Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Short-term learning effect of ChatGPT on pharmacy students' learning.


ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Students in pharmacy are positive towards integrating artificial intelligence and ChatGPT into their practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the direct short-term learning effect of using Chat GPT by pharmacy students.

Methods

This was an experimental randomized study. Students were allocated into two groups; the intervention group (n = 15) used all study tools and ChatGPT, while the control group (n = 16) used all study tools, except ChatGPT. Differences between groups was measured by how well they performed on a knowledge test before and after a short study period.

Results

No significant difference was found between the intervention and control groups in level of competence in the pretest score (p = 0.28). There was also no significant effect of using ChatGPT, with a mean adjusted difference of 0.5 points on a 12-point scale. However there was a trend towards a higher proportion of ChatGPT participants having a large (at least four point) increase in score (4 out of 15) vs control group (1 out of 16).

Conclusion

There is a potential for positive effects of ChatGPT on learning outcomes in pharmacy students, however the current study was underpowered to measure a statistically significant effect of ChatGPT on short term learning.

SUBMITTER: Svendsen K 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11321390 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Short-term learning effect of ChatGPT on pharmacy students' learning.

Svendsen Kristian K   Askar Mohsen M   Umer Danial D   Halvorsen Kjell H KH  

Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy 20240723


<h4>Introduction</h4>Students in pharmacy are positive towards integrating artificial intelligence and ChatGPT into their practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the direct short-term learning effect of using Chat GPT by pharmacy students.<h4>Methods</h4>This was an experimental randomized study. Students were allocated into two groups; the intervention group (<i>n</i> = 15) used all study tools and ChatGPT, while the control group (<i>n</i> = 16) used all study tools, except ChatGPT.  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5343119 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3890858 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC9714125 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10801607 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11906709 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9230435 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11446069 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10152630 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5539215 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC10692703 | biostudies-literature