Dataset Information

Cilostazol versus Aspirin or Clopidogrel for Reducing Post-Stroke Aspiration Pneumonia: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

The association between the use of cilostazol as a post-stroke antiplatelet medication and a reduction in post-stroke pneumonia has been suggested. However, whether cilostazol has a greater preventive effect against post-stroke aspiration pneumonia (AP) than other antiplatelet medications remains unclear. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate whether cilostazol has a greater preventive effect against post-stroke AP than aspirin or clopidogrel.

Methods

Through the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we identified patients who were hospitalized for ischemic stroke between April 2012 and September 2019. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching between patients who received cilostazol alone at discharge and those who received aspirin or clopidogrel alone at discharge. The primary outcome was the 90-day readmission for post-stroke AP. The occurrence of recurrent ischemic stroke within 90 days was also evaluated.

Results

Among the 305,543 eligible patients with ischemic stroke, 65,141 (21%), 104,157 (34%), and 136,245 (45%) received cilostazol, aspirin, and clopidogrel, respectively. Propensity score matching generated 65,125 pairs. The cilostazol group had a higher proportion of 90-day post-stroke readmissions with AP than the aspirin or clopidogrel groups (1.5% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with recurrent ischemic stroke within 90 days was also higher in the cilostazol group (2.4% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.017).

Conclusion

The present study suggests that cilostazol may not have a greater effect on preventing post-stroke AP within 90 days than other antiplatelet medications. Nevertheless, further randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up periods are warranted.

SUBMITTER: Sato S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10997247 | biostudies-literature | 2024

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Cilostazol versus Aspirin or Clopidogrel for Reducing Post-Stroke Aspiration Pneumonia: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.

Sato So S Yamana Hayato H Kumazawa Ryosuke R Watanabe Hideaki H Fujita Asahi A Matsui Hiroki H Fushimi Kiyohide K Yasunaga Hideo H

Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) 20230816 2

<h4>Introduction</h4>The association between the use of cilostazol as a post-stroke antiplatelet medication and a reduction in post-stroke pneumonia has been suggested. However, whether cilostazol has a greater preventive effect against post-stroke aspiration pneumonia (AP) than other antiplatelet medications remains unclear. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate whether cilostazol has a greater preventive effect against post-stroke AP than aspirin or clopidogrel.<h4>Methods</h4>Through the Japanes ...[more]

PMID: 37586338

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and purposeAlthough dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel reduces the recurrence of ischemic stroke while significantly increasing the bleeding events compared with monotherapy, the CSPS.com trial (Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study combination) showed that DAPT using cilostazol was more effective without the bleeding risk. In the CSPS.com trial, aspirin or clopidogrel was used as the underlying antiplatelet drug. The effectiveness and safety of each combination were examined and clarified.MethodsIn the CSPS.com trial, a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study, patients with high-risk, noncardioembolic ischemic stroke 8 to 180 days after onset treated with aspirin or clopidogrel alone at the discretion of the physician in charge were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either monotherapy or DAPT using cilostazol and followed for 0.5 to 3.5 years. The primary efficacy outcome was first recurrence of ischemic stroke. The safety outcome was severe or life-threatening bleeding. The analysis was based on the underlying antiplatelet agents.ResultsA total of 763 patients taking aspirin and 1116 taking clopidogrel were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Although the clopidogrel group had more risk factors than the aspirin group, the primary efficacy outcome and safety outcome did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. In the aspirin group, the primary efficacy outcome and safety outcome did not differ significantly between the DAPT group and the aspirin-monotherapy group. In the clopidogrel group, the primary end point occurred at a rate of 2.31 per 100 patient-years in the DAPT group and 5.19 per 100 patient-years in the clopidogrel-monotherapy group (hazard ratio, 0.447 [95% CI, 0.258–0.774]). Safety outcome did not differ significantly between groups (0.51 per 100 patient-years versus 0.71 per 100 patient-years, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.730 [95% CI, 0.206–2.588]).ConclusionsThe combination of cilostazol and clopidogrel significantly reduced the recurrence of ischemic stroke without increasing the bleeding risk in noncardioembolic, high-risk patients.RegistrationURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01995370. URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/; Unique identifier: UMIN000012180.

Project description:IntroductionInjection laryngoplasty is a common procedure for patients with vocal fold dysfunction, but the literature on its benefits has been mainly focused on those related to structural lesions or laryngeal nerve involvement. Stroke patients may be at increased risk of aspiration due to insufficient vocal fold motion. However, how injection laryngoplasty can be of benefit in stroke patients has not been reported yet.Patient concernsSix chronic stroke patients with long-standing swallowing difficulties and who showed severe aspiration despite long-term swallowing rehabilitation.DiagnosisLaryngoscope evaluation revealed insufficient glottic closure as the cause of aspiration.InterventionsInjection laryngoplasty was done per-orally under local anaesthesia with calcium hydroxylapatite (Radiesse Voice, 1-1.5 mL) in an office setting. Respiratory pressures and peak cough flows were assessed at baseline and at 2 weeks follow-up.OutcomesAt 2 weeks, the mean peak cough flow (Δ = +95.09 L/min) increased significantly after the procedure. The maximal expiratory (Δ = +18.40 cm H2O) and inspiratory (Δ = +20.20 cm H2O) pressures also improved, indicating that injection laryngoplasty was effective in augmenting respiratory and cough parameters. All cases showed improvement in the Functional Oral Intake Scale (Δ = +4). Feeding tubes were successfully removed.ConclusionInjection laryngoplasty proved to be both successful and safe in improving glottic closure with immediate results in those who had failed to show a positive response after long-term swallowing rehabilitation. The positive and dramatic clinical outcomes were observed through changes in the coughing force. Our case series support the use of injection larygnoplasty as a powerful adjunctive treatment method to prevent aspiration pneumonia in post-stroke patients with vocal fold insufficiency. Pre- and post-injection peak cough flow changes may reflect improvement in glottic closure and indicate the safety of swallowing with reduced risk of aspiration.

Project description:Background/objectivesAddition of cilostazol or sarpogrelate to the standard dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin and clopidogrel has been implemented in patients that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stents in Korea. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple antiplatelet therapies.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was performed using the Korean National Insurance Claim Data of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2014. The study cohort population consisted of patients with ischemic heart diseases and a history of PCI. They were treated with antiplatelet therapy of aspirin, clopidogrel (AC); aspirin, clopidogrel, cilostazol (ACCi); or aspirin, clopidogrel, sarpogrelate (ACSa) during the index period from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2011. During the follow-up period up to December 31, 2014, the major adverse cardiac or cerebral events (MACCE) including death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and ischemic stroke were assessed. Bleeding complications were also evaluated as adverse drug events.ResultsOut of 93,876 patients with PCI during the index period, 69,491 patients started dual (AC) or triple therapy (ACSa or ACCi). The clinical outcomes of comparing ACSa and ACCi therapy showed beneficial effects in the ACSa group in the prevention of subsequent cardiac or cerebral events. After Propensity score-matching between ACSa and ACCi groups, there were significant differences in MI and revascularization, with corresponding HR of 0.38 (95% CI, 0.20-0.73) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.53-0.82) in ACSa vs. ACCi at 12 months, respectively. At the 24-month follow-up, the triple therapy groups (ACS or ACC) had a higher incidence of MACCE compared to the dual therapy (AC) group; ACSa vs. AC HR of 1.69 (95% CI, 1.62-1.77); ACC vs. AC HR of 1.22 (95% CI, 1.06-1.41). There was no significant difference in severe or life-threatening bleeding risk among three groups; ACSa vs. AC, HR of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.37-1.24), ACCi vs. AC, HR of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.77-1.09).ConclusionSarpogrelate-containing triple antiplatelet therapy demonstrated comparable rates of MACCE prevention to the conventional dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI without significantly increasing bleeding risk during the two-year follow-up period.

Dataset Information

Cilostazol versus Aspirin or Clopidogrel for Reducing Post-Stroke Aspiration Pneumonia: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Cilostazol versus Aspirin or Clopidogrel for Reducing Post-Stroke Aspiration Pneumonia: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets