Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Treatment eligibility rates in patients with HCV monoinfection have not been directly compared with patients with HCV/HIV coinfection. These data are important for planning interventions to optimize HCV management.Method
We enrolled consecutive HCV-monoinfected and HCV/HIV-coinfected subjects presenting to hepatology and HIV clinics at three academic medical centers. Data were obtained through structured subject and provider interviews and a review of medical records.Results
Of the 399 subjects enrolled, 241 (60%) were HCV monoinfected and 158 (40%) were HCV/HIV coinfected. HCV/HIV-coinfected subjects were less likely to have indications for treatment based on HCV RNA positivity (70.9% vs. 81.3%, p = .04) but were more likely to have at least one contraindication to treatment (81.6% vs. 64.9%, p < .004). Depression and ongoing alcohol and injection drug abuse were more common in the HCV/HIV-coinfected persons. HCV/HIV-coinfected persons were less likely to undergo liver biopsy or to ever get treatment for HCV.Conclusions
HCV/HIV-coinfected persons are less likely to undergo a liver biopsy or be eligible for HCV therapy and are more likely to have treatment contraindications compared with HCV-monoinfected subjects. Strategies to address modifiable factors (e.g., depression, substance abuse) may enhance treatment eligibility in HCV-infected populations.
SUBMITTER: Butt AA
PROVIDER: S-EPMC2845454 | biostudies-literature | 2009 Jan-Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Butt Adeel A AA Khan Uzma A UA Shaikh Obaid S OS McMahon Deborah D Dorey-Stein Zachariah Z Tsevat Joel J Lo Re Vincent V
HIV clinical trials 20090101 1
<h4>Background</h4>Treatment eligibility rates in patients with HCV monoinfection have not been directly compared with patients with HCV/HIV coinfection. These data are important for planning interventions to optimize HCV management.<h4>Method</h4>We enrolled consecutive HCV-monoinfected and HCV/HIV-coinfected subjects presenting to hepatology and HIV clinics at three academic medical centers. Data were obtained through structured subject and provider interviews and a review of medical records.< ...[more]