Dataset Information

The prevalence of mental health disorders in (ex-)military personnel with a physical impairment: a systematic review.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Having a visual, hearing or physical impairment (defined as problems in body function or structure) may adversely influence the mental well-being of military personnel. This paper reviews the existing literature regarding the prevalence of mental health problems among (ex-)military personnel who have a permanent, predominantly, physical impairment.

Method

Multiple electronic literature databases were searched for relevant studies (EMBASE (1980-January 2014), MEDLINE (1946-January 2014), PsycINFO (2002-January 2014), Web of Science (1975-January 2014)).

Results

25 papers were included in the review, representing 17 studies. Studies conducted among US military personnel (n=8) were most represented. A range of mental health disorders were investigated; predominately post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but also depression, anxiety disorder (excluding PTSD), psychological distress and alcohol misuse. The findings indicate that mental health disorders including PTSD (range 2-59%), anxiety (range 16.1-35.5%), depression (range 9.7-46.4%) and psychological distress (range 13.4-36%) are frequently found whereby alcohol misuse was least common (range 2.2-26.2%).

Conclusions

Common mental health disorders were frequently identified among (ex-)military personnel with a physical impairment. Adequate care and support is necessary during the impairment adaptation process to facilitate the psychosocial challenges (ex-)military personnel with an impairment face. Future research should be directed into factors impacting on the mental well-being of (ex-)military personnel with an impairment, how prevalence rates vary across impairment types and to identify and act on specific needs for care and support.

SUBMITTER: Stevelink SA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4392233 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The prevalence of mental health disorders in (ex-)military personnel with a physical impairment: a systematic review.

Stevelink S A M SA Malcolm E M EM Mason C C Jenkins S S Sundin J J Fear N T NT

Occupational and environmental medicine 20140916 4

<h4>Background</h4>Having a visual, hearing or physical impairment (defined as problems in body function or structure) may adversely influence the mental well-being of military personnel. This paper reviews the existing literature regarding the prevalence of mental health problems among (ex-)military personnel who have a permanent, predominantly, physical impairment.<h4>Method</h4>Multiple electronic literature databases were searched for relevant studies (EMBASE (1980-January 2014), MEDLINE (19 ...[more]

PMID: 25227569

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsProvision and need for mental health services among military personnel are a major concern across nations. Two recent comparisons suggest higher rates of mental disorders in US and UK military personnel compared with civilians. However, these findings may not apply to other nations. Previous studies have focused on the overall effects of military service rather than the separate effects of military service and deployment. This study compared German military personnel with and without a history of deployment to sociodemographically matched civilians regarding prevalence and severity of 12-month DSM-IV mental disorders.Method1439 deployed soldiers (DS), 779 never deployed soldiers (NS) and 1023 civilians were assessed with an adapted version of the Munich Composite International Diagnostic interview across the same timeframe. Data were weighted using propensity score methodology to assure comparability of the three samples.ResultsCompared with adjusted civilians, the prevalence of any 12-month disorder was lower in NS (OR: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.5-0.99) and did not differ in DS. Significant differences between military personnel and civilians regarding prevalence and severity of individual diagnoses were only apparent for alcohol (DS: OR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1-0.6; NS: OR: 0.2, 95% CI: 0.1-0.6) and nicotine dependence (DS: OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.6; NS: OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.7) with lower values in both military samples. Elevated rates of panic/agoraphobia (OR: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.4-5.3) and posttraumatic stress disorder (OR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.3-8.0) were observed in DS with high combat exposure compared with civilians.ConclusionsRates and severity of mental disorders in the German military are comparable with civilians for internalising and lower for substance use disorders. A higher risk of some disorders is reduced to DS with high combat exposure. This finding has implications for mental health service provision and the need for targeted interventions. Differences to previous US and UK studies that suggest an overall higher prevalence in military personnel might result from divergent study methods, deployment characteristics, military structures and occupational factors. Some of these factors might yield valuable targets to improve military mental health.

Project description:IntroductionThe military is a unique cultural institution that significantly influences its members, contributing to the development and transformation of their identities. Despite growing interest in identity research in the military, challenges persist in the conceptualization of military identity, including understanding how it forms, assessing the influence of military culture on identity development, and evaluating the implications for mental health. The primary objective of this scoping review was to map the complexities of military culture's impact on military identity and its effects on mental health.Materials and methodsA scoping review of the literature was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute Scoping Review Methodology. Studies were included if they described military culture, military identity, and mental health, resulting in 65 eligible studies. The extracted data were thematically analyzed to identify how military culture impacts military identity and mental health and well-being.ResultsMultiple identities were evident within the military population, with 2 overarching identities, loyalty and military, overall conferring positive mental health outcomes. Where these identities were hidden or disrupted, poorer mental health outcomes were observed.ConclusionsThe scoping review conducted in this study challenges the notion of military identity as a singular concept promoting positive mental health outcomes. It highlights its multifaceted nature, revealing that individuals may face identity concealment and disruptions during periods of transition or adjustment, resulting in adverse mental health outcomes. To capture the complexity of military identity, the authors developed the Military Identity Model (MIM). Military leaders, policymakers, and health care professionals are encouraged to recognize the complex nature of military identity and its impact on mental health and well-being. We recommend using the Military Identity Model to explore military identity and adjustment-related difficulties.

Project description:ImportanceUnderstanding how the active duty military population's mental health care use is associated with local military and civilian psychiatrist capacity is critical in designing the optimal allocation of mental health resources from both sectors to improve the mental health of military personnel.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether the probability of mental health care visits by military personnel changes when psychiatrist capacity changes in their communities, when capacity is measured separately for military treatment facilities and civilian sectors.Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study of active duty US military service members between January 1, 2016, and September 30, 2020, combines data from the Defense Health Agency, the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System, and the US Census. Data were collected and analyzed from June 2022 to July 2023.Main outcomes and measuresThe main outcome was the probability of making at least 1 mental health care visit in a given quarter at military treatment facilities and in civilian settings. Linear probability models with 2-dimensional fixed effects at individual and community levels were implemented to estimate changes in individual outcomes when community psychiatrist capacity changed.ResultsThis study includes 1 958 421 US service members (83% men; mean [SD] age at baseline, 28.4 [8.0] years). Thirteen percent of service members did not have military treatment facility psychiatrists available within a 30-minute driving time, and 66% lived in communities with a psychiatrist shortage (<1 psychiatrist per 20 000 relevant population), while 9% lived in communities with high (>3 psychiatrists per 20 000 relevant population) military treatment facility psychiatrist capacity. Five percent of service members lived in communities with no civilian psychiatrists within a 30-minute driving time, while 66% lived in communities with high civilian psychiatrist capacity. The mean quarterly mental health care visit rates to military treatment facilities and civilian settings were 7% and 2%, respectively. The probability of a mental health care visit to a military treatment facility increased by 0.95 percentage points (95% CI, 0.79-1.10 percentage points; equivalent to 14%) when the individual experienced a change in military treatment facility capacity from no psychiatrist to high capacity. The probability of a mental health care visit to a civilian setting increased by 0.57 percentage points (95% CI, 0.38-0.76 percentage points; equivalent to 32%) when civilian capacity changed from no psychiatrist to high capacity. The magnitude of responses to military treatment facility capacity changes remained similar in communities that already had high civilian capacity.Conclusions and relevanceThis cohort study of the US military population suggests that active duty military personnel rely largely on military treatment facilities for their mental health care and that there are meaningful responses to military treatment facility psychiatrist capacity changes even in communities with high civilian psychiatric capacity. Realigning military treatment facility psychiatrists across communities with shortages and high-capacity military treatment facilities, as well as addressing nongeographical barriers in the civilian sector, remain critical to achieve the optimal balance between military and civilian care provision.

Dataset Information

The prevalence of mental health disorders in (ex-)military personnel with a physical impairment: a systematic review.

Background

Method

Results

Conclusions

Publications

The prevalence of mental health disorders in (ex-)military personnel with a physical impairment: a systematic review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets