Project description:Central arterial pressure rises to much higher levels during heavy isometric exercise compared to other forms of exercise. For this reason, patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) are often restricted from heavy isometric exercise. Although this approach may be theoretically appealing, no data exist regarding the efficacy of this activity restriction.Patients between 12 and 21 years old with isolated BAV were enrolled if they had a previous echocardiogram at least 2 years prior to the current clinic visit. Patients were excluded if they had additional congenital heart disease, a diagnosed syndrome, or had undergone a procedure involving the aortic valve or ascending aorta. Patients completed a questionnaire regarding frequency and intensity of isometric exercise during the 3-month period prior to the visit. We compared aortic dimensions (Z-score), aortic stenosis, and aortic insufficiency between an echocardiogram performed as part of the current visit and one obtained 2-5 years previously using paired t tests and multivariable regression controlling for age, gender, degree of aortic stenosis, and the presence of isometric exercise. In this sample of 50 adolescents with isolated bicuspid aortic valve, 30 (60%) subjects did not participate in any isometric exercise. Over an average of 2.9 years (SD 0.9 years), we did not find a significant difference between changes in the Z-score diameters of the aortic root (0.9 vs 0.9, p = 0.913) and ascending aorta Z-score (2.9 vs 2.9, p = 0.757), between subjects engaging and not engaging in isometric exercise. Further, we did not find that changes in valve function (i.e., aortic stenosis and aortic insufficiency) differed between the two groups.In this sample of adolescents with isolated bicuspid aortic valve, there was no medium-term increase in aortic dilation or worsening valve function in those who engaged in isometric exercise versus those who refrained from isometric exercise.
Project description:BackgroundAlthough a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is known to be associated with progressive ascending aortic dilatation, the fate of the residual aorta after aortic valve and ascending aorta surgery is unknown. We reviewed surgical outcomes and explored serial changes in the size of the sinus of Valsalva (SOV) and distal ascending aorta (DAAo) in 89 patients with a BAV undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) and graft replacement (GR) of the ascending aorta.MethodsWe retrospectively examined patients who underwent AVR and GR of the ascending aorta for BAV-and related disease and thoracic aortic dilatation at our institution between January 2009 and December 2018. Patients who underwent AVR alone or required intervention for the aortic root and aortic arch and patients with connective tissue diseases were excluded. Aortic diameters were examined using computed tomography (CT). Late CT more than 1 year after surgery was performed in 69 patients (78%) with a mean follow-up of 4.9±2.8 years.ResultsThe surgical indication for aortic valve etiology was stenosis in 61 patients (69%), regurgitation in 10 (11%), and mixed in 18 (20%). Preoperative maximum short diameters of the ascending aorta, SOV, and DAAo were 47.3±4.7, 36.0±5.2, and 37.2±3.6 mm, respectively. The diameter of the SOV increased non-significantly by 0.08±0.45 mm per year [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.12 to 0.11, P=0.150], while that of the DAAo increased significantly by 0.11±0.40 mm per year (95% CI: 0.02-0.21, P=0.005). One patient required reoperation 6 years postoperatively due to a pseudo-aneurysm at the proximal anastomotic site. No patient required reoperation due to progressive dilatation of the residual aorta. According to the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the long-term survival rates were 98.9%, 98.9%, and 92.7% at 1, 5, and 10 years postoperatively, respectively.ConclusionsRapid dilatation of the residual aorta rarely occurred in patients with a BAV who underwent AVR and GR of the ascending aorta in the mid-term follow-up. For selected patients with a surgical indication for ascending aortic dilatation, simple AVR and GR of the ascending aorta may be sufficient surgical options.
Project description:Individuals with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) are at significantly higher risk of developing aortic complications than individuals with tricuspid aortic valves (TAV) and defective signaling during the embryonic development and/or life time exposure to abnormal hemodynamic have been proposed as underlying factors. However, an explanation for the molecular mechanisms of aortopathy in BAV has not yet been provided. We combined proteomics, RNA analyses, immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopy to identify molecular differences in samples of non-dilated ascending aortas from BAV (N = 62) and TAV (N = 54) patients. Proteomic analysis was also performed for dilated aortas (N = 6 BAV and N = 5 TAV) to gain further insight into the aortopathy of BAV. Our results collectively showed the molecular signature of an endothelial/epithelial-mesenchymal (EndMT/EMT) transition-like process, associated with instability of intimal cell junctions and activation of RHOA pathway in the intima and media layers of ascending aorta in BAV patients. We propose that an improper regulation of EndMT/EMT during the spatiotemporally related embryogenesis of semilunar valves and ascending aorta in BAV individuals may result in aortic immaturity and instability prior to dilation. Exasperation of EndMT/EMT state in post embryonic life and/or exposure to non-physiological hemodynamic could lead to the aneurysm of ascending aorta in BAV individuals.
Project description:ObjectivesAneurysm diameter and growing rate does not represent a definite parameter for operation in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), ascending aortic aneurysm and normal root patients. Thus, we investigated histological and immunohistochemical aspects of different segments of ascending aorta (precisely, aortic root without dilatation, aneurysmatic tubular portion, dissected ascending aorta) and genetic features of patients with BAV and ascending aorta complication (aneurysm or dissection).MethodsAorta tissue samples of 24 BAV patients were examined. The patients comprised of 18 men and 6 women; the mean age was 54.2 ± 14.3 years. All patients underwent composite aortic root replacement (button Bentall operation). Multiple histological sections were prepared from each aortic specimen. The evaluated features included elastic fibre fragmentation, cystic medial change, smooth muscle cell necrosis, medial fibrosis, and the markers of medial apoptosis and the metalloproteinases. Furthermore, genetic risk factors were also investigated.ResultsThe same medial degenerative lesions in tissue samples of different aorta segments (precisely of aortic root without dilatation, and aneurysmatic ascending aorta portion) were observed. More significant associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (-786T/C endothelial nitric oxide synthase enzyme, D/I angiotensin-converting enzyme, -1562C/T metalloproteinase-9 and -735C/T metalloproteinase-2) and aneurysm risk were detected in BAV patients than in controls.ConclusionsBased on our histological and genetic data, we underline that a surgical approach in patients with BAV, ascending aortic aneurysm and normal root, should consider not only the diameter of the aneurysmatic aortic portion but also the histological features of the whole ascending aorta and the genetic risk profile.
Project description:BackgroundEdwards Intuity is recognized as a relatively contraindicated bioprosthesis for bicuspid aortic valve disease. This study compared the early echocardiographic and clinical outcomes of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement for bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valves.MethodsOf 278 patients who underwent rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement using Intuity at Seoul National University Hospital, 252 patients were enrolled after excluding those with pure aortic regurgitation, prosthetic valve failure, endocarditis, and quadricuspid valves. The bicuspid and tricuspid groups included 147 and 105 patients, respectively. Early outcomes and the incidence of paravalvular leak were compared between the groups. A subgroup analysis compared the outcomes for type 0 versus type 1 or 2 bicuspid valves.ResultsThe bicuspid group had more male and younger patients. Comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and coronary artery disease, were less prevalent in the bicuspid group. Early echocardiographic evaluations demonstrated that the incidence of ≥mild paravalvular leak did not differ significantly between the groups (5.5% vs. 1.0% in the bicuspid vs. tricuspid groups, p=0.09), and the early clinical outcomes were also comparable between the groups. In the subgroup analysis between type 0 and type 1 or 2 bicuspid valves, the incidence of mild or greater paravalvular leak (2.4% vs. 6.7% in type 0 vs. type 1 or 2, p=0.34) and clinical outcomes were comparable.ConclusionRapid-deployment aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valves demonstrated comparable early echocardiographic and clinical outcomes to those for tricuspid aortic valves, and the outcomes were also satisfactory for type 0 bicuspid aortic valves.
Project description:Genome wide DNA methylation profiling of ascending aorta tissue samples from normal, aortic dissection and bicuspid aortic valve patients with aortic dilation. The Illumina Infinium 450k Human DNA methylation Beadchip was used to obtain DNA methylation profiles across more than 450,000 CpGs in ascending aorta samples. Samples included 6 normal donors, 12 patients with aortic dissection and 6 patients with bicuspid aortic valve and dilated aorta.
Project description:This original clinical research study id focused on description of baseline anatomy and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients presenting with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). We compared this BAV population with a population of patients with AS and tricuspid aortic valves after a propensity score matching developed by a multivariate logistic regression according to a non-parsimonious approach. Baseline anatomical characteristics were obtained by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and multi-sliced computed tomography (MSCT) and compared by chi-square and t-student tests. Outcomes were evaluated by correct fisher test at in hospital and 30 days follow-up. We found that BAV patients presents more complicated baseline anatomy as compared to patients with tricuspid valves. These anatomical features lead to higher procedural complications as the need for a second device implantation. However this does not translate into increase in mortality rate at 30 days follow-up but rather correlate to a lower device success rate.
Project description:ObjectivesBicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital valvular abnormality and frequently presents with accelerated calcific aortic valve disease, requiring aortic valve replacement (AVR) and thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection. Supporting evidence for Association Guidelines of aortic dimensions for aortic resection is sparse. We sought to determine whether concurrent repair of dilated or aneurysmal aortic disease during AVR in patients with BAV substantially improves morbidity and mortality outcomes.MethodsMortality and reoperation outcomes of 1301 adults with BAV and dilated aorta undergoing AVR-only surgery were compared to patients undergoing AVR with aortic resection (AVR-AR) using Cox proportional hazards modelling and patient matching.ResultsClinically important differences in patient characteristics, aortic valve function and aortic dimensions were identified between cohorts. Event rates were low, with rates of reoperation and death within 1 year of only 1.8% and 5.4%, respectively, and no aortic dissection observed during follow-up. There were no significant differences in reoperation or mortality outcomes between the AVR-only and AVR-AR cohorts. Age, aortic dimension or a combination thereof was not associated with better or worse outcomes after each AVR-AR compared with AVR.ConclusionsWe conclude AVR-only and AVR-AR surgery have low morbidity and mortality and have utility over a wide range of age and aortic sizes. Our results do not provide support for the 45-mm aortic dimension recommended in the current guidelines for aortic resection while performing AVR or any other specific dimension.
Project description:ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the role of wall shear stress (WSS) as a predictor of ascending aorta (AAo) growth at 5 years or greater follow-up.BackgroundAortic 4-dimensional flow cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can quantify regions exposed to high WSS, a known stimulus for arterial wall dysfunction. However, its association with longitudinal changes in aortic dilation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is unknown.MethodsThis retrospective study identified 72 patients with BAV (age 45 ± 12 years) who underwent CMR for surveillance of aortic dilation at baseline and ≥5 years of follow-up. Four-dimensional flow CMR analysis included the calculation of WSS heat maps to compare regional WSS in individual patients with population averages of healthy age- and sex-matched subjects (database of 136 controls). The relative areas of the AAo and aorta (in %) exposed to elevated WSS (outside the 95% CI of healthy population averages) were quantified.ResultsAt a median follow-up duration of 6.0 years, the mean AAo growth rate was 0.24 ± 0.20 mm/y. The fraction of the AAo exposed to elevated WSS at baseline was increased for patients with higher growth rates (>0.24 mm/y, n = 32) compared with those with growth rates <0.24 mm/y (19.9% [IQR: 10.2%-25.5%] vs 5.7% [IQR: 1.5%-21.3%]; P = 0.008). Larger areas of elevated WSS in the AAo and entire aorta were associated with higher rates of AAo dilation >0.24 mm/y (odds ratio: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.05-2.17; P = 0.026 and odds ratio: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.01-3.15; P = 0.046, respectively).ConclusionsThe area of elevated AAo WSS as assessed by 4-dimensional flow CMR identified BAV patients with higher rates of aortic dilation and thus might determine which patients require closer follow-up.
Project description:BackgroundBiological valve prostheses in rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement (RD AVR) procedures have demonstrated excellent outcomes. However, previous studies indicate a lack of specific surgical outcomes for the bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) or recommend RD AVR implementation. The existing literature comparing the clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of patients with BAV and those with tricuspid aortic valves (TAVs) after RD AVR is limited. Therefore, this study evaluated the safety and feasibility of RD AVR in BAV, including Sievers type 0, and compared the early clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of patients who underwent RD AVR at a single center based on aortic valve type.MethodsOur institution officially commenced performing RD AVR using Intuity valves in September 2022. The medical records of 80 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) between September 1, 2022, and July 31, 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. In this set, 30 patients underwent RD AVR for aortic stenosis. Among the 30 RD AVR cases, groups A and B comprised 16 (53.3%) patients with TAV and 14 (46.7%) with BAV, respectively. The preoperative characteristics and postoperative echocardiographic data were compared between the two groups.ResultsNo statistically significant differences in preoperative characteristics, including mean age and sex distribution, were found between groups A and B. Notably, no patient in both groups exhibited mild- or higher-grade aortic regurgitation. The postoperative transvalvular mean pressure gradients showed significantly lower values in group B than in group A (12.20±4.64 vs. 16.26±5.49 mmHg, P=0.03). The necessity to insert a permanent pacemaker was not found in any of the patients (0%) in group A but was found in one (7.1%) patient in group B (P=0.46). Among the BAV cases, six (20%) were categorized as Sievers type 0. Of the 14 patients in group B, six with Sievers type 0 and the remaining eight with other bicuspid valve types were designated as groups B0 and B1, respectively. Similarly, no significant difference in postoperative transvalvular mean pressure gradient was observed between the two groups (11.33±4.49 vs. 12.86±4.94 mmHg, P=0.56). No in-hospital mortality was observed among all 30 patients.ConclusionsIn this study, RD AVR was considered feasible in a small, carefully selected cohort of patients with aortic stenosis, even in BAV, including Sievers type 0, as observed from the standpoint of postoperative hemodynamic outcomes and the incidence of aortic regurgitation.