Preventing ovarian cancer by salpingectomy.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Foulkes WD
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3671016 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Preventing ovarian cancer by salpingectomy.
Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) 20130601 3
Similar Datasets
Project description:ImportanceOpportunistic salpingectomy (OS), which is the removal of fallopian tubes during hysterectomy or instead of tubal ligation without removal of ovaries, is recommended to prevent ovarian cancer, particularly serous ovarian cancer. However, the effectiveness of OS is still undetermined.ObjectiveTo examine observed vs expected rates of ovarian cancer among individuals who have undergone OS.Design, setting, and participantsThis is a population-based, retrospective cohort study of all individuals in British Columbia, Canada, who underwent OS or a control surgery (hysterectomy alone or tubal ligation) between 2008 and 2017, with follow-up until December 31, 2017. Those with any gynecological cancer diagnosed before or within 6 months of their procedure were excluded. Data analysis was performed from April to August 2021.ExposuresRemoval of both fallopian tubes at the time of hysterectomy or instead of tubal ligation while leaving ovaries intact.Main outcomes and measuresAn ovarian cancer diagnosis listed in the British Columbia Cancer Registry. Age-specific rates of epithelial and serous ovarian cancer in the control group were combined with the specific follow-up time in the OS group to calculate expected numbers (and 95% CIs) of ovarian cancers in the OS group. These were compared with observed numbers. Age-adjusted expected and observed numbers of breast and colorectal cancers were also examined in the OS group.ResultsThere were 25 889 individuals who underwent OS (mean [SD] age, 40.2 [7.1] years; median [IQR] follow-up, 3.2 [1.6-5.1] years) and 32 080 who underwent hysterectomy alone or tubal ligation (mean [SD] age, 38.2 [7.9] years; median [IQR] follow-up, 7.3 [4.6-8.7] years). There were no serous ovarian cancers in the OS group and 5 or fewer epithelial ovarian cancers. The age-adjusted expected number was 5.27 (95% CI, 1.78-19.29) serous cancers and 8.68 (95% CI, 3.36-26.58) epithelial ovarian cancers. Age-adjusted expected vs observed numbers of breast cancers (22.1 expected vs 23 observed) and colorectal cancers (9.35 expected vs 8 observed) were not significantly different.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study, the OS group had significantly fewer serous and epithelial ovarian cancers than were expected according to the rate at which they arose in the control group. These findings suggest that OS is associated with reduced ovarian cancer risk.
| S-EPMC8829665 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceA body of pathological and clinical evidence supports the position that the fallopian tube is the site of origin for a large proportion of high-grade serous ovarian cancers. Consequently, salpingectomy is now considered for permanent contraception (in lieu of tubal ligation) or ovarian cancer prevention (performed opportunistically at the time of surgical procedures for benign gynecologic conditions).ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between salpingectomy and the risk of invasive epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer.Design, setting, and participantsThis population-based retrospective cohort study included all women aged 18 to 80 years who were eligible for health care services in Ontario, Canada. Participants were identified using administrative health databases from Ontario between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 2019. A total of 131 516 women were included in the primary (matched) analysis. Women were followed up until December 31, 2021.ExposuresSalpingectomy (with and without hysterectomy) vs no pelvic procedure (control condition) among women in the general population.Main outcomes and measuresWomen with a unilateral or bilateral salpingectomy in Ontario between April 1, 1992, and December 31, 2019, were matched 1:3 to women with no pelvic procedure from the general population. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer combined.ResultsAmong 131 516 women (mean [SD] age, 42.2 [7.6] years), 32 879 underwent a unilateral or bilateral salpingectomy, and 98 637 did not undergo a pelvic procedure. After a mean (range) follow-up of 7.4 (0-29.2) years in the salpingectomy group and 7.5 (0-29.2) years in the nonsurgical control group, there were 31 incident cancers (0.09%) and 117 incident cancers (0.12%), respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.55-1.21). The HR for cancer incidence was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.53-1.44) when comparing those with salpingectomy vs those with hysterectomy alone.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study, no association was found between salpingectomy and the risk of ovarian cancer; however, this observation was based on few incident cases and a relatively short follow-up time. Studies with additional years of follow-up are necessary to define the true level of potential risk reduction with salpingectomy, although longer follow-up will also be a challenge unless collaborative efforts that pool data are undertaken.
| S-EPMC10422181 | biostudies-literature
Project description:SignificanceThis study found that many participants were willing to consider RRS to prevent ovarian cancer. Further research on RRS should be undertaken to understand how this can be best used for ovarian cancer prevention.
| S-EPMC11780486 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo summarize published evidence supporting current strategies for the prevention of epithelial ovarian cancer in women with a genetic, elevated risk for the development of this disease, as well as the emerging data on the novel salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (SDO) strategy. Furthermore, we will explore whether salpingectomy alone is a viable risk-reducing strategy for these women. We will also discuss current national guidelines for risk-reducing surgery based on patients' individual genetic predisposition.Data sourcesMEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database, with a focus on randomized controlled trials and large prospective, observational studies.Methods of study selectionThe key search terms for our review included Medical Subject Headings: "salpingectomy," "ovarian cancer," and "risk-reducing surgery."Tabulation, integration, and resultsThe fallopian tube is now well established as the site of origin for most ovarian cancers, particularly high-grade serous carcinomas. This finding has led to the development of new preventive surgical techniques, such as SDO, which may be associated with fewer side effects. However, until the results of ongoing trials are reported and the impact of SDO on ovarian cancer risk reduction is established, it should not be recommended outside of clinical trials, and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy remains the treatment of choice for risk-reducing surgery, especially in women with a genetic, high risk for ovarian cancer.ConclusionThe decision to undergo risk-reducing surgery among women with an elevated risk for ovarian cancer should be made after comprehensive consultation and individually based on genetic predisposition, childbearing status, and personal preference.
| S-EPMC7954812 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Given the unremitting obstacles to effectively screen for and treat ovarian cancer (OC), prevention is a necessary countermeasure. The recent discovery of the fallopian tube as the origin of the most common and deadly type of OC, high grade serous cancer (HGSC), makes prevention through salpingectomy possible (Madsen et al., 2015). Opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) is the practice of removing the post-reproductive fallopian tubes at the time of other intraperitoneal surgery, or for sterilization in lieu of tubal ligation, to decrease OC risk (Falconer et al., 2015). The safety, effectiveness, and reach of OS as a primary prevention strategy depends on the knowledge mobilization of a standard surgical approach for surgeons (Hanley et al., 2017, Morelli et al., 2013). Resources for accomplishing this knowledge mobilization activity are needed. We therefore aim to create a peer-reviewed, publicly available surgical instructional video that facilitates standardization of the practice of salpingectomy for the purpose of OC prevention. Content creation was generated by a team of surgeon stakeholders, medical illustrators, instructional designers, and health education specialists. Expert gynecologic surgeons were filmed performing salpingectomy in order to build a video library. Accurate illustration and editing of live video footage was executed to support surgeons in visualizing key anatomic landmarks to ensure safe and complete fallopian tube excision. Review of eligibility criteria, fundamentals of preoperative counseling, and strategic and technical points were prioritized. This endeavor is strictly educational, with no commercial benefit. Publicly available, peer-reviewed surgical education tools will help us collaborate to safely and equitably expand OS within and beyond the current scope of surgical practice.
| S-EPMC10997886 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceMost ovarian cancers originate in the fimbriated end of the fallopian tube. This has led to the hypothesis that surgical resection of the fallopian tubes at the time of gynecologic and nongynecologic surgical procedures-referred to as an opportunistic salpingectomy-may prevent the development of epithelial ovarian cancer for women at an average risk of developing the disease.ObjectiveTo compile a comprehensive, state-of-the-science review examining the current landscape of performing bilateral salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention.Evidence reviewA systematic review of the literature was performed on March 4, 2022, to identify studies examining salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention. This review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Four databases were selected: PubMed via the National Library of Medicine's PubMed.gov, Embase via Elsevier's Embase.com, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via Wiley's Cochrane Library, and Northern Light Life Sciences Conference Abstracts via Ovid. A total of 20 gray literature sources, including 1 database, 2 registers, 1 repository, 1 index, 1 archive, 1 preprint server, 1 agency, and 12 organizations, were also searched.FindingsThe initial search produced 1089 results; a total of 158 publications were included in the final review. Salpingectomy has been associated with ovarian cancer risk reduction of approximately 80%. Studies have demonstrated that salpingectomy was safe, cost-effective, and was not associated with an earlier age of menopause onset. With widespread implementation, salpingectomy has the potential to reduce ovarian cancer mortality in the US by an estimated 15%. Both physician and patient awareness regarding the adnexa as the origin for most ovarian cancers, as well as the existence of salpingectomy and its potential benefits in reducing ovarian cancer risk, has increased during the past decade. Raising awareness and developing effective implementation strategies are essential.Conclusions and relevanceThe results of this systematic review suggest that bilateral salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention was safe and feasible and has the potential to be a cost-effective and cost-saving strategy across the population. Prospective studies to demonstrate long-term survival outcomes and feasibility in nongynecologic surgical procedures are warranted.
| S-EPMC11185162 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety and cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy (OS-the removal of the fallopian tubes) at the time of colorectal surgery to prevent ovarian cancer. Ovarian cancer is the fifth cause of cancer-related mortality in females in Canada. OS can prevent the most common and lethal type of ovarian cancer, high grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). OS during gynecologic surgery (hysterectomy or instead of tubal ligation) is safe and effective. However, rates of hysterectomies and tubal sterilization are decreasing. This research team aims to extend the prevention of ovarian cancer by expanding to offer OS during other surgeries in the pelvis where fallopian tubes are accessible, beginning with colorectal surgery. This study will examine: 1) the feasibility of OS at the time of colorectal surgery; 2) the safety of OS at the time of colorectal surgery; 3) the cost-effectiveness of OS at the time of colorectal surgery.
The hypothesis is that OS will be well accepted by individuals with fallopian tubes undergoing colorectal surgery, and that the vast majority (around 90 percent) of attempts to remove both fallopian tubes will be successful. It is expected that there will be 10-20 minutes additional operating room time for completing OS and that there will be no increased risk of complications when OS is included in a colorectal surgery. The researchers also hypothesize that OS at the time of colorectal surgery will be cost-effective because of the reduced number of ovarian cancer cases and associated treatment costs.
| 2711001 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:BackgroundOvarian cancer is the leading cause of death among gynaecological cancers. The identification of the fallopian tube epithelium as the origin of most ovarian cancers introduces a novel prevention strategy by removing the fallopian tubes during an already indicated abdominal surgery for another reason, also known as an opportunistic salpingectomy. This preventive opportunity is evidence based, recommended and established at the time of gynaecologic surgery in many countries worldwide. To expand interest among surgeons in performing a salpingectomy during non-gynaecological surgery, the aim of this review is to identify knowledge gaps during those surgeries.MethodsA scoping review was performed following the PRISMA-Scoping Review (ScR) checklist. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) database and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to November 2024. Trial registers were searched for ongoing trials. All studies reporting original data on salpingectomy during non-gynaecological surgery were included. Outcomes were provided narratively.ResultsEighteen studies were identified reporting on the implementation, surgical feasibility, patients' perspectives, physicians' knowledge and cost-effectiveness of an opportunistic salpingectomy during non-gynaecological surgery. Population-level data indicate that an opportunistic salpingectomy is rarely performed in non-gynaecological surgeries. High success rates and no complications of an opportunistic salpingectomy were observed during bariatric surgery and cholecystectomies. However, performing an additional salpingectomy appeared more time-consuming. Patients had strong interest in information on and willingness to undergo opportunistic salpingectomy. Cost-effectiveness analysis encourages opportunistic salpingectomy use, as models show reduced ovarian cancer incidence and mortality rate while being cost-effective.ConclusionsOpportunistic salpingectomy during non-gynaecologic surgery appears to be a promising method to prevent ovarian cancer. Implementing such a strategy will require education of multiple surgical disciplines, training and resolution of organizational issues.
| S-EPMC11773000 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWomen with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations have a lifetime risk of ovarian cancer of up to 46%. Opportunistic salpingectomy has been advocated as a risk-reducing strategy owing to increasing recognition of tubal origin, yet evidence of efficacy in this high-risk population is limited.CaseThis is the case of a woman with a BRCA1 mutation who underwent prophylactic mastectomy and bilateral salpingectomy with ovarian retention before the age of 40 years. She did not undergo oophorectomy and subsequently developed stage IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer 4 years after her initial surgery.ConclusionMore research is needed to determine the role of prophylactic salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy, optimal timing of completion oophorectomy, and the risks and benefits compared with up-front risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.
| S-EPMC7263355 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Pelvic surgery can affect ovarian reserve, but estimates of the potential effect of different surgical procedures are lacking. This study examines the markers of ovarian reserve after different procedures in order to help the provision of informed consent before surgery. Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) of women with a history of salpingectomy, ovarian cystectomy or unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were compared to those without history of surgery using cross-sectional data adjusting for patient and clinical factors in multivariable regression model. There were 138 women who had had salpingectomy, 36 unilateral salpingo-oopherectomy, 41 cystectomy for ovarian cysts that are other than endometrioma and 40 women had had excision of endometrioma. There was no significant difference in AMH (9 %; p = 0.33), AFC (-2 %; p = 0.59) or FSH (-14 %; p = 0.21) in women with a history of salpingectomy compared to women without surgery. Women with a history of unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were found to have significantly lower AMH (-54 %; p = 0.001). These women also had lower AFC (-28 %; p = 0.34) and higher FSH (14 %; p = 0.06), the effect of which did not reach statistical significance. The study did not find any significant associations between a history of cystectomy, for disease other than endometrioma and AMH (7 %; p = 0.62), AFC (13 %; p = 0.18) or FSH. (11 %; p = 0.16). Women with a history of cystectomy for ovarian endometrioma had 66 % lower AMH (p = 0.002). Surgery for endometrioma did not significantly affect AFC (14 %; p = 0.22) or FSH (10 %; p = 0.28). Salpingo-oopherectomy and cystectomy for endometrioma cause a significant reduction in AMH levels. Neither salpingectomy nor cystectomy for cysts other than endometrioma has appreciable effects on ovarian reserve.
| S-EPMC4949297 | biostudies-literature