Dataset Information

Residues in substrate proteins that interact with GroEL in the capture process are buried in the native state.

ABSTRACT: We have used a bioinformatic approach to predict the natural substrate proteins for the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL based on two simple criteria. Natural substrate proteins should contain binding motifs similar in sequence to the mobile loop peptide of GroES that displaces the binding motif during the chaperonin cycle. Secondly, each substrate protein should contain multiple copies of the binding motif so that the chaperonin can perform "work" on the substrate protein. To validate these criteria, we have used a database of 252 proteins that have been experimentally shown to interact with the chaperonin machinery in vivo. More than 80% are identified by these criteria. The binding motifs of all 79 proteins in the database with a known three-dimensional structure are buried (<50% solvent-accessible surface area) in the native state. Our results show that the binding motifs are inaccessible in the native state but become solvent-exposed in unfolded state, thus enabling GroEL to distinguish between unfolded and native states. The structures of the binding motif in the native states of the substrate proteins include alpha-helices, beta-strands, and random coils. The diversity of secondary structures implies that there are large and varied conformational transitions in the recognition motifs after their displacement by the mobile loops of GroES.

SUBMITTER: Stan G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC1450189 | biostudies-literature | 2006 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Residues in substrate proteins that interact with GroEL in the capture process are buried in the native state.

Stan George G Brooks Bernard R BR Lorimer George H GH Thirumalai D D

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 20060314 12

We have used a bioinformatic approach to predict the natural substrate proteins for the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL based on two simple criteria. Natural substrate proteins should contain binding motifs similar in sequence to the mobile loop peptide of GroES that displaces the binding motif during the chaperonin cycle. Secondly, each substrate protein should contain multiple copies of the binding motif so that the chaperonin can perform "work" on the substrate protein. To validate these cr ...[more]

PMID: 16537402

Similar Datasets

Project description:The role of pH in regulating biological activity is ubiquitous, and understanding pH-mediated activity has traditionally relied on analyzing static biomolecular structures of highly populated ground states solved near physiological pH. However, recent advances have shown the increasing importance of transiently populated states, the characterization of which is extremely challenging but made plausible with the development of techniques such as relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy. To unlock the pH dependence of these transient states with atomistic-level details, we applied the recently developed explicit solvent constant pH molecular dynamics (CPHMD(MSλD)) framework to a series of staphylococcal nuclease (SNase) mutants with buried ionizable residues and probed their dynamics in different pH environments. Among our key findings is the existence of open states in all SNase mutants containing "buried" residues with highly shifted pKa's, where local solvation around the protonation site was observed. The calculated pKa demonstrated good agreement with experimental pKa's, with a low average unsigned error of 1.3 pKa units and correlation coefficient R(2) = 0.78. Sampling both open and closed states in their respective pH range, where they are expected to be dominant, was necessary to reproduce experimental pKa's, and in the most extreme examples of pKa shifts measured, it can be interpreted that the open-state structures are transient at physiological pH, contributing a small population of 1-2%. This suggests that buried ionizable residues can trigger conformational fluctuations that may be observed as transient-state structures at physiological pH. Furthermore, the coupled relationship of both open and closed states and their role in recapitulating macroscopic experimental observables suggest that structural analysis of buried residues may benefit from looking at structural pairs, as opposed to the conventional approach of looking at a single static ground-state conformation.

Project description:The double ring-shaped chaperonin GroEL binds a wide range of non-native polypeptides within its central cavity and, together with its cofactor GroES, assists their folding in an ATP-dependent manner. The conformational cycle of GroEL/ES has been studied extensively but little is known about how the environment in the central cavity affects substrate conformation. Here, we use the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein VHL as a model substrate for studying the action of the GroEL/ES system on a bound polypeptide. Fluorescent labeling of pairs of sites on VHL for fluorescence (Förster) resonant energy transfer (FRET) allows VHL to be used to explore how GroEL binding and GroEL/ES/nucleotide binding affect the substrate conformation. On average, upon binding to GroEL, all pairs of labeling sites experience compaction relative to the unfolded protein while single-molecule FRET distributions show significant heterogeneity. Upon addition of GroES and ATP to close the GroEL cavity, on average further FRET increases occur between the two hydrophobic regions of VHL, accompanied by FRET decreases between the N- and C-termini. This suggests that ATP- and GroES-induced confinement within the GroEL cavity remodels bound polypeptides by causing expansion (or racking) of some regions and compaction of others, most notably, the hydrophobic core. However, single-molecule observations of the specific FRET changes for individual proteins at the moment of ATP/GroES addition reveal that a large fraction of the population shows the opposite behavior; that is, FRET decreases between the hydrophobic regions and FRET increases for the N- and C-termini. Our time-resolved single-molecule analysis reveals the underlying heterogeneity of the action of GroES/EL on a bound polypeptide substrate, which might arise from the random nature of the specific binding to the various identical subunits of GroEL, and might help explain why multiple rounds of binding and hydrolysis are required for some chaperonin substrates.

Dataset Information

Residues in substrate proteins that interact with GroEL in the capture process are buried in the native state.

Publications

Residues in substrate proteins that interact with GroEL in the capture process are buried in the native state.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets