Dataset Information

Duloxetine versus placebo for the treatment of women with stress predominant urinary incontinence in Taiwan: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

This manuscript compares the efficacy and safety of duloxetine with placebo in Taiwanese women with SUI.

Methods

Taiwanese women with SUI were were randomly assigned to placebo (n = 61) or duloxetine 80 mg/day (n = 60) in this double-blind, 8-week, placebo-controlled study. Outcome variables included: incontinence episode frequency (IEF), Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire (I-QOL) scores, and Patient Global Impression of Improvement rating (PGI-I).

Results

Decrease in IEF was significantly greater in duloxetine-treated than placebo-treated women (69.98% vs 42.56%, P < .001). No treatment differences in I-QOL scores were significant. There were significant differences in PGI-I rating. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were experienced by more duloxetine-treated than placebo-treated women (80.0% vs 44.3%; P < .001). Discontinuations due to adverse events were significantly greater for duloxetine-treated than placebo-treated women (26.7% vs 6.6%; P = .003).

Conclusion

Data provide evidence for the safety and efficacy of duloxetine for the treatment for Taiwanese women with SUI.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00475358.

SUBMITTER: Lin AT

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2266773 | biostudies-literature | 2008 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Duloxetine versus placebo for the treatment of women with stress predominant urinary incontinence in Taiwan: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Lin Alex Tong-Long AT Sun Mou-Jong MJ Tai Hui-Lung HL Chuang Yao Chi YC Huang Shih-Tsung ST Wang Nick N Zhao Yan Daniel YD Beyrer Julie J Wulster-Radcliffe Meghan M Levine Louise L Chang Curtis C Viktrup Lars L

BMC urology 20080125

<h4>Background</h4>This manuscript compares the efficacy and safety of duloxetine with placebo in Taiwanese women with SUI.<h4>Methods</h4>Taiwanese women with SUI were were randomly assigned to placebo (n = 61) or duloxetine 80 mg/day (n = 60) in this double-blind, 8-week, placebo-controlled study. Outcome variables included: incontinence episode frequency (IEF), Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire (I-QOL) scores, and Patient Global Impression of Improvement rating (PGI-I).<h4>Results</h ...[more]

PMID: 18221532

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionFibromyalgia is characterized by widespread pain and is often accompanied by accessory symptoms. There are limited treatment options for this condition in Japan. Therefore, we conducted a phase III study to assess the efficacy and safety of duloxetine in Japanese patients with fibromyalgia.MethodsThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial was conducted in Japan. Outpatients who met the American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for fibromyalgia and whose Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) average pain score was ≥4 were randomized to duloxetine 60 mg or placebo once daily for 14 weeks. The primary efficacy measure was the change in the BPI average pain score from baseline. Secondary efficacy, quality of life (QoL), and safety outcomes were also evaluated. Mixed-effects model repeated-measures (MMRM) analysis and last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis of covariance were used to evaluate the primary efficacy measure.ResultsOverall, 393 patients were randomized to receive either duloxetine (n = 196) or placebo (n = 197). The MMRM analysis revealed no significant difference between duloxetine and placebo regarding the change in BPI average pain scores at week 14. Based on LOCF analysis, a statistically significant improvement in the change in BPI average pain scores at week 14 was observed for patients treated with duloxetine compared with placebo. Duloxetine treatment was associated with improved outcomes in nearly all secondary and post hoc analyses. The treatment was generally well tolerated. Somnolence, nausea, and constipation were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events in the duloxetine group. The discontinuation rates due to treatment-emergent adverse events were similar in both groups.ConclusionsAlthough the MMRM analysis did not demonstrate superiority of duloxetine over placebo, duloxetine treatment was associated with improved outcomes in secondary and post hoc analyses of the mean change in the BPI average pain score and most of the secondary outcomes, including analgesia and QoL. Duloxetine treatment was safe and well tolerated. These results suggest that duloxetine treatment could be associated with improvements in pain relief and QoL in Japanese patients with fibromyalgia.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01552057 . Registered 9 March 2012.

Project description:BackgroundFebrile Urinary Tract Infection (FUTI) is frequently treated initially with intravenous antibiotics, followed by oral antibiotics guided by clinical response and bacterial susceptibility patterns. Due to increasing infection rates with multiresistant Enterobacteriaceae, antibiotic options for stepdown treatment decline and patients more frequently require continued intravenous antibiotic treatment for FUTI. Fosfomycin is an antibiotic with high bactericidal activity against Escherichia coli and current resistance rates are low in most countries. Oral Fosfomycin-Trometamol 3000 mg (FT) reaches appropriate antibiotic concentrations in urine and blood and is considered safe. As such, it is a potential alternative for stepdown treatment.MethodsThe FORECAST study (Fosfomycin Randomized controlled trial for E.coli urinary tract infections as Alternative Stepdown Treatment) is a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, non-inferiority trial in which 240 patients will be randomly allocated to a stepdown treatment with FT or ciprofloxacin (standard of care) for FUTI, caused by Escherichia coli with in vitro susceptibility to both antibiotics. The study population consists of consenting female patients (≥18 years) with community acquired E. coli FUTI. After intravenous antibiotic treatment during at least 48 (but less than 120) hours, and if eligibility criteria for iv-oral switch are met, patients receive either FT (3 g every 24 h) or ciprofloxacin (500 mg every 12 h) for a total antibiotic duration of 10 days. The primary endpoint is clinical cure (resolution of symptoms) 6-10 days post-treatment. Secondary endpoints are microbiological cure 6-10 days post-treatment, clinical cure, mortality, ICU admittance, relapse, reinfection, readmission, additional antibiotic use for UTI, early study discontinuation, adverse events, days of hospitalization and days of absenteeism within 30-35 days post-treatment. The sample size is based on achieving non-inferiority on the primary endpoint, applying a non-inferiority margin of 10%, a two-sided p-value of < 0.05 and a power of 80%.DiscussionThe study aims to demonstrate non-inferiority of oral fosfomycin, compared to oral ciprofloxacin, in the stepdown treatment of E. coli FUTI.Trial registrationRegistered at the Nederlands trial register (Dutch trial register) on 4-10-2017.Trial registration numberNTR6449 . Secondary ID (national authority): NL60186.041.17.

Project description:ObjectiveTo confirm if mirabegron 50 mg shows efficacy in women with overactive bladder and either urgency urinary incontinence or mixed urinary incontinence versus placebo.MethodsPost-hoc analyses were carried out using pooled data from a Japanese phase IIb and a phase III study. The primary efficacy end-point was baseline to end-of-treatment change in the mean number of micturitions/24 h. The secondary end-points were changes in the mean voided volume/micturition, mean number of urgency and incontinence episodes/24 h, and mean number of nocturia episodes/night. Other end-points were quality of life and incontinence normalization rates.ResultsWomen with urgency urinary incontinence (placebo n = 204, mirabegron n = 214) and mixed urinary incontinence (placebo n = 122, mirabegron n = 139) were included. Change in mean micturitions/24 h at end-of-treatment for mirabegron was statistically significant versus placebo in both populations; the effect size increased over time. For all secondary end-points, median changes for mirabegron were statistically significant versus placebo at end-of-treatment, except for nocturia for the urgency urinary incontinence population and urgency for the mixed urinary incontinence population. Mirabegron showed larger improvements versus placebo in all quality-of-life domains, except for general health perception in the urgency urinary incontinence population. Incontinence normalization rates for mirabegron were 47.2% and 49.6% in the urgency urinary incontinence and mixed urinary incontinence populations, respectively, versus 42.6% and 39.3% for placebo.ConclusionsMirabegron 50 mg significantly improved key overactive bladder symptoms versus placebo in women with urgency urinary incontinence, and it also improved most overactive bladder symptoms, including micturition frequency, in patients with mixed urinary incontinence. These findings support the benefits of using mirabegron in the female overactive bladder wet population.

Project description:ObjectivesTo estimate the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation to reduce urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes.DesignPilot, two-arm, randomized trial conducted from 2013 to 2017. Interventions were 12 weeks of weekly oral 50,000 IU vitamin D3 or placebo.SettingAcademic, university-based outpatient clinic.ParticipantsCommunity-dwelling postmenopausal women, 50 years or older, with at least three UUI episodes on 7-day bladder diary and serum vitamin 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) of 30 ng/mL or less.MeasurementsThe primary efficacy estimate was the percentage change in UUI episodes. Secondary estimates included changes in other lower urinary tract symptoms, along with exploratory subgroup analysis by race/ethnicity and obesity.ResultsWe randomized 56 women (aged 50-84 years; mean = 60.5 ± 8.2 years), 28 to vitamin D and 28 to placebo; 51 completed treatments. Mean serum 25(OH)D at baseline (21.2 ± 5.2 and 18.2 ± 5.6, P = .30) improved to 57.9 ± 16.3 ng/mL with vitamin D3 and 21.9 ± 8.2 ng/mL with placebo (P < .001). UUI episodes per 24-hour day decreased by 43.0% with vitamin D3 compared to 27.6% with placebo (P = .22). Among black women (n = 33), UUI episodes decreased by 63.2% with vitamin D3 compared to 22.9% with placebo (P = .03). Among obese women, UUI episodes decreased by 54.1% with vitamin D compared to 32.7% with placebo (P = .29). For all women, changes in voiding frequency (P = .40), nocturia (P = .40), urgency (P = .90), incontinence severity (P = .81), and overactive bladder symptom severity (P = .47) were not different between arms.ConclusionsPostmenopausal women with UUI and vitamin D insufficiency demonstrated a greater than 40% decrease in UUI episodes, which did not reach statistical significance compared to placebo, except in the subset of black women. The results of this pilot study support further investigation of vitamin D3 alone or in combination with other treatments for UUI, particularly for women in higher-risk subgroups. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:570-575, 2019.

Dataset Information

Duloxetine versus placebo for the treatment of women with stress predominant urinary incontinence in Taiwan: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Trial registration

Publications

Duloxetine versus placebo for the treatment of women with stress predominant urinary incontinence in Taiwan: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets