Dataset Information

Growth Hormone Mediators and Glycemic Control in Youths With Type 2 Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

Youth-onset type 2 diabetes (T2D) has a more aggressive phenotype than adult-onset T2D, including rapid loss of glycemic control and increased complication risk.

Objective

To identify associations of growth hormone mediators with glycemic failure, beta cell function, and insulin sensitivity in youth-onset T2D.

Design, setting, and participants

This post hoc secondary analysis of the Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) randomized clinical trial, which enrolled participants from July 2004 to February 2009, included 398 participants from 15 university-affiliated medical centers with available plasma samples from baseline and 36 months. Participants were youths aged 10 to 17 years with a duration of T2D of less than 2 years who were randomized to metformin, metformin plus lifestyle intervention, or metformin plus rosiglitazone. Participants were followed up for a mean (SD) of 3.9 (1.5) years during the trial, ending in 2011. Statistical analysis was performed from August 2022 to November 2023.

Exposure

Plasma insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), growth hormone receptor (GHR), and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1).

Main outcomes and measures

Main outcomes were (1) loss of glycemic control during the TODAY study, defined as hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 8% or more for 6 months or inability to wean from insulin therapy, and (2) baseline and 36-month measures of glycemia (fasting glucose, HbA1c), insulin sensitivity (1/fasting C-peptide), high-molecular-weight adiponectin, and beta cell function (C-peptide index, C-peptide oral disposition index).

Results

This analysis included 398 participants (mean [SD] age, 13.9 [2.0] years; 248 girls [62%]; 166 Hispanic participants [42%]; 134 non-Hispanic Black participants [34%], and 84 non-Hispanic White participants [21%]). A greater increase in IGF-1 level between baseline and 36 months was associated with lower odds of glycemic failure (odds ratio [OR], 0.995 [95% CI, 0.991-0.997]; P < .001) and higher C-peptide index per 100-ng/mL increase in IGF-1 (β [SE], 0.015 [0.003]; P < .001). A greater increase in log2 GHR level between baseline and 36 months was associated with higher odds of glycemic failure (OR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.05-2.99]; P = .04) and lower C-peptide index (β [SE], -0.02 [0.006]; P < .001). A greater increase in log2 IGFBP-1 level between baseline and 36 months was associated with higher odds of glycemic failure (OR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.09-1.74]; P = .007) and higher high-molecular-weight adiponectin (β [SE], 431 [156]; P = .007).

Conclusions and relevance

This study suggests that changes in plasma growth hormone mediators are associated with loss of glycemic control in youth-onset T2D, with IGF-1 associated with lower risk and GHR and IGFBP-1 associated with increased risk.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00081328.

SUBMITTER: Lu C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10905312 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Growth Hormone Mediators and Glycemic Control in Youths With Type 2 Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Lu Chang C Wolfs Danielle D El Ghormli Laure L Levitsky Lynne L LL Levitt Katz Lorraine E LE Laffel Lori M LM Patti Mary-Elizabeth ME Isganaitis Elvira E

JAMA network open 20240205 2

<h4>Importance</h4>Youth-onset type 2 diabetes (T2D) has a more aggressive phenotype than adult-onset T2D, including rapid loss of glycemic control and increased complication risk.<h4>Objective</h4>To identify associations of growth hormone mediators with glycemic failure, beta cell function, and insulin sensitivity in youth-onset T2D.<h4>Design, setting, and participants</h4>This post hoc secondary analysis of the Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) randomized ...[more]

PMID: 38421647

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMedical nutrition therapy is recognized as an important treatment option in type 2 diabetes. Most guidelines recommend eating a diet with a high intake of fiber-rich food including fruit. This is based on the many positive effects of fruit on human health. However some health professionals have concerns that fruit intake has a negative impact on glycemic control and therefore recommend restricting the fruit intake. We found no studies addressing this important clinical question. The objective was to investigate whether an advice to reduce the intake of fruit to patients with type 2 diabetes affects HbA1c, bodyweight, waist circumference and fruit intake.MethodsThis was an open randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups. The primary outcome was a change in HbA1c during 12 weeks of intervention. Participants were randomized to one of two interventions; medical nutrition therapy + advice to consume at least two pieces of fruit a day (high-fruit) or medical nutrition therapy + advice to consume no more than two pieces of fruit a day (low-fruit). All participants had two consultations with a registered dietitian. Fruit intake was self-reported using 3-day fruit records and dietary recalls. All assessments were made by the "intention to treat" principle.ResultsThe study population consisted of 63 men and women with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. All patients completed the trial. The high-fruit group increased fruit intake with 125 grams (CI 95%; 78 to 172) and the low-fruit group reduced intake with 51 grams (CI 95%; -18 to -83). HbA1c decreased in both groups with no difference between the groups (diff.: 0.19%, CI 95%; -0.23 to 0.62). Both groups reduced body weight and waist circumference, however there was no difference between the groups.ConclusionsA recommendation to reduce fruit intake as part of standard medical nutrition therapy in overweight patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes resulted in eating less fruit. It had however no effect on HbA1c, weight loss or waist circumference. We recommend that the intake of fruit should not be restricted in patients with type 2 diabetes.Trial registrationhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier: NCT01010594.

Project description:BackgroundSalsalate, a nonacetylated prodrug of salicylate, has been shown to decrease blood glucose concentration in small studies.ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of salsalate at different doses in patients with type 2 diabetes.DesignParallel randomized trial with computer-generated randomization and centralized allocation. Patients and investigators, including those assessing outcomes and performing analyses, were masked to group assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00392678)Setting3 private practices and 14 universities in the United States.PatientsPersons aged 18 to 75 years with fasting plasma glucose concentrations of 12.5 mmol/L or less (< or = 225 mg/dL) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels of 7.0% to 9.5% treated by diet, exercise, and oral medication at stable doses for at least 8 weeks.InterventionAfter a 4-week, single-masked run-in period, patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or salsalate in dosages of 3.0, 3.5, or 4.0 g/d for 14 weeks (27 patients each) in addition to their current therapy.MeasurementsChange in HbA1c was the primary outcome. Adverse effects and changes in measures of coronary risk and renal function were secondary outcomes.ResultsHigher proportions of patients in the 3 salsalate treatment groups experienced decreases in HbA1c levels of 0.5% or more from baseline (P = 0.009). Mean HbA1c changes were -0.36% (P = 0.02) at 3.0 g/d, -0.34% (P = 0.02) at 3.5 g/d, and -0.49% (P = 0.001) at 4.0 g/d compared with placebo. Other markers of glycemic control also improved in the 3 salsalate groups, as did circulating triglyceride and adiponectin concentrations. Mild hypoglycemia was more common with salsalate; documented events occurred only in patients taking sulfonylureas. Urine albumin concentrations increased in all salsalate groups compared with placebo. The drug was otherwise well tolerated.LimitationThe number of patients studied and the trial duration were insufficient to warrant recommending the use of salsalate for type 2 diabetes at this time.ConclusionSalsalate lowers HbA1c levels and improves other markers of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes and may therefore provide a new avenue for treatment. Renal and cardiac safety of the drug require further evaluation.Primary funding sourceNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health.

Project description:BackgroundSelf-monitoring of blood glucose among people with type 2 diabetes not treated with insulin does not appear to be effective in improving glycemic control. We investigated whether health professional review of telemetrically transmitted self-monitored glucose results in improved glycemic control in people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.Methods and findingsWe performed a randomized, parallel, investigator-blind controlled trial with centralized randomization in family practices in four regions of the United Kingdom among 321 people with type 2 diabetes and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) >58 mmol/mol. The supported telemonitoring intervention involved self-measurement and transmission to a secure website of twice-weekly morning and evening glucose for review by family practice clinicians who were not blinded to allocation group. The control group received usual care, with at least annual review and more frequent reviews for people with poor glycemic or blood pressure control. HbA1c assessed at 9 mo was the primary outcome. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed. 160 people were randomized to the intervention group and 161 to the usual care group between June 6, 2011, and July 19, 2013. HbA1c data at follow-up were available for 146 people in the intervention group and 139 people in the control group. The mean (SD) HbA1c at follow-up was 63.0 (15.5) mmol/mol in the intervention group and 67.8 (14.7) mmol/mol in the usual care group. For primary analysis, adjusted mean HbA1c was 5.60 mmol/mol / 0.51% lower (95% CI 2.38 to 8.81 mmol/mol/ 95% CI 0.22% to 0.81%, p = 0·0007). For secondary analyses, adjusted mean ambulatory systolic blood pressure was 3.06 mmHg lower (95% CI 0.56-5.56 mmHg, p = 0.017) and mean ambulatory diastolic blood pressure was 2.17 mmHg lower (95% CI 0.62-3.72, p = 0.006) among people in the intervention group when compared with usual care after adjustment for baseline differences and minimization strata. No significant differences were identified between groups in weight, treatment pattern, adherence to medication, or quality of life in secondary analyses. There were few adverse events and these were equally distributed between the intervention and control groups. In secondary analysis, there was a greater number of telephone calls between practice nurses and patients in the intervention compared with control group (rate ratio 7.50 (95% CI 4.45-12.65, p < 0.0001) but no other significant differences between groups in use of health services were identified between groups. Key limitations include potential lack of representativeness of trial participants, inability to blind participants and health professionals, and uncertainty about the mechanism, the duration of the effect, and the optimal length of the intervention.ConclusionsSupported telemonitoring resulted in clinically important improvements in control of glycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes in family practice. Current Controlled Trials, registration number ISRCTN71674628.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN 71674628.

Dataset Information

Growth Hormone Mediators and Glycemic Control in Youths With Type 2 Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance

Objective

Design, setting, and participants

Exposure

Main outcomes and measures

Results

Conclusions and relevance

Trial registration

Publications

Growth Hormone Mediators and Glycemic Control in Youths With Type 2 Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets