Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Outcomes of percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy in an Australian Quaternary Intensive Care Unit: An entropy-balanced retrospective study.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Studies comparing percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) and surgical tracheostomy (ST) complications in the critically ill patient population with high acuity, complexity, and severity of illness are sparse. This study evaluated the outcomes of elective PT versus ST in such patients managed at a quaternary referral center.

Aims

The primary aim was to detect a difference in hospital mortality between the two techniques. The secondary aims were to compare Intensive Care Unit (ICU) mortality, complications (including stoma site, tracheostomy-related, and decannulation complications), ICU and hospital length of stay, and time to decannulation.

Methods

This was a single-center retrospective observational study of ICU admission from August 2018 to August 2021. Patients were included if an elective tracheostomy was performed during their ICU admission. Patients with a pre-existing tracheostomy and those who underwent an obligatory tracheostomy requirement (e.g. total laryngectomy) were excluded. Cohorts were matched using Hainmueller's entropy balancing. Binary data were evaluated using logistic regression and continuous data with ordinary least squares regression.

Results

349 patients with a tracheostomy were managed in the ICU during the observation period. They were predominantly males (75% in PT; 67% in ST), with a mean age in the PT and ST group of (47; SD = 18) and (55; SD = 16), respectively. After exclusion, 135 patients remained, with 63 in the PT group and 72 in the ST group. Patients receiving ST were significantly older with a higher Body Mass Index (BMI) than the PT group. There were no significant differences in gender, Acute Physiological And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III, and the Australian and New Zealand Risk Of Death (ANZROD) between the two groups. There was no difference in hospital mortality between groups (OR 0.91, CI 0.26-3.18, p = 0.88). There were also no differences in ICU mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay, and time to decannulation. PT was associated with a greater likelihood of complications (OR 4.19; 95% CI 1.73-10.13; p < 0.01). PT was associated with a greater risk of complications in those who had this performed early (<10 days of intubation) as well as late (>10 days of intubation).

Conclusions

Percutaneous tracheostomy was associated with higher complications compared to surgical tracheostomy. They were related to tracheostomy cuff deflation, stomal site bleeding and infection, sputum plugging, and accidental and failed decannulation. These findings have identified opportunities to improve patient outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Devanand NA 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11366180 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Outcomes of percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy in an Australian Quaternary Intensive Care Unit: An entropy-balanced retrospective study.

Devanand Nilesh Anand NA   Thiruvenkatarajan Venkatesan V   Liu Wai-Man WM   Sirisinghe Isuru I   Court-Kowalski Stefan S   Pryor Lee L   Gatley Anne A   Sethi Sandeep S   Sundararajan Krishnaswamy K  

Journal of the Intensive Care Society 20240318 3


<h4>Background</h4>Studies comparing percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) and surgical tracheostomy (ST) complications in the critically ill patient population with high acuity, complexity, and severity of illness are sparse. This study evaluated the outcomes of elective PT versus ST in such patients managed at a quaternary referral center.<h4>Aims</h4>The primary aim was to detect a difference in hospital mortality between the two techniques. The secondary aims were to compare Intensive Care Unit (IC  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8411160 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8411154 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11813018 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2583967 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1550905 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10436438 | biostudies-literature
| PRJNA561526 | ENA
| S-EPMC6206638 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1065029 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7267757 | biostudies-literature