Dataset Information

A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing adverse event profile and tolerability of nicergoline.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To evaluate the safety profile of nicergoline compared with placebo and other active agents from published randomised controlled trials.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis of nicergoline compared with placebo and other active agents across various indications.

Data sources

MEDLINE, Medline-in-process, Cochrane, EMBASE, EMBASE alerts, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and Cochrane Methodology Register (CMR) for all the randomised controlled trials, open-label or blinded, in adults treated with nicergoline. Studies published until August 2013 were included.

Review method

29 studies were included for data extraction. The studies included in this review were majorly from European countries and mostly in cerebrovascular disease (n=15) and dementia (n=8).

Results

The treatment withdrawals were comparatively lower in the nicergoline group as compared with the placebo group (RR=0.92; 95% CI 0.7 to 1.21) and other active comparators (RR=0.45; 95% CI 0.10 to 1.95), but the difference was non-significant. Incidence of any adverse events (AEs) was slightly higher (RR=1.05; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.2) while incidence of serious AEs was lower (RR=0.85; 95% CI 0.50 to 1.45) in the nicergoline compared with placebo group. Frequency of anxiety was significantly lower in nicergoline as compared with placebo (p=0.01). Other AEs including diarrhoea, gastric upset, dizziness and drowsiness were less frequent in the nicergoline group when compared with placebo/active drugs, but the difference was non-significant. Frequency of hypotension and hot flushes was slightly higher in the nicergoline group but the difference was non-significant. None of the studies reported any incidence of fibrosis or ergotism with nicergoline treatment.

Conclusions

Nicergoline is an ergot derivative, but its safety profile is better than other ergot derivatives like ergotamine and ergotoxine. This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that nicergoline has a good safety profile. None of the studies included in this systematic review reported any incidence of fibrosis or ergotism with nicergoline.

SUBMITTER: Fioravanti M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4120366 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing adverse event profile and tolerability of nicergoline.

Fioravanti Mario M Nakashima Taku T Xu Jun J Garg Amit A

BMJ open 20140730 7

<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate the safety profile of nicergoline compared with placebo and other active agents from published randomised controlled trials.<h4>Design</h4>Systematic review and meta-analysis of nicergoline compared with placebo and other active agents across various indications.<h4>Data sources</h4>MEDLINE, Medline-in-process, Cochrane, EMBASE, EMBASE alerts, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and Cochrane Method ...[more]

PMID: 25079927

Similar Datasets

Project description:Biliary and pancreatic diseases are common in the elderly; however, few studies have addressed the occurrence of adverse events in elderly patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Our objective was to determine the incidence rates of specific adverse events in this group and calculate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for selected comparison groups.Bibliographical searches were conducted in Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases. The studies included documented the incidence of adverse events (perforation, pancreatitis, bleeding, cholangitis, cardiopulmonary adverse events, mortality) in patients aged ≥ 65 who underwent ERCP. Pooled incidence rates were calculated for each reported adverse event and IRRs were determined for available comparison groups. A parallel analysis was performed in patients aged ≥ 80 and ≥ 90.Our literature search yielded 7429 articles, of which 69 studies met our inclusion criteria. Pooled incidence rates for adverse events (per 1000 ERCPs) in patients aged ≥ 65 were as follows: perforation 3.8 (95 %CI 1.8 - 7.0), pancreatitis 13.1 (95 %CI 11.0 - 15.5), bleeding 7.7 (95 %CI 5.7 - 10.1), cholangitis 16.1 (95 %CI 11.7 - 21.7), cardiopulmonary events 3.7 (95 %CI 1.5 - 7.6), and death 7.1 (95 %CI 5.2 - 9.4). Patients ≥ 65 had lower rates of pancreatitis (IRR 0.3, 95 %CI 0.3 - 0.4) compared with younger patients. Octogenarians had higher rates of death (IRR 2.4, 95 %CI 1.3 - 4.5) compared with younger patients, whereas nonagenarians had increased rates of bleeding (IRR 2.4, 95 %CI 1.1 - 5.2), cardiopulmonary events (IRR 3.7, 95 %CI 1.0 - 13.9), and death (IRR 3.8, 95 %CI 1.0 - 14.4). Conclusions ERCP appears to be safe in elderly patients, except in the very elderly who are at higher risk of some adverse events. These data on adverse event rates can help to inform clinical decision-making, the consent process, and comparative effectiveness analyses.

Project description:IntroductionAdverse drug events (ADEs) pose a significant challenge in current clinical practice. Machine learning (ML) has been increasingly used to predict specific ADEs using electronic health record (EHR) data. This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the application of ML in predicting specific ADEs based on EHR data.MethodsA systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and IEEE Xplore was conducted to identify relevant articles published from the inception to 20 May 2024. Studies that developed ML models for predicting specific ADEs or ADEs associated with particular drugs were included using EHR data.ResultsA total of 59 studies met the inclusion criteria, covering 15 drugs and 15 ADEs. In total, 38 machine learning algorithms were reported, with random forest (RF) being the most frequently used, followed by support vector machine (SVM), eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), decision tree (DT), and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM). The performance of the ML models was generally strong, with an average area under the curve (AUC) of 76.68% ± 10.73, accuracy of 76.00% ± 11.26, precision of 60.13% ± 24.81, sensitivity of 62.35% ± 20.19, specificity of 75.13% ± 16.60, and an F1 score of 52.60% ± 21.10. The combined sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and AUC from the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve using a random effects model were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.65-0.66), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.89-0.90), 12.11 (95% CI: 8.17-17.95), and 0.8069, respectively. The risk factors associated with different drugs and ADEs varied.DiscussionFuture research should focus on improving standardization, conducting multicenter studies that incorporate diverse data types, and evaluating the impact of artificial intelligence predictive models in real-world clinical settings.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024565842, identifier CRD42024565842.

Project description:BackgroundCarfilzomib is a second-generation proteasome inhibitor (PI) used for combination therapy with dexamethasone and/or lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Reports indicate that PIs have a unique toxicity profile that includes thrombocytopenia as a hematologic adverse event; however, its occurrence has not yet been quantified systematically.ObjectivesThe main objective of our systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the incidence of thrombocytopenia in patients with multiple myeloma after treatment with carfilzomib.DesignSelection of studies and meta-analysis of trials was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.Data sources and methodsTwo investigators performed an independent literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, SciFinder, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, as well as the US and EU clinical trials registries. The cumulative incidence and overall relative risk were calculated with the random effect model using RevMan and R statistical software.ResultsThe analysis included a total of 9237 patients, 2516 patients in single-arm studies and 6721 patients in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A total of 47 studies were included; among these, 14 were RCTs. Analysis of currently available data showed that treatment with carfilzomib may increase the incidence of all-grade thrombocytopenia, and this correlated with the dose used. With supportive therapy alone, the incidence is 26%. The addition of carfilzomib to the treatment results in a 37% increase in incidence, whereas with bortezomib, the increase is slightly lower at 34%. Surprisingly, when treatment with carfilzomib and bortezomib was compared, bortezomib was found to be more likely to exacerbate high-grade thrombocytopenia (7%) than carfilzomib (3%).ConclusionClarification of these associations suggests that clinicians should be aware of the potential risk of high-grade thrombocytopenia occurring and monitor patients closely to take appropriate measures.Trial registrationRegistered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42022314378.

Dataset Information

A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing adverse event profile and tolerability of nicergoline.

Objective

Design

Data sources

Review method

Results

Conclusions

Publications

A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing adverse event profile and tolerability of nicergoline.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets