Project description:BACKGROUND:Spinal cord and brain stem lesions require a judicious approach with an optimized trajectory due to a clustering of functions on their surfaces. Intraoperative mapping helps locate function. To confidently locate such lesions, neuronavigation alone lacks the desired accuracy and is of limited use in the spinal cord. OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the clinical value of fluoresceins for initial delineation of such critically located lesions. METHODS:We evaluated fluorescein guidance in the surgical resection of lesions with blood-brain barrier disruption demonstrating contrast enhancement in magnet resonance imaging in the spinal cord and in the brain stem in 3 different patients. Two patients harbored a diffuse cervical and thoracic spinal cord lesion, respectively. Another patient suffered metastatic lesions in the brain stem and at the floor of the fourth ventricle. Low-dose fluorescein (4 mg/kg body weight) was applied after anesthesia induction and visualized using the Zeiss Pentero 900 Yellow560 filter (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). RESULTS:Fluorescein was helpful for locating lesions and for defining the best possible trajectory. During resection, however, we found unspecific propagation of fluorescein within the brain stem up to 6 mm within 3 h after application. As these lesions were otherwise distinguishable from surrounding tissue, monitoring resection was not an issue. CONCLUSION:Fluorescein guidance is a feasible tool for defining surgical entry zones when aiming for surgical removal of spinal cord and brain stem lesions. Unselective fluorescein extravasation cautions against using such methodology for monitoring completeness of resection. Providing the right timing, a window of pseudoselectivity could increase fluoresceins' clinical value in these cases.
Project description:Malignant brain tumors such as glioblastoma (GBM) and brain metastasis have poor prognosis despite conventional therapies. Successful use of vaccines and checkpoint inhibitors in systemic malignancy has increased the hope that immune therapies could improve survival in patients with brain tumors. Manipulating the immune system to fight malignancy has a long history of both modest breakthroughs and pitfalls that should be considered when applying the current immunotherapy approaches to patients with brain tumors. Therapeutic vaccine trials for GBM date back to the mid 1900s and have taken many forms; from irradiated tumor lysate to cell transfer therapies and peptide vaccines. These therapies were generally well tolerated without significant autoimmune toxicity, however also did not demonstrate significant clinical benefit. In contrast, the newer checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated durable benefit in some metastatic malignancies, accompanied by significant autoimmune toxicity. While this toxicity was not unexpected, it exceeded what was predicted from pre-clinical studies and in many ways was similar to the prior trials of immunostimulants. This review will discuss the history of these studies and demonstrate that the future use of immune therapy for brain tumors will likely need a personalized approach that balances autoimmune toxicity with the opportunity for significant survival benefit.
Project description:Glioma and brain metastasis can be difficult to distinguish on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to the similarity of imaging features in specific clinical circumstances. Multiple studies have investigated the use of machine learning (ML) models for non-invasive differentiation of glioma from brain metastasis. Many of the studies report promising classification results, however, to date, none have been implemented into clinical practice. After a screening of 12,470 studies, we included 29 eligible studies in our systematic review. From each study, we aggregated data on model design, development, and best classifiers, as well as quality of reporting according to the TRIPOD statement. In a subset of eligible studies, we conducted a meta-analysis of the reported AUC. It was found that data predominantly originated from single-center institutions (n = 25/29) and only two studies performed external validation. The median TRIPOD adherence was 0.48, indicating insufficient quality of reporting among surveyed studies. Our findings illustrate that despite promising classification results, reliable model assessment is limited by poor reporting of study design and lack of algorithm validation and generalizability. Therefore, adherence to quality guidelines and validation on outside datasets is critical for the clinical translation of ML for the differentiation of glioma and brain metastasis.
Project description:(1) Introduction and objective: Surgical resection plays an important role in the multidisciplinary treatment of lung cancer patients with brain metastases (BMs). Precisely distinguishing the tumor border intraoperatively to improve and maximize the extent of resection (EOR) without causing permanent neurological defects is crucial but still challenging. Therefore, we introduced our experience of utilizing sodium fluorescein (SF) in microneurosurgery of BMs from lung cancer. This study aims to evaluate whether the use of SF-guided surgery has a positive impact on postoperative outcomes. (2) Materials and methods: A retrospective study was performed to collect data on a consecutive case series of patients with BMs from lung cancer who underwent surgical resection from January 2020 to December 2021 at the Department of Neuro-Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital. A total of 52 patients were enrolled, of which 23 received SF-guided surgery and 29 did not. EOR was assessed pre- and postoperatively on T1 contrast-enhanced MRI. Clinical and epidemiological data as well as follow-up were gathered and analyzed. (3) Results: Compared with the non-SF-guided group, the SF-guided group revealed a significantly better EOR (87.0% vs. 62.1%) and a lower incidence of local recurrence (8.7% vs. 34.5%). Survival benefits were seen in patients with NSCLC, patients who were undergoing SF-guided surgery, and patients receiving postoperative systemic therapy. (4) Conclusions: SF-guiding under the YELLOW 560 nm filter is a safe and feasible tool for improving the EOR in patients with BMs from lung cancer, leading to better local recurrence control and prolonged survival.
Project description:BackgroundIntraoperative brain stimulation mapping reduces permanent postoperative deficits and extends tumor removal in resective surgery for glioma patients. Successful functional mapping is assumed to depend on the surgical team's expertise. In this study, glioma resection results are quantified and compared using a novel approach, so-called resection probability maps (RPM), exemplified by a surgical team comparison, here with long and short experience in mapping.MethodsAdult patients with glioma were included by two centers with two and fifteen years of mapping experience. Resective surgery was targeted at non-enhanced MRI extension and was limited by functional boundaries. Neurological outcome was compared. To compare resection results, we applied RPMs to quantify and compare the resection probability throughout the brain at 1 mm resolution. Considerations for spatial dependence and multiple comparisons were taken into account.ResultsThe senior surgical team contributed 56, and the junior team 52 patients. The patient cohorts were comparable in age, preoperative tumor volume, lateralization, and lobe localization. Neurological outcome was similar between teams. The resection probability on the RPMs was very similar, with none (0%) of 703,967 voxels in left-sided tumors being differentially resected, and 124 (0.02%) of 644,153 voxels in right-sided tumors.ConclusionRPMs provide a quantitative volumetric method to compare resection results, which we present as standard for quality assessment of resective glioma surgery because brain location bias is avoided. Stimulation mapping is a robust surgical technique, because the neurological outcome and functional-based resection results using stimulation mapping are independent of surgical experience, supporting wider implementation.
Project description:Diagnosis and monitoring of primary brain tumours, brain metastasis and acute ischaemic stroke all require invasive, burdensome and costly diagnostics, frequently lacking adequate sensitivity, particularly during disease monitoring. Monocytes are known to migrate to damaged tissues, where they act as tissue macrophages, continuously scavenging, phagocytizing and digesting apoptotic cells and other tissue debris. We hypothesize that upon completion of their tissue-cleaning task, these tissue macrophages might migrate via the lymph system to the bloodstream, where they can be detected and evaluated for their phagolysosomal contents. We discovered a blood monocyte subpopulation carrying the brain-specific glial fibrillary acidic protein in glioma patients and in patients with brain metastasis and evaluated the diagnostic potential of this finding. Blood samples were collected in a cross-sectional study before or during surgery from adult patients with brain lesions suspected of glioma. Together with blood samples from healthy controls, these samples were flowing cytometrically evaluated for intracellular glial fibrillary acidic protein in monocyte subsets. Acute ischaemic stroke patients were tested at multiple time points after onset to evaluate the presence of glial fibrillary acidic protein-carrying monocytes in other forms of brain tissue damage. Clinical data were collected retrospectively. High-grade gliomas (N = 145), brain metastasis (N = 21) and large stroke patients (>100 cm3) (N = 3 versus 6; multiple time points) had significantly increased frequencies of glial fibrillary acidic protein+CD16+ monocytes compared to healthy controls. Based on both a training and validation set, a cut-off value of 0.6% glial fibrillary acidic protein+CD16+ monocytes was established, with 81% sensitivity (95% CI 75-87%) and 85% specificity (95% CI 80-90%) for brain lesion detection. Acute ischaemic strokes of >100 cm3 reached >0.6% of glial fibrillary acidic protein+CD16+ monocytes within the first 2-8 h after hospitalization and subsided within 48 h. Glioblastoma patients with >20% glial fibrillary acidic protein+CD16+ non-classical monocytes had a significantly shorter median overall survival (8.1 versus 12.1 months). Our results and the available literature, support the hypothesis of a tissue-origin of these glial fibrillary acidic protein-carrying monocytes. Blood monocytes carrying glial fibrillary acidic protein have a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of brain lesions and for glioblastoma patients with a decreased overall survival. Furthermore, their very rapid response to acute tissue damage identifies large areas of ischaemic tissue damage within 8 h after an ischaemic event. These studies are the first to report the clinical applicability for brain tissue damage detection through a minimally invasive diagnostic method, based on blood monocytes and not serum markers, with direct consequences for disease monitoring in future (therapeutic) studies and clinical decision making in glioma and acute ischaemic stroke patients.
Project description:BackgroundBrain metastasis quantity may be a negative prognostic factor for patients requiring resection of at least one lesion.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent surgical resection of brain metastases from July 2018 to June 2019 at our institution, and examined outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and rates of local failure (LF). Patients were grouped according to the number of metastases at the time of surgery (single vs multiple).ResultsWe identified 130 patients who underwent surgical resection as the initial treatment modality. At the time of surgery, 87 patients had only one lesion (control) and 43 had multiple (>1). Two-year OS for the entire cohort was 46%, with equal rates in both the multiple metastases group and the control group (P = .335). 2-year PFS was 27%; 21% in the multiple metastases group and 31% in the control group (P = .766). The rate of LF at 2 years was 32%, with equal rates in both the multiple lesion group and control group (P = .889). On univariate analysis, multiplicity was not significantly correlated to OS (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.51-1.26, P = .336), PFS (HR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.71-1.59, P = .766) or LF (HR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.57-1.97, P = .840). Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative tumor volume of the resected lesion to be the single correlate for OS (P = .0032) and PFS (P = .0081).ConclusionsHaving more than one metastasis does not negatively impact outcomes in patients treated with surgery. In carefully selected patients, especially those with large tumors, surgery should be considered regardless of the total number of lesions.