (International Suba  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9732662 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8147706 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4463029 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC4351666 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8751955 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7280262 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9868237 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10342051 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10968679 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9806002 | biostudies-literature